ahhhh... another comment from the peanut gallery.seofan_via_dublin wrote:Not defending by putting down yours, putting down yours because you have no interest in ours but still insist on inserting your two cents.
Buckeyes fans don't sit on their emotions when outsiders want to interject their issues.
Also, nothing he said was wrong!
No actually, the sad thing is, I root for WVU. But how can you jump on a Buckeye thread and constantly dog them? Overrated in what way? If winning your conference title 5 years in a row with a good shot of 6 coming this year, what is there that is overrated? How many Big East Titles has WVU won in the last 20 YEARS? I don't have the facts in front of me, but I guarantee it's not 6, and i did say the LAST 20 YEARS.Raiderball wrote:bigtimehitter wrote:Torrence got picked on and picked and picked on, he then got to do his own pic'n. That changed the whole game. Nice to finally see the o-line open up some holes and play they like they should have been and Herron ran hard. I think the most underrated guy on the entire on either side of the ball is Zach Boren, guy is a mauler. without him smashing the backers, our running game is no where booty effective as it was tonight.
And now Raiderball. Where do I start?? Overrated? I know that if i rooted for a powerhouse such as WVU, I don't know if i would rag on a top tier team that is in a BCS bowl every year.
Especially when my team was 1-2 in conference play in the brutal Big East, thats tough sleddin. But they did take out a very dangerous Cinci team tonight, very impressive.
I guess the silver lining on that cloud is, when you're a Mountaineer fan, you never have to worry about your team being overhyped or overrated, because hell, no one expects anything from WVU. In all seriousnesss though, good luck to the Mountaineers in that brutal confrence play, it's a war of attrition with those top flight programs.
Is that all you got? Defending your team by putting down someone else's team? That's all any of you can do. :aaaaa8
seofan_via_dublin wrote:The team needs to run the offense that works best for them, not the offense that is the flavor of the week. If the spread option or another O worked better, then run it.
But over and over again, it's been proven that the Buckeyes play better and get more production when they play from under center and play running back focused run first smash mouth football.
ManitouDan wrote:seofan_via_dublin wrote:The team needs to run the offense that works best for them, not the offense that is the flavor of the week. If the spread option or another O worked better, then run it.
But over and over again, it's been proven that the Buckeyes play better and get more production when they play from under center and play running back focused run first smash mouth football.
Fine for the 60's model of football the big ten plays but has shown to be a losing stratergy when placed up against modern spread offensive teams. (from the SEC) :122245 MD
seofan_via_dublin wrote:No, raiderball, you are the peanut gallery.
You have no concern with the buckeyes, until you want to stir a pot.
Once you say inflammatory things, you get all mad when the faithfull bring up WVU.
....The Big Ten is not very good from top to bottom...Some things I noticed from the OSU game......Worst Penn State team (albeit injured and beaten up) I have ever seen. How would OSU defend these schemes,athletes, and coaching talents in the SEC....NOT very well...to say the least...And if you are one who thinks OSU should and could line up in an I. and run TB iso and be successful against ANYONE who can play,you are absolutely out of your gourd...I really thought Pryor looked great running outside zone read,and that scheme was the key to the outstanding 98 yard drive which turned the game around...Watching OSU throw the ball is embarrassing...Their scheme is so horrible and Terrelle gets exposed because of this and his inability to make any throw besides gunning it down the field.Georgia is barely over .500 and lost to 4-6 Colorado. Yeah, Georgia is so tough. Penn State was playing their best football of the year, and had lost at Iowa and at Alabama for two of their three losses.The General wrote:Granted...Auburn is a little questionable in the back end of their D...BUT....Do any OSU homers EVER check out or even understand the quality of the offenses they play in the SEC...Aaron Murray is very young...but he would easily be the top QB in the TEN....AJ Green?...The point is there are a lot of great players and schemes...To think or say that Penn State is better than Georgia is downright hilarious...
Wasn't necessary though. I have a couple sites bookmarked with all that information available. Anything else you would like to know about the Mountaineers though? Is that the same Iowa team that was lucky to beat Indiana and lost to Northwestern?Orestes wrote:Georgia is barely over .500 and lost to 4-6 Colorado. Yeah, Georgia is so tough. Penn State was playing their best football of the year, and had lost at Iowa and at Alabama for two of their three losses.The General wrote:Granted...Auburn is a little questionable in the back end of their D...BUT....Do any OSU homers EVER check out or even understand the quality of the offenses they play in the SEC...Aaron Murray is very young...but he would easily be the top QB in the TEN....AJ Green?...The point is there are a lot of great players and schemes...To think or say that Penn State is better than Georgia is downright hilarious...
Ohio State is scoring 40+ points per game. They are doing something right on offense.
Oh the "..." the replacement for lacking knowledge in basic English mechanics.
