SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

F-4 Phantom
Varsity
Posts: 604
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:39 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by F-4 Phantom »

Minford


User avatar
sportsmr
Freshman Team
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:53 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by sportsmr »

Great post pmow. If anybody wants to talk about holding waverlys offensive tackle (no names/numbers) held all night long. That may have been best officiating crew we saw all night. Hahahaha


hbk2016
Varsity
Posts: 519
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:19 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by hbk2016 »

Valley was clearly the better team, I just disagree with the cheap shot on Roback.


smurray
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 10072
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:52 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by smurray »

I did not say Waverly was the better team or that they deserved to win. Obviously they weren't, they got beat 23-6.
Waverly had opportunity after opportunity but shot themselves in the foot. The weather and sloppy field neutralized many of aspects of the game, leveling the field for the Tigers that night. They did not take advantage of those opportunities.

Make all the smartelic comments the you want, I stand by what I said.


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5540
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by coop »

tigers2010onhuddle wrote:I did not say Waverly was the better team or that they deserved to win. Obviously they weren't, they got beat 23-6.
Waverly had opportunity after opportunity but shot themselves in the foot. The weather and sloppy field neutralized many of aspects of the game, leveling the field for the Tigers that night. They did not take advantage of those opportunities.

Make all the smartelic comments the you want, I stand by what I said.



I agree with your assesment......mud can level the playing field for anyone..


bull rusher
Waterboy
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:26 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by bull rusher »

I mean I remember Coleman being on his back alot of the time guess the 6'5 DE couldn't do much against the 6'1 280 tackle...?


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5540
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: SOC2 Valley (5-1) @ Waverly (3-3)

Post by coop »

bull rusher wrote:I mean I remember Coleman being on his back alot of the time guess the 6'5 DE couldn't do much against the 6'1 280 tackle...?


or.....he was getting tackled. :evil:


Post Reply

Return to “Football”