Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post Reply
EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Fort Frye doesn't even play River. Also like I said Fort has one of the stronger strength of schedules they are currently projected to make the playoffs at (6-4). Fort can only do so much with the schedule only D7 team on the schedule are PVC teams and Waterford.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Chaw wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:36 pm The divisions are based on number of male students enrolled not how many players they have.

DIV. VII DIV. VI
0-99 100-150


Belpre. 102 ( barely div. VI)

Waterford. 73. (Below average of div VII)

Shenandoah. 103 ( barely VI)

River. 108 (another barely)

Warren. (Div.III .....but c'mon.. it's Warren)

Fort Frye. 143 (7 from div. V)

Northridge. Div. VI. Fort lost

Shenandoah will probably trounce the fort by 2 tds

The rest are Div. VII

Belpre and Shenandoah both were div. VII last year. So a practically div. V team beats mostly div. VII teams every year. PLAY SOMEBODY...
Also you didn't even get the schedule right they also play D6 Stubemville Catholic and D6 Barnesville. Think it's funny you think they lost to Northridge because they're bigger. You know Fort won the first 2 meetings right? The reason Fort Frye beats Waterford has nothing to do with school size.Its because they are better coached.. Stop complaining about school size and get better. Why does school size even matter when you have 38 players and Fort has 34? It's a cop out man.


Jughead
Waterboy
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:22 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Jughead »

Again it's the number of male students. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it not true


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Jughead wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:57 pm Again it's the number of male students. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it not true
But what does it really mean for this game?


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Jughead wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:57 pm Again it's the number of male students. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it not true
Do you think that the fact that Fort Frye has a 140 boys 34 which play football had anything to do with the game? No it didn't it's just a lame excuse for some sore losers. Waterford thought this was the year they'd win and they didn't now you guys are just crying. We're talking D6 vs D7 it's not like we're talking a school with 250 plus. Fort has 34 players and you guys are crying over Schools size. Total Lames


Orange and Brown
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 20590
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Next to a lake somewhere
Contact:

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Orange and Brown »

Jughead wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:57 pm Again it's the number of male students. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it not true
Everyone Nelsonville-York plays accept for Trimble and Newark Catholic (same size) is bigger.
We are the smallest school in the TVC-OHIO and we don't complain.
Get better!


Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: WK3 (1-1) Fort Frye @ Waterford (2-0)

Post by EasternDspy »

TheDoctor wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:02 pm If Waterford puts up 30+ Friday night I'll meet you down at Jukebox after the game and buy you and your family dinner
Jukebox for life.


TheDoctor
Riding the Bench
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:33 am

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by TheDoctor »

I think Billy Bob owes me a pizza


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

TheDoctor wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 8:59 am I think Billy Bob owes me a pizza
I say he buys you that or a Farmer from Turners after a long Friday drinking binge.


TheDoctor
Riding the Bench
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:33 am

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by TheDoctor »

I'm good with either one... Billy Bob direct message my self and Eastern, we want our food


Billybob55
JV Team
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Billybob55 »

TheDoctor wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:28 am I'm good with either one... Billy Bob direct message my self and Eastern, we want our food
It wasn't me who said 30+. I said Waterford 22 FF 19. I'll take a large BBQ chicken pizza from the guy who said 30+


TheDoctor
Riding the Bench
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:33 am

Re: WK3 (1-1) Fort Frye @ Waterford (2-0)

Post by TheDoctor »

bbtrucking.inc wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:50 pm
TheDoctor wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:12 am As much as I want to take Waterford in this one, I don't think the big green have enough depth to outlast the the Cadets. FF by two scores...

The DB campaign will still be in full force...Baldwin for Mayor #pizzaparty
The cadet defense does not have the defense to interupt anything less than 30 or so points. SO the offense is going to have to step it up and do way better than against Northridge.
My bad Billybob....BB trucking is on the hook for pizza


Billybob55
JV Team
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: WK3 (1-1) Fort Frye @ Waterford (2-0)

Post by Billybob55 »

bbtrucking.inc wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:50 pm
TheDoctor wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:12 am As much as I want to take Waterford in this one, I don't think the big green have enough depth to outlast the the Cadets. FF by two scores...

The DB campaign will still be in full force...Baldwin for Mayor #pizzaparty
The cadet defense does not have the defense to interupt anything less than 30 or so points. SO the offense is going to have to step it up and do way better than against Northridge.
Pizza party on you bbtrucking


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: WK3 (1-1) Fort Frye @ Waterford (2-0)

Post by EasternDspy »

Billybob55 wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2017 10:55 am
bbtrucking.inc wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:50 pm
TheDoctor wrote: Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:12 am As much as I want to take Waterford in this one, I don't think the big green have enough depth to outlast the the Cadets. FF by two scores...

The DB campaign will still be in full force...Baldwin for Mayor #pizzaparty
The cadet defense does not have the defense to interupt anything less than 30 or so points. SO the offense is going to have to step it up and do way better than against Northridge.
Pizza party on you bbtrucking
Heck Yea!!!


J8fusl
Freshman Team
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:29 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by J8fusl »

I feel like if you're going to use school size as an excuse then FF shouldn't be considered your rival.

When you lose to a rival you're supposed to complain about officials, coaching, 'cheating', and 'dirty players'. Lol. When it gets to school size you need to find a new rival I guess.

I hate posting this after the pizza party plans were made, but I wanted to get my two cents in there. Lol


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

J8fusl wrote: Fri Sep 15, 2017 1:23 pm I feel like if you're going to use school size as an excuse then FF shouldn't be considered your rival.

When you lose to a rival you're supposed to complain about officials, coaching, 'cheating', and 'dirty players'. Lol. When it gets to school size you need to find a new rival I guess.

I hate posting this after the pizza party plans were made, but I wanted to get my two cents in there. Lol
Pretty lame excuse when your team has more players if you asked me.


Jughead
Waterboy
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:22 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Jughead »

Of course you would coming from the bigger school and you are correct this year it didn't matter but in the history of the rivalry it has made a huge difference as you said that bringing in warren in the pvc would be much bigger than the rest of the school. So lame I don't think so


efarns
S
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:29 am

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by efarns »

Your AD continues to schedule the game.


Jughead
Waterboy
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 8:22 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by Jughead »

You are right about that people in Waterford want to believe we can compete with ff in football but I believe the series is 35 -7 all time just like leaving the pvc was a tough decision I believe it would be in the best interest of Waterford to drop ff and pick up another d7 school


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Fort Frye(23) @ (19)Waterford

Post by EasternDspy »

Jughead wrote: Fri Sep 15, 2017 4:40 pm You are right about that people in Waterford want to believe we can compete with ff in football but I believe the series is 35 -7 all time just like leaving the pvc was a tough decision I believe it would be in the best interest of Waterford to drop ff and pick up another d7 school
Really best interest? That game prob brings in double what your other home games bring. Also you beat Fort in basketball last year what's the difference there? School size is lamest excuse I've ever heard in this rivalry. You haven't beat us in Football because we're better. The enrollments before this one was like 98-128 in terms of boys. Trust me both schools are still small we're talking 1 div. You want to bring up Warren who had close 325 kids and say that's like what's it's like with Fort over Waterford. Fort and Waterford are very similar you add both the schools up they still have less then Warren. I don't hear you complaining about Belpre and Federal Hocking they are both D6 also. Should Waterford go dropping them? Should Waterford go Beallsville and go join a small WV league?


Post Reply

Return to “Football”