Waterford 22 Trimble 0
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Nope. Dude got smoked.
Last edited by H2O4RD on Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Trimble probably wouldn't have scored at all without the bogus pass interference penalties in the end zone. Both were perfectly defended, defender making a play on the ball. Hopefully we only have to play against 11 this week.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 8:10 pm
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
H2O4RD wrote:Trimble probably wouldn't have scored at all without the bogus pass interference penalties in the end zone. Both were perfectly defended, defender making a play on the ball. Hopefully we only have to play against 11 this week.
There was blown coverage twice, and Trimble fumbled on their own 10 giving Waterford 3 scores basically. Congrats tho, good teams capitalize on mistakes and Waterford has a very good team, but your statement about playing against only 11 this week sounds like you're making excuses already if you happen to lose.
Go Cats, Go Buckeyes
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12986
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
- Dirty Sanchez
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:54 pm
- Location: Waiting for Lady Godivas to open
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Hilarious it is to have someone, ANYONE, from Waterford insinuating that officials at other schools cheat. Flat out hilarious. No matter the officials, Trimble will have to improve greatly on their game plan from the first game against Waterford. If not, the results will be the same.H2O4RD wrote:Trimble probably wouldn't have scored at all without the bogus pass interference penalties in the end zone. Both were perfectly defended, defender making a play on the ball. Hopefully we only have to play against 11 this week.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
I think this game will go one of 2 ways.
It will either come down to the last possession or it will be a 30 point win.
Gotta pull for Trimble and I do hope they win but I won't be shocked if Waterford does.
It will either come down to the last possession or it will be a 30 point win.
Gotta pull for Trimble and I do hope they win but I won't be shocked if Waterford does.
Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
When your corner is playing man coverage and the receiver runs a go route and the corner gets smoked and trails the receiver all the way to the endzone, thats not blown coverage. You could call it bad coverage, and I might agree. Or you could call it putting the kid in a bad position to defend. Playing man coverage because you cant stop the run is sometimes a necessary risk. Playing with fire will get you burned sometimes.
The second TD pass, against man, was thrown to the back who went in motion. Assuming that was the sam linebackers man, who was on a blitz, again not blown coverage. Qb made a good read and found the uncovered receiver. Actually it was probably man with a safety over the top now that i think about it.
Blown coverage is when a safety bites on a curl, and they throw it over him, corner plays flat when he has deep etc. That wasn't what happened here.
Doesn't really matter other than saying blown coverage somehow cheapens the touchdown, like it was a fluke and wasnt earned. Like it was given to us.
I expect to see a better team this time around, and you should too.
The second TD pass, against man, was thrown to the back who went in motion. Assuming that was the sam linebackers man, who was on a blitz, again not blown coverage. Qb made a good read and found the uncovered receiver. Actually it was probably man with a safety over the top now that i think about it.
Blown coverage is when a safety bites on a curl, and they throw it over him, corner plays flat when he has deep etc. That wasn't what happened here.
Doesn't really matter other than saying blown coverage somehow cheapens the touchdown, like it was a fluke and wasnt earned. Like it was given to us.
I expect to see a better team this time around, and you should too.
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 367
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:23 pm
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
First off the 1st TD defender fell down.The 2nd TD they lined up in twins did a crossing route and the defender didn't not pick him up he was so open QB probley was afraid he might over throw him, so I would say bad coverage not getting burned.Believe what you want to but that's what a lot of other people seen to.
cats
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.
Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Southern should have been up 14-7 at halftime. A fumble on the 9 and a phantom false start flag on the 1 that was thrown after Southern scored cost them a chance at winning. Trimble is in a down year for their standards therefore I look for a Waterford win by 20 this week.EasternDspy wrote:greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.
Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
I'm glad someone posted this, so I didn't have to be the one to say it. But yes, the officials had several suspect calls that killed Southern. The officials killed Southern when they played at Waterford too. We expected that, cause that is Waterford's M.O. But who would expect it to happen in a playoff game? Trimble is not very good right now, so I say Waterford is the better team. Timbles pass defense is horrid. They double covered Southern's best receiver all night with the same two players and they were never able to stop him, or make a play on the ball. So if the officials are neutral and Waterford can pass the ball they should win, but with the way these two coaches seem to be able to get the calls who knows?TVC wrote:Southern should have been up 14-7 at halftime. A fumble on the 9 and a phantom false start flag on the 1 that was thrown after Southern scored cost them a chance at winning. Trimble is in a down year for their standards therefore I look for a Waterford win by 20 this week.EasternDspy wrote:greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.
Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Apparently, the officials just handed the game to Trimble and they didn't actually do anything to win the game
Come on people, Trimble was better than Southern that night.
If Trimble is not that good, what does that say about Southern?? They did beat Southern twice this season.
Come on people, Trimble was better than Southern that night.
If Trimble is not that good, what does that say about Southern?? They did beat Southern twice this season.
Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Good luck this Basketball season Tornados!
Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:11 pm
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
I agree 100% . I thought Rosecrans was the best of the 4 road teams last week.EasternDspy wrote:greygoose wrote:Well round 2 of the playoffs and round 2 for these teams. Waterford really struggled in round 1 with #8 seed. Think this should be a really good game both teams will have learned and grown since last meeting. Going to take Waterford by a score in a low scoring affair.
Rosecrans was a good team they were better then Southern.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Reg 27: #1 Waterford vs #4 Trimble.
Well Rosecrans did beat HP. I think people have been under valuing them last 2 weeks.
Good Luck to the Wildcats
Good Luck to the Wildcats
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:28 am
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:11 pm