WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Close game. Going with the Cadets.
Good luck and good health to both teams.
Good luck and good health to both teams.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Fort misses a FG after a Td was called back
14-0
6:17
2nd
14-0
6:17
2nd
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Marietta seems to have adjusted well. This is far from over.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
28-7
Grady Hesson with an awesome Td run
Cadets dominating.
Grady Hesson with an awesome Td run
Cadets dominating.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Marietta has guys out too. Why just point out one team? This games was competitive -- no "heads and shoulders above" going on here.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:54 pm Marietta is bigger
Fort Frye has the speed
Fort still has some guys out.
I have feeling this game comes down to last few mins.
Fort 20 Marietta 14
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Because if you've got guys out and lose the game, you can pull the "if we were at full strength..." card. It's a nice little loophole that is used quite a bit on this site (see Fort Frye/Caldwell thread). Just about as good as actually winning the game.Hookshot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 12, 2024 6:42 amMarietta has guys out too. Why just point out one team?EasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 12:54 pm Marietta is bigger
Fort Frye has the speed
Fort still has some guys out.
I have feeling this game comes down to last few mins.
Fort 20 Marietta 14
As for this game, Fort Frye was the better team and is still a better program. Marietta gaining the late momentum, only to blow it with a stupid penalty is par for the course.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:41 am
- Location: Hilliard
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
Marietta just cannot seem to get over the hump of 500 despite playing a schedule that is loaded with much smaller schools. It's frustrating and they should be a consistent 8-2 team every year. Maybe they win 1 of the remaining games but based on history, I doubt it. Seems like they are satisfied being a below average division 3 program and that's too bad.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:42 pm
Re: WK 8: Marietta (5-2) @ Fort Frye (5-2)
This is going to be one of those “was there and saw it with my own two eyes post” and also just an old man and has been thoughts. Marietta was lucky to lose this game by a touchdown. I hate to blame the refs and won’t because there was a fair mistake of legit penalties for the Cadets, but a few calls against them that lead to a TD were terrible calls, and now I will say that the lack of discipline with personal fouls for Marietta did help the cadets also.
The Cadets are a very very good team. They play about 14 kids in total and they make it a very long night for teams. You could definitely sense the Tigers frustration.
I was impressed with the Tigers. They are a much better team than in years past and I think they should be very proud. They are well coached just lack a little discipline. I think after Fort Frye got hammered by the Shamrocks fans thought they were down this year, but they are a very typical Fort Frye team, I would think maybe even a little better than in recent years. Just an old timers take on the best game around.
The Cadets are a very very good team. They play about 14 kids in total and they make it a very long night for teams. You could definitely sense the Tigers frustration.
I was impressed with the Tigers. They are a much better team than in years past and I think they should be very proud. They are well coached just lack a little discipline. I think after Fort Frye got hammered by the Shamrocks fans thought they were down this year, but they are a very typical Fort Frye team, I would think maybe even a little better than in recent years. Just an old timers take on the best game around.