Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post Reply
ROCH HILL PRIDE!
Freshman Team
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:40 pm
Location: WIGWAM ON THE HILL

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by ROCH HILL PRIDE! »

I have never watched FF but sounds like they are quick, and have some athletes. If they can clean up the penalties, I think they can beat Bellaire.


REDMAN NATION RISE UP!!!
Mulga Roadrunner
Waterboy
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Mulga Roadrunner »

EasternDspy wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:58 pm Cadets move on 27-14. Got to play better Vs Bellaire.
FF can just show up and beat Bellaire again. Who will they play in the semifinal?


WJOSUSteelers
Waterboy
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by WJOSUSteelers »

Congrats to Fort Frye for the w and to Coal Grove for making it a game. This game may have been the best thing to happen to Fort Frye, the coaches should have no trouble getting the players attention this week in practice. Play like this in the semi-finals vs either Marion Local or Kirtland and it’s a running clock.


TigerBob
All Conference
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2021 10:35 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by TigerBob »

Mulga Roadrunner wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:56 pm
TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:51 pm
Mulga Roadrunner wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:45 pm

CG with 6 turnovers and only lost by 13 to the best team in the 740.
Believe they lost 55-6 to that team.
You must not have heard about the dominating Cadets.
I’m sorry but if you’re putting up 27 against Coal Grove, that speaks volumes.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by EasternDspy »

WJOSUSteelers wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:12 pm Congrats to Fort Frye for the w and to Coal Grove for making it a game. This game may have been the best thing to happen to Fort Frye, the coaches should have no trouble getting the players attention this week in practice. Play like this in the semi-finals vs either Marion Local or Kirtland and it’s a running clock.
I agree.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by EasternDspy »

TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:15 pm
Mulga Roadrunner wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:56 pm
TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:51 pm

Believe they lost 55-6 to that team.
You must not have heard about the dominating Cadets.
I’m sorry but if you’re putting up 27 against Coal Grove, that speaks volumes.
On an Ice Rink after losing one of your top lineman.


Mulga Roadrunner
Waterboy
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Mulga Roadrunner »

TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:15 pm
Mulga Roadrunner wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:56 pm
TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:51 pm

Believe they lost 55-6 to that team.
You must not have heard about the dominating Cadets.
I’m sorry but if you’re putting up 27 against Coal Grove, that speaks volumes.
Not according to FF fans. CG was worse than Shenandoah.


EasternDspy
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 18863
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by EasternDspy »

I was told that Hall had 97 rushing. He did have a nice game as a pass catcher.


VetteMan
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8145
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:58 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by VetteMan »

Congrats Cadets. Style points are nice, but at this stage of the season it's just win and advance. Good luck next week in the Regional Finals.


FBdog72
Waterboy
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:20 am

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by FBdog72 »

Great game. Hornets snot themselves in the foot the first five minutes. Coach should of called a timeout sooner and got them in line. As the penalty flags, they were flying both ways all night. CG got two TDS called back. The refs called a good game, just sucks when they’re on you. Good luck Cadets,


ROCH HILL PRIDE!
Freshman Team
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:40 pm
Location: WIGWAM ON THE HILL

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by ROCH HILL PRIDE! »

EasternDspy wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:20 pm I was told that Hall had 97 rushing. He did have a nice game as a pass catcher.
On the radio they said Hall went over 100, but they could have been wrong.


REDMAN NATION RISE UP!!!
ROCH HILL PRIDE!
Freshman Team
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:40 pm
Location: WIGWAM ON THE HILL

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by ROCH HILL PRIDE! »

TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:15 pm
Mulga Roadrunner wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:56 pm
TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:51 pm

Believe they lost 55-6 to that team.
You must not have heard about the dominating Cadets.
I’m sorry but if you’re putting up 27 against Coal Grove, that speaks volumes.

Very possible FF wouldn't have finished higher than 4th in the OVC this year.


REDMAN NATION RISE UP!!!
VetteMan
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8145
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:58 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by VetteMan »

Congrats Coal Grove on a very good season. You battled a very good team tonight in Fort Frye, and left it all on the field.


Ironmen98
All State
Posts: 1034
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:52 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Ironmen98 »

Much closer that I anticipated


Pinwheel
JV Team
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:02 am

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Pinwheel »

ROCH HILL PRIDE! wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:26 pm
TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:15 pm
Mulga Roadrunner wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:56 pm

You must not have heard about the dominating Cadets.
I’m sorry but if you’re putting up 27 against Coal Grove, that speaks volumes.

Very possible FF wouldn't have finished higher than 4th in the OVC this year.

How far down do you think they would have finished in that extremely tough conference?


Fanatic
Varsity
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 8:50 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Fanatic »

Are you talking about that extremely tough conference that has 1 team left in the playoffs.


ROCH HILL PRIDE!
Freshman Team
Posts: 152
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 4:40 pm
Location: WIGWAM ON THE HILL

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by ROCH HILL PRIDE! »

Pinwheel wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 2:20 pm
ROCH HILL PRIDE! wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:26 pm
TigerBob wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:15 pm

I’m sorry but if you’re putting up 27 against Coal Grove, that speaks volumes.

Very possible FF wouldn't have finished higher than 4th in the OVC this year.

How far down do you think they would have finished in that extremely tough conference?

Considering we scored more points on CG than FF did, I'd say no higher than 3rd, or 4th. CG finished 5th and gave them all they wanted.


REDMAN NATION RISE UP!!!
RollCoal
Varsity
Posts: 419
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by RollCoal »

It sounds like Coal Grove gave them a good game. Congratulations on a great season Grove!


The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and excepting a different result;
Albert Einstein
Pinwheel
JV Team
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:02 am

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Pinwheel »

Fanatic wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 2:33 pm Are you talking about that extremely tough conference that has 1 team left in the playoffs.


Yea that one ,that's the one ,the one with all of the talent from all the other schools around that area 😂


Pinwheel
JV Team
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2022 2:02 am

Re: Round 3- #5. Coal Grove (8-4) Vs # 1. Fort Frye (11-1)

Post by Pinwheel »

ROCH HILL PRIDE! wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 3:48 pm
Pinwheel wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 2:20 pm
ROCH HILL PRIDE! wrote: Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:26 pm


Very possible FF wouldn't have finished higher than 4th in the OVC this year.

How far down do you think they would have finished in that extremely tough conference?

Considering we scored more points on CG than FF did, I'd say no higher than 3rd, or 4th. CG finished 5th and gave them all they wanted.

I missed your score against coal grove? Enlighten me


Post Reply

Return to “Football”