(Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:41 pm
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:58 am
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Watched Gallia and Warren. Gallia just took opportunities presented and Warren did not. Both teams should be livid at how poor the officials were. (Same crew that did Warren v Chesapeake, they were just as horrednous as this week) Many just bad or questionable calls going both ways. Looked like they were making it up as they went along. Warren won the game on paper, but lost at the most important part, the score-board. Logan should come away with a minimum 14-17 point win.
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21215
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Sounds like raw sewage was surfacing somewhere, maybe a leech bed septic system back up. How close is the field to the river? No, the gas from raw sewage and breathing it is not good at constant high levels for anyone. Not fit for man or animals. If a constant strong sewer odor is present, there's a problem that needs to be checked out and fixed.Blackjack wrote:KVN - was at the Portsmouth game and noticed the field had a strong odor of a sewer. Is that safe for the kids?
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
I remember that smell when we played down there trench.Must not be that bad or we be dead by now, although a few members of our team have passed on so maybe they were exposed to sewage ,heck Logan High School is even having their own problem with sewage right now over in that ditch, but at least they got the carpet to play on and don't have to worry about it coming up through the ground
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21215
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Maybe that's what's wrong with me Bolt, replacing all those sewer lines and pipe up in Reynoldsburg all those years. I'm sick all the time, it seems like. Breathing to much sewer gas over time probably.
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Trenchfoot wrote:Maybe that's what's wrong with me Bolt, replacing all those sewer lines and pipe up in Reynoldsburg all those years. I'm sick all the time, it seems like. Breathing to much sewer gas over time probably.
Looks like out in front of Logan City council
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21215
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Bolt, you been wanting me to put this picture on here for awhile now, so I thought what a good time to do it talking about raw sewage. You know where it's at. Location of this picture is classified but shows how raw sewage gets in our lakes and rivers basically and needs to be stopped. It is a comical picture though. Noreply, you got that right about LCC.
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
If the injured Logan linemen are back, they win with ease.. If they aren't, they still win.. High scoring game..
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:52 pm
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
a lot depends on where your at with the sewer smell. there is a spot toward the visiting locker room. and one spot on the visiting side that the storm drains connect into the sewer system. really only notice the smell when it rains. also not to far behind the visitors side is chickamuga creek and some of those houses used to have septic tanks and leach beds that when it rain caused a worse odor.
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
That smell will never go away! Smelled back in the early 70's and that no S???!kvnchambers wrote:a lot depends on where your at with the sewer smell. there is a spot toward the visiting locker room. and one spot on the visiting side that the storm drains connect into the sewer system. really only notice the smell when it rains. also not to far behind the visitors side is chickamuga creek and some of those houses used to have septic tanks and leach beds that when it rain caused a worse odor.
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
I don't know how anyone from Gallipolis can complain about sewer smell when Chickamauga Creek floods Memorial field every year and it's known to be a sewer creek!kvnchambers wrote:a lot depends on where your at with the sewer smell. there is a spot toward the visiting locker room. and one spot on the visiting side that the storm drains connect into the sewer system. really only notice the smell when it rains. also not to far behind the visitors side is chickamuga creek and some of those houses used to have septic tanks and leach beds that when it rain caused a worse odor.
That's a sore subject with me, how they never planned on building a new football field and get our kids out of that disease infested place!! just a little saving on the huge cavernous school and we would have a new football field! Ridiculous!
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21215
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Any sewer smell will go away if the problem is found and fixed properly. It's usually a simple back up or a busted pipe or not being channeled correctly. Could be other issues causing it as well.moonshine wrote:That smell will never go away! Smelled back in the early 70's and that no S???!kvnchambers wrote:a lot depends on where your at with the sewer smell. there is a spot toward the visiting locker room. and one spot on the visiting side that the storm drains connect into the sewer system. really only notice the smell when it rains. also not to far behind the visitors side is chickamuga creek and some of those houses used to have septic tanks and leach beds that when it rain caused a worse odor.
- dazed&confused
- SEOPS HO
- Posts: 9287
- Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
- Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Hope you're right. I'm not as close to the underclasses anymore. I just dont hear any buzz coming from them. And Jackson cleaned Logan's clocks at all grade levels. That tells me something. It used to be the other way around.Ultron wrote:Dazed&Confused,
Could you explain why you think Logan will continue to be a 5- 5 program moving forward? You said based on the under classes, and I would like to disagree. Logan's freshman went 5-3 as Eighth graders... not quite sure their record this year.. The current 8th grade went 4-3-1, and the 7th grade went 5-3. How does that equate to 5-5 moving forward, with a much softer schedule the next couple of years. Next year will be year 3 of the Burke era, and I have a feeling that not only will next years squad be a possible playoff team( softer schedule), but that the following years we will continue to see logan improve.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4138
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
FWIW - my class couldn't string together multiple first downs in MS. Ended up 10-0 and hosting the first ever home playoff game our senior year.dazed&confused wrote: Hope you're right. I'm not as close to the underclasses anymore. I just dont hear any buzz coming from them. And Jackson cleaned Logan's clocks at all grade levels. That tells me something. It used to be the other way around.
I think Alex Penrod was like our 4th string QB at that level while Matt Mong and Derek Harden (who both played D1 college football) were guards (they played FB and TB in HS).
I don't know much about the younger grades to be honest. But have also learned to be careful about using it as a measuring stick.
Jackson looks to be loaded for a while though. Logan's current freshman class looks pretty good to me, injuries and a weird schedule have really hurt them. But I see some pretty good football players in that class.
- doubleplay643
- S
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
Don't disagree with your analysis Locos all that much.
On a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no correlation between peewee, middle school and varsity success and 100 being absolute certainty between peewee, middle school and varsity success. I give the correlation about a 67.32.
The younger classes gives you some ideas about athleticism and overall ability, but kids change a bunch between 11 and 16, not to mention people move in move out, etc.
Similar to comparing common opponents when predicting a game, yes there is some correlation but match-ups and rivals and weather and who is hurt not hurt plays into a lot as well.
On a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being no correlation between peewee, middle school and varsity success and 100 being absolute certainty between peewee, middle school and varsity success. I give the correlation about a 67.32.
The younger classes gives you some ideas about athleticism and overall ability, but kids change a bunch between 11 and 16, not to mention people move in move out, etc.
Similar to comparing common opponents when predicting a game, yes there is some correlation but match-ups and rivals and weather and who is hurt not hurt plays into a lot as well.
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
It would be interesting to see the success rates of how Logan's playoff teams fared in the lower grades,I know Locos says his class struggled, but I bet most those teams had one or two grades that were pretty good all the way through.I would say 67 TO 70 percent would be pretty accurate doubleplay.
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
A lot of time in boys they will get their full height in the 7th or 8th grade [even 6th] and they will be MS stars but after that the other will catch up or even pass them.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:38 pm
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
I think you're right C Bolt, but let us hope for better! If the kids work hard, and the numbers stay up, Logan's got a fighting chance for keeping the program more than respectable any given year. For now, Go Chiefs!
Re: (Week 9) Gallipolis (4-4) at Logan (3-5)
My Logan High class never won a single 7th thru 9th grade game in both football & basketball. (several years ago) In fact, we never came close to winning. The class below us were also bad. My senior year we were 7-3 in football and won 80% of our basketball games.. We got stronger, faster and were better coached in high school. Plus, I think a lot of it has to do with numbers. With a lot of kids on the team, you work harder to be the best at your position or someone else will take your place...