LoganLocos wrote:Wrestler87 wrote:Although Logan has been dominant, it hasn't had as many NEW, untested, YOUNG starters as it has had since the 90's next year. (Unless I've missed 1 yr! Hehe) This is the year to beat the Chiefs, if it's to be done! I see at least 3 losses, but what the other teams bring can affect that by 1 either way IMO. If someone wants an SEOAL Title, you'd better load up in the next couple of years. The Chiefs will be back!
Again, congrat's on a good 2009 Season. Should have been longer! Losing a fella who accounted for a piece of 80% of the offense takes all team's playoff hopes away. GRRR
Good luck to all, and to all a good night!
wrestler -
Logan returned only 5 starters in 2001 and went 10-0.
They returned 4 starters in 2002 and went 6-4.
And they returned 5 starters again in 2005 and finished 8-2.
Logan will return only 3-4 starters in 2010. It will be a tall task, but history shows that LHS has rebounded before from huge losses.
It will take a group of kids stepping up and stepping into new roles.
In especially the 2001 team, the 2nd team was almost as good as the 1st team when they went in (In the 2000 season). Can we say that about our Soph's who played this year? Not many. The returning players in 2005 were the Stellar sophs graduating on the stellar 2007 team. The 7th-8th grade teams of those earlier years looked better (to me, as a whole)than -"next year's 11th grade team". This is a new set of circumstances.
In addition, I think we agreed when we posted our overall record predictions for next year. Give or take 1.
I do agree with you, but this isn't going to be exactly the same as it has been.
GO CHIEFS!!!