Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post Reply
vladimir
S
Posts: 1661
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by vladimir »

NewEra wrote:
Bo_Diaz wrote:Piguet is also a player that saw plenty of minutes for the Falcons that isn't playing this year.
Why didn't Piquet play!?


mglight88
SE
Posts: 2001
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:15 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by mglight88 »

You can play both soccer and football during the fall, sounds like just a choice he made. A good student-athlete all around.


vladimir
S
Posts: 1661
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by vladimir »

^ Yes, I agree. However, I don't know if he was given the choice of playing both, and was forced to make a choice. If he was not, then just imagine that 2000 team without Parks.


Dr_Know
Riding the Bench
Posts: 79
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:19 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by Dr_Know »

patro3410 wrote:I'm new to this area and Minford, and if Vladimir is a past , present or future coach then I should have chosen a different area to send my kids. Cause with his attitude and degrading of kids that's not someone I would want around the peewee program. I know this is a football forum but wow. Or maybe he is one of those people who thought he could play football and now he knows how to coach :lol: Valley is a good team but I'm going with Minford .
You must be really new to the are if you say "Valley is a good team but I'm going with Minford"

Having watched my Pirates play both teams, I can assure you that Valley is better than good. The Falcons will need Valley to make game changing mistakes to stay around in this one. These teams seem to be headed in opposite directions but I'd like to see the Falcons pull the upset. My guess is the Indians get up early and grind away a win as they get ready for the playoffs. Good luck both teams!


User avatar
js7_22
Varsity
Posts: 529
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:41 am
Location: Southern Ohio

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by js7_22 »

Valley has proven all year long that it is the best team in the area, and one of the best in their Division. Minford has its great moments but then also has its blunders. The fire power of Valley will not change week 10 and Minford unfortunately finds itself with their 3rd loss of the year and missing out of the playoffs.

Valley - 42
Minford - 14 (1 score with Varsity, 1 with JV late)


B0UNCE
Riding the Bench
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by B0UNCE »

patro3410 wrote:I'm new to this area and Minford, and if Vladimir is a past , present or future coach then I should have chosen a different area to send my kids. Cause with his attitude and degrading of kids that's not someone I would want around the peewee program. I know this is a football forum but wow. Or maybe he is one of those people who thought he could play football and now he knows how to coach :lol: Valley is a good team but I'm going with Minford .
@ Vladimir, I don't believe you have degraded any kids and have made some interesting points. But being a past coach or present could be the support of the Wing T of the Falcons long time offense. The problem (opinion only) is based around everybody we play in the conference knows and seen it year after year.


User avatar
YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 25617
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: WAVERLY, OHIO

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT »

if valley does not have a letdown game after the huge win over burg, and don't overlook Minford, they roll into week 11 unblemished again.man these guys got it rolling


vladimir
S
Posts: 1661
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by vladimir »

@Bounce, Thank you for being able to comprehend what I've had to say. You're correct, I've never degraded or singled out any kid nor coach. As far as coaching, I'm a past coach within the Wing-T system. As from what we had in the late 90's and before this coaching staff, we are way ahead. My biggest concern is with the scheduling and continuing to challenge ourselves, but I'll wait until after this week to really get into all that. For now: GO RED!!


B0UNCE
Riding the Bench
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by B0UNCE »

Well lets hope the Falcons get everything together and play to what the expectations of this years team should be.


Pistol Pete
Waterboy
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:36 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by Pistol Pete »

Yes, I am a new member of this forum and area. Everybody has opinion which is fine and to answer your question My kids are peewee football players.

As a new person to the area looking at new era would be running the spread offense a little more and read option. Going out of the spread does not mean you have to launch the ball every time , mix it up a little bit, ground and pound does not always work. As big and tough as Minford O-line is do something a little different. When you have the opposing teams defense lining up in the box 90% of the time the offensive coordinator should be smart enough to go to the spread. I mean 2 run plays in a row and your backs get tackled for negative yardage and then you pass on 3rd down, umm what coach doesn't know that play is coming and if a good coach has watched enough film they know what route the receiver is running and its a picked off pass.. just hoping for a little change in the "new era".

And Valley may have a good team, but I was at the Burg and Valley game and if Burg wouldn't have shot their selves in the foot a couple of times they would have won. To my understanding Valley has not lost a game in awhile which means they are going to come in over confident making to many mistakes.


vladimir
S
Posts: 1661
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by vladimir »

^Well, Dontcha think you need the personnel in the first place to run the spread and Spread/Gun Zone option? This is small school football so you have to run your offense according to the kids you have. I'm not "Degrading," any of our kids, but we don't have the speed to do that. With the personnel and O-line we have the Wing-T, Straight T, Wishbone, I formations best suits this bunch. Again, not "Degrading" just telling it like it is.

If you're thinking well the area knows we run the Wing-T, and they put 9 in the box. Tell that to Clinton-Massie who won the D4 state championship last year and ran the WingT and only passed the ball 6 times the whole game, against 9 in the box. Tell that to Kettering Alter who runs the double tight wishbone against 9 in the box, and has won multiple state titles doing just that. Both have not changed their offense in decades. These teams have a system in place, they stick with it, and run it to perfection. Both Clinton Massie and Kettering Alter are the very top ranked teams in Region 14 (Same region as Minford,) and guess what? They run the ball over 95% of the time.


B0UNCE
Riding the Bench
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by B0UNCE »

patro3410 wrote:Yes, I am a new member of this forum and area. Everybody has opinion which is fine and to answer your question My kids are peewee football players.

As a new person to the area looking at new era would be running the spread offense a little more and read option. Going out of the spread does not mean you have to launch the ball every time , mix it up a little bit, ground and pound does not always work. As big and tough as Minford O-line is do something a little different. When you have the opposing teams defense lining up in the box 90% of the time the offensive coordinator should be smart enough to go to the spread. I mean 2 run plays in a row and your backs get tackled for negative yardage and then you pass on 3rd down, umm what coach doesn't know that play is coming and if a good coach has watched enough film they know what route the receiver is running and its a picked off pass.. just hoping for a little change in the "new era".

And Valley may have a good team, but I was at the Burg and Valley game and if Burg wouldn't have shot their selves in the foot a couple of times they would have won. To my understanding Valley has not lost a game in awhile which means they are going to come in over confident making to many mistakes.
Exactly, our line has been beat all year in SOC play. But when your facing 10 in the box it is difficult to block them all which then blows up our play before it gets started.


B0UNCE
Riding the Bench
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by B0UNCE »

Vladimir wrote:^Well, Dontcha think you need the personnel in the first place to run the spread and Spread/Gun Zone option? This is small school football so you have to run your offense according to the kids you have. I'm not "Degrading," any of our kids, but we don't have the speed to do that. With the personnel and O-line we have the Wing-T, Straight T, Wishbone, I formations best suits this bunch. Again, not "Degrading" just telling it like it is.

If you're thinking well the area knows we run the Wing-T, and they put 9 in the box. Tell that to Clinton-Massie who won the D4 state championship last year and ran the WingT and only passed the ball 6 times the whole game, against 9 in the box. Tell that to Kettering Alter who runs the double tight wishbone against 9 in the box, and has won multiple state titles doing just that. Both have not changed their offense in decades. These teams have a system in place, they stick with it, and run it to perfection. Both Clinton Massie and Kettering Alter are the very top ranked teams in Region 14 (Same region as Minford,) and guess what? They run the ball over 95% of the time.
Why doesn't Minford have the personnel ? Where are we failing to progress? Vladimir are you even considering comparing the O line to Clinton Massie or Kettering.


Bo_Diaz
JV Team
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:10 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by Bo_Diaz »

patro3410 wrote:
And Valley may have a good team, but I was at the Burg and Valley game and if Burg wouldn't have shot their selves in the foot a couple of times they would have won. To my understanding Valley has not lost a game in awhile which means they are going to come in over confident making to many mistakes.
If a frog had wings it wouldn't bump its arse either. ;-)

Good teams don't make mistakes that get them beat.


vladimir
S
Posts: 1661
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by vladimir »

Guys if you going to run the spread then you have to go 100% all in, and run it to perfection. I do agree just jumping into the spread on 3rd down or in certain points in the game it allows the defense to know exactly what you are up to. It does give a chance to create a turnover, but most likely a 3 and out.

@Bounce: Well neither one of them have a D-1 kid on their O-line and we have possibly 2. If you've really watched those teams their O-line is not bigger than ours nor more athletic. Once you get to the state championships the talent evens out, so it's not like they have something all that different .... Point is, they have a system in place, they stick with it 100%, and they run it to perfection.


Izladoom
All State
Posts: 1109
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:38 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by Izladoom »

I know several parents at minford is tired of the wing t one is a good friend of mine has a son on the 8th grade team and he is transferring his kid from minford to valley this summer because he does not want his son in that offense


Jesco White
S
Posts: 1994
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by Jesco White »

patro3410 wrote:Yes, I am a new member of this forum and area. Everybody has opinion which is fine and to answer your question My kids are peewee football players.

As a new person to the area looking at new era would be running the spread offense a little more and read option. Going out of the spread does not mean you have to launch the ball every time , mix it up a little bit, ground and pound does not always work. As big and tough as Minford O-line is do something a little different. When you have the opposing teams defense lining up in the box 90% of the time the offensive coordinator should be smart enough to go to the spread. I mean 2 run plays in a row and your backs get tackled for negative yardage and then you pass on 3rd down, umm what coach doesn't know that play is coming and if a good coach has watched enough film they know what route the receiver is running and its a picked off pass.. just hoping for a little change in the "new era".

And Valley may have a good team, but I was at the Burg and Valley game and if Burg wouldn't have shot their selves in the foot a couple of times they would have won. To my understanding Valley has not lost a game in awhile which means they are going to come in over confident making to many mistakes.
You were doing so well, right up until the point of trying to reference the actual Valley-Minford game. Obviously you aren't "new to this forum", given that you have been a registered member for almost 9 years (you joined in January of 2005....did you forget it's there for all to see?) I doubt many Valley OR Minford teams have EVER come into a game against the other over confident, because it's a huge rivalry game. But, in your defense, you're "new to the area", right? ;)


Jesco White
S
Posts: 1994
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:32 am

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by Jesco White »

By the way patro,

I absolutely agree with your points regarding offensive philosophy! I think you're on the money with the type of things that would work. Hopefully coach Daniels and company will get it straightened out. Those guys have a lot of knowledge and I'm sure they'll get things squared away in the future.


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5540
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by coop »

I'm new to the area as well.


big_fella
Freshman Team
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 4:39 pm

Re: Valley (9-0) @ Minford (7-2)

Post by big_fella »

izladoom wrote:I know several parents at minford is tired of the wing t one is a good friend of mine has a son on the 8th grade team and he is transferring his kid from minford to valley this summer because he does not want his son in that offense
Well those parents also probably don't know anything about football. The wing-t turned this program around and when ran the correct way it's a very dangerous offense. Sometimes it just takes some patience and tiring out the defense to get what you want soo people seem to forget that. And on the spread comments we just don't have the speed nor he quarterback to this right now. And you saw what type of offense won head to head a power game referring to valley n burg. Which player are you referring to?


Post Reply

Return to “Football”