You should not count any game as a win until the game is played! What happens to Clay in these rankings if they fall to the Tigers on Friday! Anything can happen?rockyraccoon wrote:Clay at 7 - 4 has a chance to end up with a 15 - 5 or 14 - 6 record having the toughest part of their schedule out of the way. They still have SV at home, Green and Eastern away but I think from what I saw in the first match ups, they should win at least 2 of 3 of these, if not all three. They have SW at home and that will be a real test for them, to see where they fair in the tournament. If they had played the earlier games with the style they have been playing lately, mixing up zone and man to man, instead of straight man to man that they played in the first 5 or 6 games, they could have won 2 or 3 more games, but that is water under the bridge. Just hope it doesn't drop them in seeding.
Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:17 pm
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
That is why I said "a chance". If they don't beat NB, Notre Dame, Western twice and East the whole point is moot.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
BlindWhiteHat wrote:If you check out St. Joe's schedule you'll see they didn't schedule any Christian schools. They played Rose Hill in the Coal Grove Christmas tournament. That is the only Christian school they should play this season. A few less than the 5 or 6 mentioned above.
Here is my sentence - "I also agree that though ISJ is 7-5, South Gallia has played the far harder schedule and always will now that they are a member of the TVC and not playing 5-6 Christian schools every year."
Obviously, if you read this sentence a little slower you will realize that I am talking about South Gallia's schedule the past few years.
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
Manchester nearly lost to North Adams, but they pulled out the W and that's what matters. I like how you;re ranking include the best wins....nicely done.
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
I'm also glad you took Fairfield's tough schedule, as well as the return of Chris Cox into account.
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
the return of Chris Cox is huge for Fairfield. They are no doubt the best 4-7 team in D-4
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
That Wellston Sectional is very solid and balanced. Besides Miller #9 that will be a hard sectional to seed. I dont think any of those teams can beat Eastern Meigs. But with #2-8 anything could happen.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
D4 Scores
Trimble 51 - how many teams do you know who could lose 2 starters and not struggle. Kind of feel sorry for them.
Waterford 31
Southern 43 - Look out for Southern the rest of the season. Hitting stride at right time.
Eastern Meigs 35
Symmes Valley 58
Notre Dame 40
Wheelersburg 59 - SW trailed most of the game but made it interesting falling to top 10 SE D3.
South Webster 57
New Boston 64 - NB is playing better but wasnt this game at Clay??? Good teams take care of weaker teams at home.
Clay 54
Fairfield ???
Peebles ??? - Could be a close game???
Trimble 51 - how many teams do you know who could lose 2 starters and not struggle. Kind of feel sorry for them.
Waterford 31
Southern 43 - Look out for Southern the rest of the season. Hitting stride at right time.
Eastern Meigs 35
Symmes Valley 58
Notre Dame 40
Wheelersburg 59 - SW trailed most of the game but made it interesting falling to top 10 SE D3.
South Webster 57
New Boston 64 - NB is playing better but wasnt this game at Clay??? Good teams take care of weaker teams at home.
Clay 54
Fairfield ???
Peebles ??? - Could be a close game???
-
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 6590
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
jimmy chipwood wrote:That Wellston Sectional is very solid and balanced. Besides Miller #9 that will be a hard sectional to seed. I dont think any of those teams can beat Eastern Meigs. But with #2-8 anything could happen.
I read on another thread that Racine Southern beat Eastern Meigs.
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
Eastern is still 11-2. Shots werent falling and Southern played well. Eastern will win the rematch
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
ironman,
i believe
1 manchester
2 south webster
3 green
4 fairfield
5 whiteoak
6 clay
i believe
1 manchester
2 south webster
3 green
4 fairfield
5 whiteoak
6 clay
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
sparky....it's that scenario every year....as you may have heard
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
After looking over the remaining schedules I see the following records for the Feb. 13th Draw.
Fairfield 8-10
Whiteaok 6-12 or 7-11 (depending on the NA game at home)
Clay 11-8 or 12-7
Green 12-5 (not sure when the makeup game with East takes place) that game would make them possibly 13-5
Notre Dame 7-12 (maybe 8-11 but not sure they can beat NB on road)
South Webster 11-6 (not sure of a couple makeup games that if played would make this more like 13-6).
Here is my questions for Sparky and Ironman?
It looks like it will be Manchester, South Webster, and than #3 Green. After that could/would they really have the #1 has to play the winner of #8/9 right? Dont you think they put Whiteoak at #8 so they have to play Manchester to advance to District!
Second question, has there ever been a year where Manchester, Fairfield, Whiteoak has had the chance to make it to District without having to play one another and if so what were the results? I dont remember this ever happening but maybe you remember such a scenario?
Fairfield 8-10
Whiteaok 6-12 or 7-11 (depending on the NA game at home)
Clay 11-8 or 12-7
Green 12-5 (not sure when the makeup game with East takes place) that game would make them possibly 13-5
Notre Dame 7-12 (maybe 8-11 but not sure they can beat NB on road)
South Webster 11-6 (not sure of a couple makeup games that if played would make this more like 13-6).
Here is my questions for Sparky and Ironman?
It looks like it will be Manchester, South Webster, and than #3 Green. After that could/would they really have the #1 has to play the winner of #8/9 right? Dont you think they put Whiteoak at #8 so they have to play Manchester to advance to District!
Second question, has there ever been a year where Manchester, Fairfield, Whiteoak has had the chance to make it to District without having to play one another and if so what were the results? I dont remember this ever happening but maybe you remember such a scenario?
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
I can remember Whiteoak advancing on without playing Fairfield or Manchester.....but during those years Fairfield and Manchester weren't very good.
They will either place Whiteoak #8 somehow or find Whiteoak and Fairfield somehow matched up at 4/5 or 3/6.....it'll happen.
I'm going with #3/#6
They will either place Whiteoak #8 somehow or find Whiteoak and Fairfield somehow matched up at 4/5 or 3/6.....it'll happen.
I'm going with #3/#6
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
Not sure what I was thinking - there is no way they could put Whiteoak at #8 with NB, East, and Western in the sectional.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 11:26 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
Will post the new rankings early this evening. Still have some decisions to make about teams such as Clay, Southern, Waterford, Fairfield, and Whiteoak. Green and Symmes Valley keep taking care of business and will probably be rewarded even though they are beating weaker teams.
If you have any supporting statements or information to add - now is the time.
If you have any supporting statements or information to add - now is the time.
- TribeManiac10
- SEOP
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:11 am
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
Not sure if you have seen the other topics yet but here goes...
From Yesterday:
Peebles 84
Manchester 60
At Ohio St. on Sunday:
Peebles 73
Leesburg Fairfield 60
From Yesterday:
Peebles 84
Manchester 60
At Ohio St. on Sunday:
Peebles 73
Leesburg Fairfield 60
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 4:17 pm
Re: Southeast District D4 Rankings 1-19-2011
In defense of Clay's loss to New Boston, NB is a much better team than their records shows, losing several close games. Last nights match against at Green, losing by a half court "buzzer beater???" shows us that the win over Clay wasn't a fluke. Eastern will have their hands full this Friday with NB in the cracker box gym.jimmy chipwood wrote:Will post the new rankings early this evening. Still have some decisions to make about teams such as Clay, Southern, Waterford, Fairfield, and Whiteoak. Green and Symmes Valley keep taking care of business and will probably be rewarded even though they are beating weaker teams.
If you have any supporting statements or information to add - now is the time.