Page 1 of 1

The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:36 am
by fightingtigers45
How would it be set up?

The easiest way? BCS conference winners and two at-large.


1. Alabama vs. 8. Georgia Tech

4. TCU vs. 5. Florida


2. Texas vs. 7. Ohio State

3. Cincinnati vs. 6. Oregon


I still see it coming down to Texas vs. Alabama

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:42 am
by fightingtigers45
Another I like would be having 12 teams...6 conference winners plus 6 at-large.

Teams:

Alabama, Texas, Cincinnati, Ohio State, Oregon, Georgia Tech = automatic
TCU, Florida, Boise State, Iowa, Virginia Tech, LSU = at-large

First round bye for: Alabama, Texas, Cincinnati, TCU

First round matchups:

11. Virginia Tech vs. 12. LSU for right to play 1. Alabama

9. Georgia Tech vs. 10. Iowa for right to play 2. Texas

7. Oregon vs. 8. Ohio State for right to play 3. Cincinnati

5. Florida vs. 6. Boise State for right to play 4. TCU

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:44 am
by fightingtigers45
fightingtigers45 wrote:Another I like would be having 12 teams...6 conference winners plus 6 at-large.

Teams:

Alabama, Texas, Cincinnati, Ohio State, Oregon, Georgia Tech = automatic
TCU, Florida, Boise State, Iowa, Virginia Tech, LSU = at-large

First round bye for: Alabama, Texas, Cincinnati, TCU

First round matchups:

11. Virginia Tech vs. 12. LSU for right to play 1. Alabama

9. Georgia Tech vs. 10. Iowa for right to play 2. Texas

7. Oregon vs. 8. Ohio State for right to play 3. Cincinnati

5. Florida vs. 6. Boise State for right to play 4. TCU


With this system...I would see it coming down to:

LSU vs. Alabama

Florida vs. TCU

Georgia Tech vs. Texas

Oregon/Ohio State vs. Cincinnati


Final Four:

Alabama vs. Florida

Texas vs. Oregon/Ohio State



Title game: Alabama vs. Texas...Although Id love to see Florida play Bama again.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:30 am
by west siders
Here is what I think you could put the 6 BCS Conference winners in along with 2 At-large bids. This would create controversy though because it would be a tough choice between Boise and Florida Getting the final Playoff spot. I would take Boise State though since they are undeafeated and Florida already had their chance and Blew it. The higher seeds would get the automatic home playoff game for the first round only.



#1 Alabama vs. #8 Ohio State @ Alabama
----winners play each other in Semifinal @Neutral Site
#4 TCU vs #9 Georgia Tech @ TCU

--------------Winners of each Semifinal play in the championship @ neutral Site

#2 Texas Vs.#7 Oregon @ Texas
-----------Winners Play in Semifinal Winners play @ Neutral site
#3 Cincinnati Vs. #6 Boise State @ Cincinnati

This would create a lot of excitement with a possible rematch in the semifinals between Boise and Oregon for the right to play in the Championship.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:32 am
by fightingtigers45
west siders wrote:That would be great here is what I think

I would put the 6 BCS conference winners and 6 at large picks all in the tournament. so that would put together these matchups

#1 Alabama vs. #12 LSU

#2 Texas vs. #11 Virginia Tech

#3 Cincinnati vs. #10 Iowa

#4 TCU vs. #9 Georgia Tech

#5 Florida vs. #8 Ohio State Buckeyes

#6 Boise State vs. #7 Oregon

This would be an exciting bracket of teams to watch play in a win or go home plus two good rematches


What happens after that? Then you have 6 teams. Do you rebracket? Give a bye? Makes no sense.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:51 pm
by Peake
More then 4 teams would be too many. For one, the unique thing about college football is that every week really matters. IMO anyone outside of the top 4-5 really does not deserve a shot at the National Title.

The Bowl system would fight this tooth and nail, so basically you allow all of the BCS Bowls continue to exist and still get quality teams.

The first two rounds will be played during the last week of bowl week, and then the National Title to be played a week later.

NCAA Playoff

#1 Bama v #4 Cincinnati
#2 Texas v #3 TCU

Title Game
#1 Bama v #2 Texas---Texas***

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:21 am
by fightingtigers45
peake wrote:More then 4 teams would be too many. For one, the unique thing about college football is that every week really matters. IMO anyone outside of the top 4-5 really does not deserve a shot at the National Title.

The Bowl system would fight this tooth and nail, so basically you allow all of the BCS Bowls continue to exist and still get quality teams.

The first two rounds will be played during the last week of bowl week, and then the National Title to be played a week later.

NCAA Playoff

#1 Bama v #4 Cincinnati
#2 Texas v #3 TCU

Title Game
#1 Bama v #2 Texas---Texas***


There will still be a lot of complaints even if this happens. Do Florida and Boise not get any love?

I have never been in favor of a playoff for the exact reason you mentioned above. The regular season is the playoff in my eyes. Imagine if there was an 8 team playoff...the SEC title game would have had absolutely zero hype. None. Imagine the OSU/USC game early. Doesnt mean as much. The regular season in college football is BY FAR the best regular season of ANY sport.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:43 am
by Peake
I agree but hince the reason you take the top 4. Basically the same still applies with the SEC Title game. You win you are in, you lose you are out. Two loss teams do not deserve to play for national titles (exception LSU), but 4 teams is by far the most efficent. There will always be complaints, no number of teams you allow in will change that, but if you allow the top 8 or more in, the regular season means less.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:15 am
by fightingtigers45
peake wrote:I agree but hince the reason you take the top 4. Basically the same still applies with the SEC Title game. You win you are in, you lose you are out. Two loss teams do not deserve to play for national titles (exception LSU), but 4 teams is by far the most efficent. There will always be complaints, no number of teams you allow in will change that, but if you allow the top 8 or more in, the regular season means less.


Four would be the most efficient. I would agree to that.

I have always been against a playoff for a myriad of reasons. One of the biggest is because there is no one great system to go to.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:50 pm
by seofan_via_dublin
This season, in isolation, why not this:

#1 Bama vs winner of TCU/Boise play-in game
#2 Texas vs #3 Cincy

Expand the BCS system to include the Cotton Bowl, played at Cowboys stadium in Dallas

Play the TCU vs Boise game as a play-in game on Dec. 26
Bama plays the winner on Jan. 1 in Dallas at the Cotton Bowl
Texas plays Cincy on Jan. 1 in Scottsdale at the Fiesta Bowl.
Championship is played on Jan 9th, that way it's a saturday prime time game.

Now, the rest of the BCS bowls get:
Oregon vs OSU in Rose
Florida vs. Loser of the play in game in Sugar
Georgia Tech vs. At-large (in this case Iowa) in the Orange

You could also make this a permanent fix, and have the top 5 teams playoff in this style every year.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:53 pm
by Orange and Brown
32 teams! Thats the best way to do it

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:40 pm
by claypantherfan
I think if they would have a college football play offs they should have maybe 25 teams and give the 1 seed a first round bye so that way it is rewarding to be in the top 25 in the season

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 6:37 pm
by The_Legend_of_Northwest
i agree with peake and think that no more than 4 teams should be involved. this year has been crazy with 5 undefeated teams that is very rare. could somebody look up how many times that has happened.

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:34 pm
by Go Bucks!
Keep the BCS rankings as is with the top 8 playing a playoff. 1st Saturday in December would be played on #1-4 home field....winners play on Jan 1st with a Championship game played on the next Saturday night.

Matchups:
#8 Ohio State @ #1 Alabama
#7 Oregon @ #2 Texas
#6 Boise State @ #3 Cincinnati
#5 Florida @ #4 TCU

Re: The 2009 CFB Playoff

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:07 am
by Peake
8 is too many. Why? Because the bowl system would never have it. The bowls would not join the playoff series, just would not happen.

The Rose Bowl is not going to want 2nd place Stanford v 2nd place Iowa if they can get USC or Ohio State. Go back to 2006. Michigan, USC, and Ohio State were all in the top 4. So the Rose Bowl would have been stuck with 3rd place Wisconsin v 2nd place Cal instead of cash cows Michigan and USC. Ratings and money mean a lot in colleg football.