South Webster @ Clay
-
- All State
- Posts: 1444
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 12:56 pm
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: South Webster @ Clay
I think this is a game where you throw records out the door. South Webster has played a mean schedule and that can only make you better. Clay might not have won 2 games playing Webster's schedule so far. Should be an interesting game - could go either way at Clay but if game was at South Webster - I think Webster would be a 7-10 pt favorite.
- claypantherfan
- All State
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:45 pm
Re: South Webster @ Clay
This game is usually a good game every year that he boys look forward to in the locker room
- basketballparent
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 2:00 pm
Re: South Webster @ Clay
they played in previews against each other n clay came away with the victory but not by a large margin i think they won by 6 maybe if not less.
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm
Re: South Webster @ Clay
I think this will be a pretty good game. Webster and Clay have played some good ones over the years...definitely a late season non-conference game that is good for both teams.
Like others have said, Webster has played a TOUGH schedule this year. They are just overmatched in SOC II. But they have already beat one of the better SOC I teams on the road (East), so I'd think they'll be competitive in this one. This game could have an impact on the tourney seeding tomorrow.*
Like others have said, Webster has played a TOUGH schedule this year. They are just overmatched in SOC II. But they have already beat one of the better SOC I teams on the road (East), so I'd think they'll be competitive in this one. This game could have an impact on the tourney seeding tomorrow.*
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:12 pm
Re: South Webster @ Clay
turnovers,missed foulshots,poor defense=loss
south webster just out played us.
south webster just out played us.
Last edited by rosemount rebel on Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- SE
- Posts: 2385
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:26 am
- Location: Beaver
Re: South Webster @ Clay
Big loss for Clay tonight in terms of tourney seeding.......I really thought they had a legitimate shot at a #6 seed until tonight........Looks like anywhere from a #7 thru #10 after being blown out.With a win tonight,they could have got the 6 seed and would have only had to win 1 game to get to the Convo.......Now you know if they get by there 1st tourney game,the sectional championship will be tough......they will be looking at playing the #1 or #2 seed in sectional title if they are fortunate enough to get by the first game......Huge loss for the Panthers IMO!
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm
Re: South Webster @ Clay
NICE win for the Jeeps. I figured they had a solid chance of winning this one, but by 30pts on the road?? Has to give them some confidence with the tourney coming up.*
Re: South Webster @ Clay
Huge win. Clay may have had an off night which might explain the deficit. I don't know since I have neer seen Clay play. But I have seen South Webster play and they are alot better than people had let on. They gave Valley all they could handle when I saw them. For the Jeeps to play the schedule they play, it will do nothing but good when they get into the tournament.
- cbaseball33
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:31 am
Re: South Webster @ Clay
clay will get the #6 or #7 seed and will have to play two games to get to the convo. if it falls like we think then they will play #11 seed then #3 seed
Re: South Webster @ Clay
Wow, how many slip ups is coach T gonna make?
That seemed like an obvious move to switch to zone when they were out scored by 19!!!!!!
That was just plain nonsense
That seemed like an obvious move to switch to zone when they were out scored by 19!!!!!!
That was just plain nonsense
Re: South Webster @ Clay
i also heard that 2 players that have played under him the past 2 years "1 of them being a captian" suggested at halftime they go zone. the come out the 3rd quarter and run a 2-3 for 1 possesion then rite back 2 man defense. doesnt make since why he wouldnt atleast give the zone a fair shot?