Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

svbt1112
Varsity
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:54 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by svbt1112 »

http://www.seodab.org/brackets/2011/201 ... lendar.pdf


According to this latest press release the winner moves on to the Convo on March 10th and not March 8th.


sinjinian
Freshman Team
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:23 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by sinjinian »

Any word on whether Fairfield's point guard Quentin Williams will be playing against Portsmouth Clay? I heard he had nose surgery last week.


run-n-gun
Varsity
Posts: 617
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by run-n-gun »

I haven't seen Fairfield play, but if they aren't deep and can run, they have no chance at beating Clay.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 31243
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by Ironman92 »

Is New Boston deep?

Is Green deep?


rockyraccoon
All Conference
Posts: 764
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by rockyraccoon »

Green got the three seed. I suppose every loss that Fairfield had was to D3 #1 seeds? Clay has 6 starting seniors who are going to leave it all on the floor tomorrow night. Fairfield is going to have their hands full trying to contain all of them.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 31243
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by Ironman92 »

No doubt about any of that. I just don't understand the if they aren't deep and and can run statement. The best D4 teams of the past decade were typically only 6-7 deep.


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by TribeManiac10 »

rockyraccoon wrote:Green got the three seed. I suppose every loss that Fairfield had was to D3 #1 seeds? Clay has 6 starting seniors who are going to leave it all on the floor tomorrow night. Fairfield is going to have their hands full trying to contain all of them.
It would be bad for Clay to start the game off getting a penalty for having one too many players on the floor :122249. Seriously though, this should be a great matchup. Fairfield has one of the best players in the entire district in Cox but the play of their gaurds should decide the outcome of this one. Williams being able to play will be a big factor.


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by TribeManiac10 »

Ironman92 wrote:No doubt about any of that. I just don't understand the if they aren't deep and and can run statement. The best D4 teams of the past decade were typically only 6-7 deep.
Peebles did alright last year playing 7.


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 31243
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by Ironman92 »

Whiteoak went to the Final 4 with 7 and Elite 8 with 6.


rockyraccoon
All Conference
Posts: 764
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by rockyraccoon »

Clay has a couple of other players who come off the bench and play good role postitions. A lights out three point shooter and a couple of good ball handler, so I would put them at at least 8 deep.


jeremyghs05
Waterboy
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:44 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by jeremyghs05 »

Green is 6 deep!


Eaglesnest
All State
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 12:56 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by Eaglesnest »

Good luck Panthers!


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 31243
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by Ironman92 »

Fairfield 58
Clay 48

Final


User avatar
TribeManiac10
SEOP
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by TribeManiac10 »

Congrats to the lions! Was Williams able to play in this one?


sinjinian
Freshman Team
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:23 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by sinjinian »

Williams did play limited minutes with a mask. 14-12 at halftime, one of the worst first halves I have seen. Cox got more involved in the offense in the 2nd half and Fairfield pulled away.


OZZIEOHIO
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8384
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:21 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by OZZIEOHIO »

We thought number 22 for clay was hitting good in the second half, why didnt clay set him some picks to get him more shots???


fhs_shl11
Freshman Team
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:24 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by fhs_shl11 »

run-n-gun wrote:I haven't seen Fairfield play, but if they aren't deep and can run, they have no chance at beating Clay.
Even after the game I still do not understand this comment... Fairfields "9th man" scored 4 critical points in the 3rd quarter...looks like they were deep. Also Fairfield scored over 40 points in second half...looks like they ran a lot on clay.


rockyraccoon
All Conference
Posts: 764
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:17 pm

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by rockyraccoon »

OZZIEOHIO wrote:We thought number 22 for clay was hitting good in the second half, why didnt clay set him some picks to get him more shots???
One of Clay's downfall throughout the season is not feeding the hot shooter. I thought their main problem tonight was going away from the zone defense and going into man to man. Both times they did, Fairfield went on big runs. Fairfield was way too much faster than Clay overall, and man to man match-ups weren't there. In zone, I thought they played them pretty even. I haven't heard what Fairfields shooting percentage was, but it wasn't very good from outside the paint.


bucki4life
Freshman Team
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:05 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by bucki4life »

you could have played zone and they would have just held the ball - you always go man when you are trying to get back in a game!!!


User avatar
THE_MOOSE_IS_LOOSE
Riding the Bench
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:09 am

Re: Fairfield (8-9) #5 vs. Clay (11-8) #4 @ Valley HS 3/1

Post by THE_MOOSE_IS_LOOSE »

^^^ agreed... have to play man (usually)... but i guess the way FF was launching 3's all game the zone could have worked... classic game last night in lucasveal


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”