Tobias wrote:Congrats on District Title #35, Portsmouth!
Now that's impressive. Let's just hope they don't get another Regional title.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eb05/3eb05984ed1c87c0b93389aa696b194ff7538f43" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
But if they do you can bet I will be cheering them on at the finals.
Tobias wrote:Congrats on District Title #35, Portsmouth!
Thanks for your opinion...but Fairland was still the #1 seed and Portsmouth was the #2 seed...just the FACTS.Burg_Grad_77 wrote:Okay, lets take a look at the facts.Who cares who the favorite was? The facts are this: Fairland was the #1 seed and Portsmouth was the #2 seed. Where are your facts to say any different? You saying Fairland would have been a 5th or 6th seed in Jackson is your opinion...and you know what they say about opinions.
Just worry about the facts 77...Portsmouth is a #2 seed and Fairland was a #1 seed. No if's, and's, or but's about it.
Prove me wrong with facts, please do it. lololololololol
Here's the Athens Sectional.
Fairland #1, (12-6)
Meigs #2, (9-10)
Southeastern #3, (9-9)
Wellston #4 (10-8)
River Valley #5 (8-10)
Albany Alexander #6 (7-10)
Nelsonville York #7 (5_13)
Belpre #8 (6-12)
Zane Trace #9 (4-15)
Federal Hocking #10 (5-14)
Crooksville #11 (5-14)
Here's the Jackson sectional.
Chesapeake #1 (16-1)
Portsmouth #2 (14-4)
Ironton #3 (12-6)
Wheelersburg #4 (14-5)
Lucasville Valley #5 (9-9)
Oak Hill #6 (13-5)
South Point #7 (10-9)
Minford #8 (7-12)
Rock Hill #9 (7-11)
Portsmouth West #10 (4-14)
Coal Grove #11 (2-15)
Fact is, Fairland was the #1 seed in the Athens sectional solely because other than Wellston at 10-8 they were the only team with a winning record. And I really can't believe that Wellston was given the #4 under two teams with losing records.
Now let's look at the Jackson sectional. No way Fairland gets a top 4 seed over the ones listed above so that puts them no better that a #5 and even though Fairland beat Oak Hill I would have to put the Oaks above them in the seeding so that moves them to #6.
So there are the FACTS and I stand behind my statement of Fairland being no better than a #5 or #6 seed at the Jackson sectional and maybe even a #7 since you have to factor Valley in there somehwere because they did beat Oak Hill rather handily both times they played.
I agree....Fairland played a tougher schedule, had far more talented players and had a better season than Portsmouth.TrojanBuff wrote:Thanks for your opinion...but Fairland was still the #1 seed and Portsmouth was the #2 seed...just the FACTS.
I never said any of that so how could you agree with me?4th n Goal wrote:I agree....Fairland played a tougher schedule, had far more talented players and had a better season than Portsmouth.TrojanBuff wrote:Thanks for your opinion...but Fairland was still the #1 seed and Portsmouth was the #2 seed...just the FACTS.![]()
![]()
TrojanBuff wrote:I never said any of that so how could you agree with me?4th n Goal wrote:I agree....Fairland played a tougher schedule, had far more talented players and had a better season than Portsmouth.TrojanBuff wrote:Thanks for your opinion...but Fairland was still the #1 seed and Portsmouth was the #2 seed...just the FACTS.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I have only been stating facts: Fairland was still the #1 seed and Portsmouth was the #2 seed.