TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:40 pm
there is a Ohio division topic so I thought I would start a Hocking.
Open for thoughts and opinions.
Open for thoughts and opinions.
SoutheasternOhioPreps.com
Southeastern Ohio Sports Message Board
http://190750.6hnlo.group/
TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Page 1 of 1
Re: TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:53 am
Southern!!!!
Re: TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:47 am
My quick and most likely to change picks
1. Eastern
2. Fed Hock
3. Southern
4. Waterford
5. Trimble
6. Miller
It should be real competitive 1-4.
Most to prove-Waterford
Most to lose-Fed Hock
Biggest Surprise-Eastern (if it is a surprise)
Biggest Disapointment-Waterford
POY-Lynch, Eastern
Coach of year-Howie
Most Technicals-Cunnigham, Waterford
Most Fake Baked Cheerleaders-Trimble
1. Eastern
2. Fed Hock
3. Southern
4. Waterford
5. Trimble
6. Miller
It should be real competitive 1-4.
Most to prove-Waterford
Most to lose-Fed Hock
Biggest Surprise-Eastern (if it is a surprise)
Biggest Disapointment-Waterford
POY-Lynch, Eastern
Coach of year-Howie
Most Technicals-Cunnigham, Waterford
Most Fake Baked Cheerleaders-Trimble
Re: TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:38 pm
Randomguy_ I will agree with you that the TVC Hocking should be a tight race. I don't see Eastern winning it, 8-14 last year. Plus they lost their key big man. I know their freshman class has some talent, but varsity is a little different than JV. Waterford has most of their players back from last year, should be one of the teams picked in the running. Fed Hock is always in the running, so you have to put them there. Southern could be coming off a 13 win season. They lost a couple key players, plus they need to learn how to beat winning teams.They beat Eastern twice, played Fed Hock and Waterford tough the last time they played them. So I put Southern in the mix too. Trimble improved as the year went on, they could upset some teams. Miller loses their best player.
Re: TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:13 pm
Eastern could win it or finish 4th. I think the loss in the District semis will weigh hard on the boys, once you taste the Convo that is all you want to eat. One thing I think we can agree on is an improvement from 8-14.
Waterford lost alot!!! They had 6 seniors including 3 starters, PG, SF, PF. They really have only 2 returning contributors. They could compete and win the Hocking, but I see more of a 3-4 place finish.
Fed Hock Always contends.
Southern showed some good things the end of last year, should build on.
Trimble is about half way through the bottom of a slump. Will win some, but not really be a threat. If they could get some upsets early and 20 home games they may have a chance.
Miller is doomed.
Waterford lost alot!!! They had 6 seniors including 3 starters, PG, SF, PF. They really have only 2 returning contributors. They could compete and win the Hocking, but I see more of a 3-4 place finish.
Fed Hock Always contends.
Southern showed some good things the end of last year, should build on.
Trimble is about half way through the bottom of a slump. Will win some, but not really be a threat. If they could get some upsets early and 20 home games they may have a chance.
Miller is doomed.
Re: TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:31 pm
Most Fake Baked Cheerleaders-Trimble
Re: TVC Hocking 2008-09 Predictions
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:39 pm
i think this is years title is up for the taking! Miller is prb the weakist in the league but who wants to go there and play for a title... just ask fed hock. Federal hocking is in the same position as last year, they lost there two or three key players and no one expects alot out of them.. but i think if some of them put in the time over the summer they could make a run. eastern is a little innconsistant but they have alot of talent, the same with southern, and waterford has a guy that will tower over everyone, and should controll everygame hes in(that is if he can keep his head)