
OHSAA RULES
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: OHSAA RULES
Not unless that same source would pay "regular" students tuition as well.
You can give an athlete "gifts" based on their athletic ability. You have to treat athletes the same way you treat non-athletes, and athletes can't accept anything not offered to non-athletes.
You can give an athlete "gifts" based on their athletic ability. You have to treat athletes the same way you treat non-athletes, and athletes can't accept anything not offered to non-athletes.
Re: OHSAA RULES
LoganLocos wrote:Not unless that same source would pay "regular" students tuition as well.
You can give an athlete "gifts" based on their athletic ability. You have to treat athletes the same way you treat non-athletes, and athletes can't accept anything not offered to non-athletes.
So, it would be legal as long as it was offered to all students?
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: OHSAA RULES
The way I understand the rule, yes.
For instance, if an athlete qualifies for vouchers under state or federal program, the state/federal government can pay for their education. But those programs are open to ALL students.
For instance, if an athlete qualifies for vouchers under state or federal program, the state/federal government can pay for their education. But those programs are open to ALL students.
Re: OHSAA RULES
I'm talking about an individual paying tuition for athletes with the sole purpose of making the football team better.
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:14 pm
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:46 pm
Re: OHSAA RULES
Couldn't you just as easily give the money to said student/athlete's parents and have them pay the tuition with it? There would be no questions ask, and the parents hand over the tuition.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4140
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: OHSAA RULES
oldcoachb wrote:I'm talking about an individual paying tuition for athletes with the sole purpose of making the football team better.
That would be a violation if I understand the rules correctly.
The hard part is proving it.