Oak Hill '09
Re: Oak Hill '09
I'll give you Westfall, but powerhouses do it year after year. How did Paint valley fair last year? Oak Hill will be 9-1 at worst and that is if Minford gets us. Anything worse than that and you will see a new staff at OHHS next year. Trust me on that one. Yes the SOC I is the worst league in the state. I would challege anyone to come up with another. That being said, we couldn't win it with the talent we had last year. The overall coaching for the Oaks must improve or will lose 3 games. There is no way the Oaks lose more than three and that is if the same bs from last year carries over, but I have a feeling thats not going to happen. Game plans and organization have to improve and if it does look for the Oaks to be right in the playoff hunt for the first time in the schools history. You think our Basketball crowds were big. Put a winning football team on the field like we did in the 80's and early 90's and our fans will pour in. Exciting times for Oak Hill Football.
Re: Oak Hill '09
Westfall (8-3, 7-0)
Piketon (6-4, 5-2)]
Paint Valley (8-2, 5-2)
Adena (6-4, 4-3)
Zane Trace (5-5, 4-3)
Southeastern (3-7, 2-5)
Huntington (1-9, 1-6)
Unioto (0-10, 0-7)
That's the entire svc see if you guy's play team's like Adena, Z.T, or maybe P.V it would get you guy's some playoff points, if you win. for sure. But Piketon and Westfall are out of your league
Piketon (6-4, 5-2)]
Paint Valley (8-2, 5-2)
Adena (6-4, 4-3)
Zane Trace (5-5, 4-3)
Southeastern (3-7, 2-5)
Huntington (1-9, 1-6)
Unioto (0-10, 0-7)
That's the entire svc see if you guy's play team's like Adena, Z.T, or maybe P.V it would get you guy's some playoff points, if you win. for sure. But Piketon and Westfall are out of your league
-
- All State
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
How will the changes to the Oak Hill coaching staff affect the outcome of next season?
Re: Oak Hill '09
What changes are you referring to? There is only one new coach on the staff. I am talking about the game planning and organization issues that were nery evident last season. I am hoping that they improve on their mistakes from last season and any good coach would want to do that. Right?
Re: Oak Hill '09
Yes, Oakie and I think they will. I would love to see the Oaks make the playoffs next season, but I'm not ready to say it's a lock yet.
Re: Oak Hill '09
Oaks will in my opinion go 7-3. They have the skill positions but don’t have the horses needed for the line. It the same thing that haunted them last year.
Just my opinion........
Just my opinion........
- crazee-oakaholic
- All Conference
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:56 am
- devilfan08
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:43 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
Oak Hill should win every SOCI game by at least 2 scores, no doubt about it. This is a team on the rise. The only teams they should possibly lose to would be Chesapeake and Minford. I don't know about making the playoffs. . . that schedule is awfully, awfully weak. Those D6 teams in the conference won't garner many points.
- get-r-done-oaks
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:13 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
Can someone explain why the Oaks are SOC 1 in football and SOC 2 in other sports. Thanks.
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2629
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:00 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
get-r-done-oaks wrote:Can someone explain why the Oaks are SOC 1 in football and SOC 2 in other sports. Thanks.
the reason for that is because of all the other schools that start SOC play after football season like Eastern,Western,Clay,South Webster, New Boston not having football. With adding those schools it bumps the Oaks to the SOC II
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:00 am
- BBallin fool
- SEOP
- Posts: 3749
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 12:06 pm
- Indian till death
- Waterboy
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:28 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
Foolsgold wrote:Oaks will in my opinion go 7-3. They have the skill positions but don’t have the horses needed for the line. It the same thing that haunted them last year.
Just my opinion........
I don't know WHAT you are talking about. At their game with Minford last year (2008) Oak Hill's line was barely smaller than the Falcons. I'd say equal. Their skilled positions were built well, too. No string-bean lightning bolts.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:50 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
Indian till death wrote:Foolsgold wrote:Oaks will in my opinion go 7-3. They have the skill positions but don’t have the horses needed for the line. It the same thing that haunted them last year.
Just my opinion........
I don't know WHAT you are talking about. At their game with Minford last year (2008) Oak Hill's line was barely smaller than the Falcons. I'd say equal. Their skilled positions were built well, too. No string-bean lightning bolts.
i agree indian we had the horse's n plenty of them, our problem was not O line coaching
it was our seniors that played that had no buisness playin.... slow and lazy are the wrds. this is u will see a HUGE change in that.
- Faclons Forever
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:18 pm
Re: Oak Hill '09
Yeah Oak Hill definitely has a big, strong, line, but what I noticed when they played Minford, as well as East and ND, is that they didn't have the speed. There were two runts from ND... #50 and #51, eating them up on defense (although the scoreboard didn't reflect it.) If Oak Hill wants to make playoffs they need to go at least 9-1 due to their weak schedule, and to do that they need to add speed to their size.