BC fans said that their kick coverage and punt coverage was their weak spots all year giving up a few TDs on the year. With the way they were playing D they probably figured why not just kick it short or out of bounds to limit SG opportunities of scoring. Just give SG the ball on the 35 or 40 and rely on their D to stop the Rebels.I agree 100%. Buckeye Central was easily the most complete team SG faced all year. Power running, solid passing, speed on defense. The only position where any of those teams probably have an edge is on the kid kicking off. Not sure what was up with that.
D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-2)
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:06 pm
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
-
- All State
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:57 am
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
You dropped Symmes Valley about 30 minutes away and you added Manchester about 2 hours away..... could someone explain this?
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:06 pm
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
Scheduling conflict due to the leagues the two teams are in. I heard the series will resume between the two in 2014.THE GOVENOR wrote:You dropped Symmes Valley about 30 minutes away and you added Manchester about 2 hours away..... could someone explain this?
- YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 25617
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: WAVERLY, OHIO
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
AT THE END OF THE DAY , THE SOUTH GALLIA REBELS STILL HAD AN AMAZING SEASON, AND CONGRATULATIONS.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 636
- Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:33 pm
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
Was not a schedualing conflict they dropped us.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
Who did SV pick up?s.v.vikinglinex2 wrote:Was not a schedualing conflict they dropped us.
- BRUTUS IS A BEAST
- All Conference
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:26 am
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
I was not impressed in what I saw from BC, I was expecting them to be able to do what they wanted through the air all night long but they had trouble even getting the ball off with the pressure we put on them all night. I don't believe that boy ran a 4.6 40 yard dash either.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:06 pm
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
BC will win the region rather convincingly and then meet up with one of the big boys. When that happens you will see the score flipped around to where they get beat by 30-40.BRUTUS IS A BEAST wrote:I was not impressed in what I saw from BC, I was expecting them to be able to do what they wanted through the air all night long but they had trouble even getting the ball off with the pressure we put on them all night. I don't believe that boy ran a 4.6 40 yard dash either.
- WitnessProtection
- All Conference
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:39 pm
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
I agree. The MercerVegas crew did a fine job. Hopefully, 2012 will bring another playoff run the Rebels' way.You're Tiger Bait wrote:AT THE END OF THE DAY , THE SOUTH GALLIA REBELS STILL HAD AN AMAZING SEASON, AND CONGRATULATIONS.
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
BRUTUS IS A BEAST wrote:I was not impressed in what I saw from BC, I was expecting them to be able to do what they wanted through the air all night long but they had trouble even getting the ball off with the pressure we put on them all night. I don't believe that boy ran a 4.6 40 yard dash either.
I guess they would have to put 80 up to impress you??? Wasn't it 43-0 ?
-
- SE
- Posts: 2278
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:43 pm
- WitnessProtection
- All Conference
- Posts: 978
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:39 pm
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
Need to take off those red & gold tinted glasses, Fred G. Give credit where it's due, man. 43-0. 'Nuff said.Fred G. Sanford wrote:I guess they would have to put 80 up to impress you??? Wasn't it 43-0 ?BRUTUS IS A BEAST wrote:I was not impressed in what I saw from BC, I was expecting them to be able to do what they wanted through the air all night long but they had trouble even getting the ball off with the pressure we put on them all night. I don't believe that boy ran a 4.6 40 yard dash either.
mtswngrvsg was impressed and he's not an easy man to impress.
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
Ol' Blue dont hand out compliments or impress very easily!!! As I said earlier BC is the best team that SG played this season and should be able to win the regionals!!! Sorry SV hope that you proove me wrong!!
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
Need to take off those red & gold tinted glasses, Fred G. Give credit where it's due, man. 43-0. 'Nuff said.
mtswngrvsg was impressed and he's not an easy man to impress.
Read the post! I'm the person asking how you couldn't be impressed by a team that won 43-0.
mtswngrvsg was impressed and he's not an easy man to impress.
Read the post! I'm the person asking how you couldn't be impressed by a team that won 43-0.
- BRUTUS IS A BEAST
- All Conference
- Posts: 931
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:26 am
Re: D VI R23 Qtrs: South Gallia (7-3) at Buckeye Central (8-
I wool stand by what I said about boy
Not.bring impressed. I thought we were suppose to get murdered by BC and they didn't even score a point in the first half. I thought that when we played River in 05 they had a lot better of a passing game and they were not even nearly as tall out wide, we also never got.in the backfield all night long top pressure their qb. I never once said that they are not the best team we played this year either.
Not.bring impressed. I thought we were suppose to get murdered by BC and they didn't even score a point in the first half. I thought that when we played River in 05 they had a lot better of a passing game and they were not even nearly as tall out wide, we also never got.in the backfield all night long top pressure their qb. I never once said that they are not the best team we played this year either.