Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post Reply
User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 286950
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by noreply66 »

Dandy Don wrote:
Logan grad wrote:I get annoyed by the numbers argument so much!! Not every boy at Logan plays football!! They have just as many kids on the team as both Jackson and DeSales. And DeSales can recruit. Sorry but they can. Just bc you have 1000 boys doesnt mean you have 900 on the team. I hate that analogy.
Wow, you don't like the numbers argument? May want to talk with OHSAA about that since they created 7 football divisions in order to try and create an equal playing field due to numbers and numbers alone.

Follow that up with not every boy plays football at Logan...news flash not every boy at every school plays football. Apparently less boys play football at Logan than other places? Spare me the square miles argument please.

Logan has 467 boys. Here are some numbers for you.

Logan is 63% bigger than Athens.
Logan is 138% bigger than Meigs.
Logan is 102% bigger than Cambridge.
Logan is 220% bigger than Nelsonville (errrr I mean NY).
Logan is 386% bigger than Shadyside.
Logan is 60% bigger than Jackson.
Logan is 58% bigger than DeSales.
Logan is 112% bigger than Gallia.
Logan is 61% bigger than Warren.

Congrats, Logan and Teays Valley are same size.

Logan is on average of your nine opponents listed above (less TV) 133% larger than any of them. Count TV and that average drops to 120% larger than your schedule for this year.

So, why don't all you Chieftain Envy tribe members go play some one that is on average more than twice your size? Schedule some schools with 800-900 boys I mean come on guys do the same thing you want NY and Shadyside to do, isn't that fair?

Cue the haters that will ignore the facts.
Once again handy dawn tells half the story...Must think she is the smartest one on here. Just keeps on showing us half of everything....just hope you don't do this in public.........my eyes couldn't take it. :lol: :lol:


User avatar
1987chieftains
SEOPS H
Posts: 7660
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by 1987chieftains »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
i had some free time.


moonshine
SEO
Posts: 2925
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:12 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by moonshine »

It is not about numbers it is participation! If your school is unhappy about Logan then stop scheduling Logan BUT I bet your school likes the money too much! So stop your Bitc*****!


ucantcme
Freshman Team
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by ucantcme »

If ya dont like playing Logan dont schedule them then get on here and cry about it. raise heck with your AD, Not Logan.. Ok, I saw where Sheets is playing at Meigs. Here is a young man that has not played at the same high school two years in a row since he started high school. Is the system being manipulated by his parents or is the OHSAA just turning a blind eye to this because it doesnt matter in SEO?


Whodey
Freshman Team
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:14 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by Whodey »

No one is suggesting not playing Logan or boycotting them lol, I always fail to understand when presented with facts people get emotional and present emotional arguments. It is simply numbers of boys available to play that determines Divisions.

OHSAA understands that generally speaking the number of boys (or girls for that matter) has a correlation to athletes available and thus has established the Divisions they have and that fluctuates each year. Logan has an advantage in numbers of possible athletes and therefor should have an advantage in almost everyone they play based on their schedule, it really is not that hard to grasp. Whoever went through the population and number of high school exercise lol well that is just silly...the number of boys/girls is already known. Population and number of HS's has nothing to do with nothing, each school reports the real number of boys/girls. They don't report population lol or how many HS's are in their county.

Since this is a Meigs thread let's get back on topic somewhat. Logan/Pomeroy is about 60 minutes between cities and Logan is 138% bigger. Instead of scheduling Pickerington Central which is only 35 minutes the other way and Pickerington Central is only 35% larger than Logan. Interesting that Logan likes to travel one hour east or south but doesn't like to travel one hour (or less lol) west.

Quit running your chops about the weak TVC. If you can't walk the walk don't talk the talk.

TVC Athens, Meigs, NY scheduled up to Logan. Who has the mighty Chieftains scheduled up to...D7 Shadyside?

Keep talking the talk...and playing people 1/2 your size.
Last edited by Whodey on Thu Sep 10, 2015 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.


moonshine
SEO
Posts: 2925
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:12 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by moonshine »

Trenchfoot wrote:
C-Bolt wrote:Yep would have been another nailbiter this year I bet,Lancaster is pretty good this year so they might have lost again, but it would have been great preparation for games down the road when things get a lot tougher.Like Paldi says you got to play better teams to get better.
:122246 :122245 :122248
Yea but the bullpuppies was the state DIII Runner Up! Back to the subject, Why is the Sheet's kid playing, should have sat out 5 games?


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4139
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by loganlocos »

Don't feed the trolls.


ucantcme
Freshman Team
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:05 am

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by ucantcme »

Yea but the bullpuppies was the state DIII Runner Up! Back to the subject, Why is the Sheet's kid playing, should have sat out 5 games?
Freshman year (Fed Hock)
Sophomore year (meigs)
Junior year (Wahama)
Senior year (Meigs)

Games set out = 0

How is this fair to those who've had to sit out their games. Young man from Trimble had to sit out 5 last season and he even lived in the district.


User avatar
ONE OF A KIND
Varsity
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:29 am

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by ONE OF A KIND »

C-Bolt wrote:Yep would have been another nailbiter this year I bet,Lancaster is pretty good this year so they might have lost again, but it would have been great preparation for games down the road when things get a lot tougher.Like Paldi says you got to play better teams to get better.
I have to agree with your idol on this. Looks like that's what the TVC teams are doing by scheduling Logan, but Logan is doing the opposite by scheduling all of them, and running from Lancaster. :mrgreen:


User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 286950
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by noreply66 »

Did the grounded duck just something :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8


moonshine
SEO
Posts: 2925
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:12 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by moonshine »

noreply66 wrote:Did the grounded duck just something :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8

Man That was grounded chuck always talking about a 3 headed thing!


moonshine
SEO
Posts: 2925
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:12 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by moonshine »

ucantcme wrote:
Yea but the bullpuppies was the state DIII Runner Up! Back to the subject, Why is the Sheet's kid playing, should have sat out 5 games?
Freshman year (Fed Hock)
Sophomore year (meigs)
Junior year (Wahama)
Senior year (Meigs)

Games set out = 0

How is this fair to those who've had to sit out their games. Young man from Trimble had to sit out 5 last season and he even lived in the district.
Sounds like recruiting!


Bighitsinc
Varsity
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by Bighitsinc »

ucantcme wrote:
Yea but the bullpuppies was the state DIII Runner Up! Back to the subject, Why is the Sheet's kid playing, should have sat out 5 games?
Freshman year (Fed Hock)
Sophomore year (meigs)
Junior year (Wahama)
Senior year (Meigs)

Games set out = 0

How is this fair to those who've had to sit out their games. Young man from Trimble had to sit out 5 last season and he even lived in the district.
Isn't this exactly what the OHSAA wants to not allow to happen


Whodey
Freshman Team
Posts: 170
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 2:14 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by Whodey »

LoganLocos wrote:Don't feed the trolls.
But do feed big fish Logan with small fish...all the while making fun of the little fish by Chief Paladin, ruler of the Chieftain Envy Tribe.

Good luck to TVC Meigs as they step up and play Logan this week...should be a good game.


96stroker
Varsity
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:33 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by 96stroker »

just checking is this topic about Logan vs Meigs or just people crying about different sizes come on lets here about the football teams that will b trying to go to 3-0 on Friday


User avatar
Raider6309
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12993
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Athens

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by Raider6309 »

moonshine wrote:It is not about numbers it is participation! If your school is unhappy about Logan then stop scheduling Logan BUT I bet your school likes the money too much! So stop your Bitc*****!
"Athens only wins because they are in the TVC." Every Logan person has done it the last 5 years to Athens. So quit your bitc****


Bighitsinc
Varsity
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by Bighitsinc »

96STROKER wrote:just checking is this topic about Logan vs Meigs or just people crying about different sizes come on lets here about the football teams that will b trying to go to 3-0 on Friday

I can't find one poster to this thread from Meigs.


User avatar
ONE OF A KIND
Varsity
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:29 am

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by ONE OF A KIND »

noreply66 wrote:Did the grounded duck just something :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8
moonshine wrote:
noreply66 wrote:Did the grounded duck just something :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8

Man That was grounded chuck always talking about a 3 headed thing!
66 what's laughable is that dagger in the heart of Paladin and all his cronies like you and moonwalk. Your beloved Chiefs dodged Lancaster and picked up a D7 school. You clowns made fun of the TVC calling them cowards, and dubbing Athens "cut-n-run." Then those dad gum folks in charge at Logan went and did the same thing you make fun of the TVC for supposedly doing. OUCH! That has to hurt. :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: So go ahead girls and keep dodging that point the way Logan has been dodging competition. It's fun to watch. Now hurry along and pm Paladin to get another joke to post so you don't have to respond to what hurts you the most.

:aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by Paladin »

My 2 cents -- the numbers argument is bogus. There are a lot of idiots in SEO and one has spoken to try to belittle Logan. Facts are it takes TWO to make a contract to play. And most coaches ( who run good programs) are looking at computer points, competitive level and value in playing someone, their size not being a major deal. I am and remain vocal about playing Lancaster because they have always had a competitive advantage -- not in size but in feeder programs with multiple Jr. Hi teams feeding the high school. Its a MAJOR advantage when you play someone who has only ONE Jr Hi. Thats why many coaches agree to play bigger ( or smaller) teams that have only ONE Jr. Hi feeder. Competition. Logan scheduled and played a superior team from up North in little Loudonville and anyone who saw them play knew they could play with many D-I teams as a d- 6/7 team. Shadyside is similar. On the other side , I don't like playing N-Y and thats from a competitive standpoint as well , not size. History shows the Logan -Nelsonville match up was a HUGE loser for the Greyhounds ( how long since you heard that ? lol ) and even after the consolidation to N-Y it has remained lopsided with N-Y sometimes getting a win here and there. No need talking about what is recognized state-wide -- the TVC is a horrible weak league, has been and probably always will be. Scheduling is about playing competition, up or down but someone who BOTH will benefit from. The track record in SEO remains obvious to most of the state -- most people down there avoid competitio n except for a handful of teams who play to get better with good competition, no matter how big or small it is. The old saying says it best -- its not the size of the dog in the fight , its the size of the fight in the dog. Yet you want a fair, competitve fight by trying to match competitive programs with like teams , no matter the school sizes.

Logan can't be shamed. When you play bigger OCC teams, Pariochials and powerhouses from smaller divisions, you do what is good for your program. Chieftain envy is alive and well and often rears its ugly head. Pay no attention. Typical SEO B.S. to be ignored.


User avatar
ONE OF A KIND
Varsity
Posts: 593
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:29 am

Re: Week 3 Meigs vs. Logan

Post by ONE OF A KIND »

Paladin wrote:My 2 cents -- the numbers argument is bogus. There are a lot of idiots in SEO and one has spoken to try to belittle Logan. Facts are it takes TWO to make a contract to play. And most coaches ( who run good programs) are looking at computer points, competitive level and value in playing someone, their size not being a major deal. I am and remain vocal about playing Lancaster because they have always had a competitive advantage -- not in size but in feeder programs with multiple Jr. Hi teams feeding the high school. Its a MAJOR advantage when you play someone who has only ONE Jr Hi. Thats why many coaches agree to play bigger ( or smaller) teams that have only ONE Jr. Hi feeder. Competition. Logan scheduled and played a superior team from up North in little Loudonville and anyone who saw them play knew they could play with many D-I teams as a d- 6/7 team. Shadyside is similar. On the other side , I don't like playing N-Y and thats from a competitive standpoint as well , not size. History shows the Logan -Nelsonville match up was a HUGE loser for the Greyhounds ( how long since you heard that ? lol ) and even after the consolidation to N-Y it has remained lopsided with N-Y sometimes getting a win here and there. No need talking about what is recognized state-wide -- the TVC is a horrible weak league, has been and probably always will be. Scheduling is about playing competition, up or down but someone who BOTH will benefit from. The track record in SEO remains obvious to most of the state -- most people down there avoid competitio n except for a handful of teams who play to get better with good competition, no matter how big or small it is. The old saying says it best -- its not the size of the dog in the fight , its the size of the fight in the dog. Yet you want a fair, competitve fight by trying to match competitive programs with like teams , no matter the school sizes.

Logan can't be shamed. When you play bigger OCC teams, Pariochials and powerhouses from smaller divisions, you do what is good for your program. Chieftain envy is alive and well and often rears its ugly head. Pay no attention. Typical SEO B.S. to be ignored.
That's it? That's your lameassed response to your dagger? Obviously you were too weak to ignore this ugly truth that will haunt you and your underlings for years to come. You had to respond cause you know it's the truth. But weak fat boy, very weak. Do you admit to "most of the state" that you are from a school that runs from competition? :lol: :mrgreen: :lol:


Post Reply

Return to “Football”