Waverly vs. Westfall is here
For the MUSTANGS fans in need of directions to the game, here they are. Take Pherson Pike north to London Road and turn left. Stay on London Road to Rt. 316 and turn right. Follow 316 until you get to State Rt. 23, turn left or north and follow to Rt 752 and turn right. The school is on the right hand side. Word on the street is the MUSTANGS football players are just going to meet up at teays valley. waverly is good, THE MUSTANGS are better!!! MUSTANGS STILL BY 2 TD'S!!!
-
Riverrat Tiger
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 12:12 pm
So which is it 4p or 5p? That is a huge difference considering the seating and parking problem.
And where does it say we can't leave and re-enter? That would be just great not to be able to go back out and watch the Buckeyes. Of course I told my wife just last night they'd try to pull that one. As long as I have my ticket stub what's it matter?
Funny bugii
The road you'll turn right onto off of 23 is Rt.752. There is a sign that indicates the school is that direction.
And where does it say we can't leave and re-enter? That would be just great not to be able to go back out and watch the Buckeyes. Of course I told my wife just last night they'd try to pull that one. As long as I have my ticket stub what's it matter?
Funny bugii
The road you'll turn right onto off of 23 is Rt.752. There is a sign that indicates the school is that direction.
-
Sports 101
- Varsity
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:01 pm
bug ii wrote:For the MUSTANGS fans in need of directions to the game, here they are. Take Pherson Pike north to London Road and turn left. Stay on London Road to Rt. 316 and turn right. Follow 316 until you get to State Rt. 23, turn left or north and follow to Rt 752 and turn right. The school is on the right hand side. Word on the street is the MUSTANGS football players are just going to meet up at teays valley. waverly is good, THE MUSTANGS are better!!! MUSTANGS STILL BY 2 TD'S!!!
there might be a traffic Jam going that way, think I might go 22E to 104, to 316.
No wait, Oh I'll figure it out that day
tigers2010onhuddle the website says 4p, thats all I know.
The no exit/reentry is always that way for playoffs. once you go in , if you exit you must pay to reenter.
Gucci you asked why people think waverly cannot handle westfall, here is the logic I used. Besides the fact that I am a loyal fan of the mustangs,
I think there are 2 good comparisons for this game one would be Minford/piketon the other Zane trace.
witrh Miford and piketon these 2 teams battled it out til the end of the game, and anything could have happened to change the outcome of the game.
Waverly played Minford and won 33-2
Westfall played Piketon and won 42-7
Westfall and waverly played zane trace
Waverly won 49-8
westfall won 42-7
Now at this point it is safe to say that these two teams are pretty even. except come time to play Burg waverly lost. Now I am not taking anything from burg, But waverly had injuries, had they been healthy the outcome may have been different.
It is no secret no that Waverly still has injuries,
we assume that all will play and plan for it. BUT even if all are back they cannot be 100% from things posted about those injuries.
that is why I picked such a large gap in scores for this game. Waverly just hasn't had time to recover fully. Had waverly had time to recover and no new injuries occured last week I would have said westfall by 2tds like Bugii
I think there are 2 good comparisons for this game one would be Minford/piketon the other Zane trace.
witrh Miford and piketon these 2 teams battled it out til the end of the game, and anything could have happened to change the outcome of the game.
Waverly played Minford and won 33-2
Westfall played Piketon and won 42-7
Westfall and waverly played zane trace
Waverly won 49-8
westfall won 42-7
Now at this point it is safe to say that these two teams are pretty even. except come time to play Burg waverly lost. Now I am not taking anything from burg, But waverly had injuries, had they been healthy the outcome may have been different.
It is no secret no that Waverly still has injuries,
we assume that all will play and plan for it. BUT even if all are back they cannot be 100% from things posted about those injuries.
that is why I picked such a large gap in scores for this game. Waverly just hasn't had time to recover fully. Had waverly had time to recover and no new injuries occured last week I would have said westfall by 2tds like Bugii
-
LICKING COUNTY FAN
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 46635
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:05 am
- Location: Buckeye Lake, Ohio
- Contact:
-
Steely Dan
- SEOP
- Posts: 4406
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:58 pm
mstangmom, nowhere did I ever post why people think Waverly cannot handle Westfall. Go back and read my posts before you start making references about something I wrote.
You stated Waverly claims to have defense but the scores don't show it. I responded to you and others by saying you have to look beyond a score to analyze a game. You can't just look scores of games to make a comparison. I have never seen Westfall play and therefore will not make a prediction. If you are going to do that, than the only score you could look at would be the ZT scores because ZT is the only common opponent. But I won't even do that because the bottom line is it doesn't matter. I'm glad you think Westfall is 2 TD's better than a "healthy" Waverly. I hope your team feels the same way.
Go Tigers!!! Beat the MOOOSTANGS and their cowbells!
You stated Waverly claims to have defense but the scores don't show it. I responded to you and others by saying you have to look beyond a score to analyze a game. You can't just look scores of games to make a comparison. I have never seen Westfall play and therefore will not make a prediction. If you are going to do that, than the only score you could look at would be the ZT scores because ZT is the only common opponent. But I won't even do that because the bottom line is it doesn't matter. I'm glad you think Westfall is 2 TD's better than a "healthy" Waverly. I hope your team feels the same way.
Go Tigers!!! Beat the MOOOSTANGS and their cowbells!
SO SORRY I DID NOT USE THE WORD DEFENSE IN MY POST. fact is back when the SP game was close it was said that there were injuries, for PN it I don't remember I think it had something to do with Walls shoulder, For Burg it was injuries, For Ul there were more injuries. Now I don't know who plays where for waverly but when ever there are injuries there are scores against waverly's Defense. YOU asked I told you plain and simple.
-
Mad-Dogg
- SEOP
- Posts: 4161
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:34 pm
- Location: Wheelersburg Oh home of the 2x State Champs, 8x Regional Champs and 34x SOC Div 2 Champs
- Contact:
mstangmom wrote:Gucci you asked why people think waverly cannot handle westfall, here is the logic I used. Besides the fact that I am a loyal fan of the mustangs,
I think there are 2 good comparisons for this game one would be Minford/piketon the other Zane trace.
witrh Miford and piketon these 2 teams battled it out til the end of the game, and anything could have happened to change the outcome of the game.
Waverly played Minford and won 33-2
Westfall played Piketon and won 42-7
Westfall and waverly played zane trace
Waverly won 49-8
westfall won 42-7
Now at this point it is safe to say that these two teams are pretty even. except come time to play Burg waverly lost. Now I am not taking anything from burg, But waverly had injuries, had they been healthy the outcome may have been different.
It is no secret no that Waverly still has injuries,
we assume that all will play and plan for it. BUT even if all are back they cannot be 100% from things posted about those injuries.
that is why I picked such a large gap in scores for this game. Waverly just hasn't had time to recover fully. Had waverly had time to recover and no new injuries occured last week I would have said westfall by 2tds like Bugii
what happen in past games don't mean anything. take a look at these games.
burg 40 valley 0
wavery 37 valley 7
burg 21 minford 15
waverly 33 minford 2
burg 23 south point 0
waverly 38 south point 21
i also remember seein people say waverly by a many as 4+ touchdowns over burg and they won 31-7. so past scores are meaningless
If you'd been at these games you would know the reason for the scores. I'll try to walk you through them.
South Point. Scored one TD on an interception returned for a TD (not against the defense). SP never sustained a drive for a score. Their other two scores were based on TOs as well and did not go more than 35 yards.
PIck North was a battle and score a whopping 16 points on 3 field goals. Two of which were more than 40 yards.
Burg just flat out beat Waverly.
UL scores 0 points on Waverly in the second half when it mattered most.
Where exactly did I say Waverly's scores of games were due to injuries? Again, go back and read my posts. I won't use injuries as an excuse because that's part of football.
Any other questions?
South Point. Scored one TD on an interception returned for a TD (not against the defense). SP never sustained a drive for a score. Their other two scores were based on TOs as well and did not go more than 35 yards.
PIck North was a battle and score a whopping 16 points on 3 field goals. Two of which were more than 40 yards.
Burg just flat out beat Waverly.
UL scores 0 points on Waverly in the second half when it mattered most.
Where exactly did I say Waverly's scores of games were due to injuries? Again, go back and read my posts. I won't use injuries as an excuse because that's part of football.
Any other questions?
Nowhere did I say YOU SAID I said it was said there were injuries.
YOU were not used in any of the examples, only responding to to you when you asked why everyone is saying what they are about the DEFENSE at waverly.
Oh and if the points were scored on your offense then that just makes it better for us. our defense has scored a lot of points this season. and are looking to score more.
YOU were not used in any of the examples, only responding to to you when you asked why everyone is saying what they are about the DEFENSE at waverly.
Oh and if the points were scored on your offense then that just makes it better for us. our defense has scored a lot of points this season. and are looking to score more.
not complaining
we tigers are not complaining about the field or site. we are complaining that alot of fans are going to have to stand up bc of no seating. they are going to pay there money and maybe stand 4 rows deep behind other people, when if the game was at a bigger stadium ALL THE FANS could sit down and enjoy the game. thats my only complaint.
