Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
I didn't see this thread anywhere, then I post a new thread and this one pops up, WEST should win this game. They are the healthiest they have been and now their offense is looking like it could be quite explosive on the ground and through the air. Having John Berry back on the defense made their already tough defense way better against perimeter runs and the pass.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
One factor you may not be considering is that against NW, Minford defense allowed the Mohawks to -27 yards, so the defense showed up. Minford's offense had 7 turnovers in the first half. If the Falcons cut out that nonsense, then it is a dominating win against the Mohawks. Same can be said for the S. Point game. Now entering league play, hopefully Minford has the TO bug out of their system and can take better care of the ball.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Minford had 7 turnovers against NW in the first half? That's incredibly hard to believe! Typo??Vladimir wrote:One factor you may not be considering is that against NW, Minford defense allowed the Mohawks to -27 yards, so the defense showed up. Minford's offense had 7 turnovers in the first half. If the Falcons cut out that nonsense, then it is a dominating win against the Mohawks. Same can be said for the S. Point game. Now entering league play, hopefully Minford has the TO bug out of their system and can take better care of the ball.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
That's according to the WNXT announcer, "7 turnovers in the half," and/or muffed C/QB exchanges. The Falcons fumbled into the endzone from the 2 yard line with a lineman falling on the ball, for the TD, to end the first half 13-0. I'm telling ya, they cut this out and they'll be competitive in the SOCII this year.The Oaf wrote:Minford had 7 turnovers against NW in the first half? That's incredibly hard to believe! Typo??Vladimir wrote:One factor you may not be considering is that against NW, Minford defense allowed the Mohawks to -27 yards, so the defense showed up. Minford's offense had 7 turnovers in the first half. If the Falcons cut out that nonsense, then it is a dominating win against the Mohawks. Same can be said for the S. Point game. Now entering league play, hopefully Minford has the TO bug out of their system and can take better care of the ball.
Last edited by vladimir on Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
That's 9 processions in a 24 minute half with 7 turnovers and 2 touchdowns assuming they didn't punt! I just about have to see a verifying link from somewhere before I'm believing that.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
No it's not9 possessions, b/c one actually counted for a touchdown. I did say 7 turnovers. Just 7 fumbles. My mistake.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Ok let's take it from the topVladimir wrote:No it's not9 possessions, b/c one actually counted for a touchdown. I didn't say 7 lost fumbles. Just 7 fumbles.
You clearly said 7 turnovers. If Minford had a lineman recover a fumble then they clearly had possession of the ball that ultimately ended in a touchdown. So that indeed takes us back 9 possessions. I'm still not buying it though.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Bottom line: You can't except to win a ball game putting the ball on the ground that often.Vladimir wrote:No it's not9 possessions, b/c one actually counted for a touchdown. I did say 7 turnovers. Just 7 fumbles. My mistake.
Daily times reported 5, WNXT announcer reported 7.Portsmouth Daily Times wrote: The Minford Falcons (3-1) are coming off a 25-0 win over the Northwest Mohawks. However, the game wasn’t as easy as the final score indicates. The Falcons fumbled the ball five times.
Last edited by vladimir on Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Now that we can agree on my friend!Vladimir wrote:Bottom line: You can't except to win a ball game putting the ball on the ground that often.Vladimir wrote:No it's not9 possessions, b/c one actually counted for a touchdown. I did say 7 turnovers. Just 7 fumbles. My mistake.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
80 percent chance of rain Friday. Used to look forward to rain because we never threw the ball. Now we throw it quite a bit.
I think West has a speed advantage. Minford has a size advantage. Wonder what effect substantial rain would have on the game?
I think West has a speed advantage. Minford has a size advantage. Wonder what effect substantial rain would have on the game?
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
From the sound of Minford posters, Minford has trouble holding onto the football...The rain won't help them in that area...Advantage West in the monsoon...
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
The Oaf wrote:Ok let's take it from the topVladimir wrote:No it's not9 possessions, b/c one actually counted for a touchdown. I didn't say 7 lost fumbles. Just 7 fumbles.
You clearly said 7 turnovers. If Minford had a lineman recover a fumble then they clearly had possession of the ball that ultimately ended in a touchdown. So that indeed takes us back 9 possessions. I'm still not buying it though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Another note, Minford had the ball @ the 30 to start the last drive of the half. it took them 10 plays to score on the fumble recovery in the endzone. If not for the fumble, I am wondering if they would have scored at all.
On a positive note, Minford has a good punt returner. He may be a little too brave, but I like it.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Throwing the ball and completing them is two different stories. West has yet to complete passes against a good team on a regular basis.Westfan wrote:80 percent chance of rain Friday. Used to look forward to rain because we never threw the ball. Now we throw it quite a bit.
I think West has a speed advantage. Minford has a size advantage. Wonder what effect substantial rain would have on the game?
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Other than the Newark Catholic game, West's completion percentage has been really good. Also one of the two best receivers was out till last week.
Regardless no team is going to throw the ball well on a wet grass field in the rain; which was the original thought.
Regardless no team is going to throw the ball well on a wet grass field in the rain; which was the original thought.
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
What does it matter it took Minford 10 plays to score and wonder if not for a fumble recovery for a td, if they would be able to score. I thought with Minford's offense and most offenses out there. If you could grind out many plays on possession, to gain a td, wouldn't you be controlling the clock and wearing out your opponent instead of quick scores allowing plenty of time for your opponents to answer.
It should be a good game in Minford, but I'm rooting for the Falcons 21-14.
It should be a good game in Minford, but I'm rooting for the Falcons 21-14.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
It wasn't controlling the clock at all. Trust me. It was lack of execution.
It wasn't controlling the clock at all. Trust me. It was lack of execution.
- local superstar
- All State
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:56 pm
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Good luck to both. Regardless the perennial powerhouse of Minford will go down Friday.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
local superstar wrote:Good luck to both. Regardless the perennial powerhouse of Minford will go down Friday.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6462b/6462b8dfdfeacc85caa7b37b3cc500df8f790533" alt="Laughing :lol:"
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:00 pm
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Don't think I would bet any bones either way! always a good game!
Re: Portsmouth West 3-2 vs. Minford 4-1
Minford 21-14......................If they can cut out the fumbling....no turnovers......