Page 1 of 2

South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:26 am
by Galliaguy
Who is headed to the Convo??

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:31 am
by bbjunky81
Should be South Gallia in a landslide.

This side of the TVC was very bad.

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:32 am
by SuthurnFan
South Gallia. Although Southern (whom I'd like to see win) is improving, the cold streaks they have shooting will be their downfall. Hope SG goes far.

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 12:38 pm
by 1906
you just never know pulling for the rebels

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:39 pm
by OldBlue
When is this game and where?

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 3:02 pm
by Galliaguy
Next Weds at 6:30 @ Meigs HS

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:38 pm
by PTownhoops
Go Rebels and coach Howell !!!!!!!!!!!

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 3:46 pm
by tomcat fan
bbjunky81 wrote:Should be South Gallia in a landslide.

This side of the TVC was very bad.
Are you referring to the Hocking as being bad? If so you haven't watched much. It's been pretty competitive. Sure there are a couple teams on the down, but what conference doesn't have those?

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:59 pm
by bbjunky81
tomcat fan wrote:
bbjunky81 wrote:Should be South Gallia in a landslide.

This side of the TVC was very bad.
Are you referring to the Hocking as being bad? If so you haven't watched much. It's been pretty competitive. Sure there are a couple teams on the down, but what conference doesn't have those?
I've watched several TVC teams on that side, and yes I stand by my statement.

Eastern Meigs is down.
Southern is down.
Fed Hock is down.
Wahama is down.
Miller isn't great.
Belpre is OK
Waterford is good but young and not great
South Gallia is good but not great (they graduated Greer)
Trimble is good but after Jenkins/Guthrey they're not great, but they're solid and Howie obviously does a tremendous job with them.

So yes, the league is way down.

Compare it to the SOC 1 or SOC 2, where both have 5-6 very solid teams apiece (out of 8).

The other side of the TVC is very good (VC, Meigs, Alexander, Wellston etc).

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 11:16 pm
by tomcat fan
bbjunky81 wrote:
tomcat fan wrote:
bbjunky81 wrote:Should be South Gallia in a landslide.

This side of the TVC was very bad.
Are you referring to the Hocking as being bad? If so you haven't watched much. It's been pretty competitive. Sure there are a couple teams on the down, but what conference doesn't have those?
I've watched several TVC teams on that side, and yes I stand by my statement.

Eastern Meigs is down.
Southern is down.
Fed Hock is down.
Wahama is down.
Miller isn't great.
Belpre is OK
Waterford is good but young and not great
South Gallia is good but not great (they graduated Greer)
Trimble is good but after Jenkins/Guthrey they're not great, but they're solid and Howie obviously does a tremendous job with them.

So yes, the league is way down.

Compare it to the SOC 1 or SOC 2, where both have 5-6 very solid teams apiece (out of 8).

The other side of the TVC is very good (VC, Meigs, Alexander, Wellston etc).
Trimble, Waterford, and SG would hold there own against those 4 from the Ohio. Isn't Minford in the SOC? Trimble beat them by like 20

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 12:06 am
by bbjunky81
tomcat fan wrote:
bbjunky81 wrote:
tomcat fan wrote: Are you referring to the Hocking as being bad? If so you haven't watched much. It's been pretty competitive. Sure there are a couple teams on the down, but what conference doesn't have those?
I've watched several TVC teams on that side, and yes I stand by my statement.

Eastern Meigs is down.
Southern is down.
Fed Hock is down.
Wahama is down.
Miller isn't great.
Belpre is OK
Waterford is good but young and not great
South Gallia is good but not great (they graduated Greer)
Trimble is good but after Jenkins/Guthrey they're not great, but they're solid and Howie obviously does a tremendous job with them.

So yes, the league is way down.

Compare it to the SOC 1 or SOC 2, where both have 5-6 very solid teams apiece (out of 8).

The other side of the TVC is very good (VC, Meigs, Alexander, Wellston etc).
Trimble, Waterford, and SG would hold there own against those 4 from the Ohio. Isn't Minford in the SOC? Trimble beat them by like 20

Valley also beat Trimble, and Minford beat Valley twice.

South Webster, Clay, Wheelersburg, Waverly, Notre Dame all beat South Point. South Point then beat South Gallia by 15+.

Teams are determined by more than just one game.

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 8:35 pm
by TVC
Rematch of a year ago.
Shs lost Wolfe
SGhs lost Greer

Southern got the upset last year.
I look for a different result this time.
SG 57
SHS 39

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 11:59 pm
by RebelZone
I'll take SG 68-50

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 11:11 am
by 1906
lets hope so

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 11:59 am
by Rebels on 3
bbjunky81 wrote:
tomcat fan wrote:
bbjunky81 wrote:Should be South Gallia in a landslide.

This side of the TVC was very bad.
Are you referring to the Hocking as being bad? If so you haven't watched much. It's been pretty competitive. Sure there are a couple teams on the down, but what conference doesn't have those?
I've watched several TVC teams on that side, and yes I stand by my statement.

Eastern Meigs is down.
Southern is down.
Fed Hock is down.
Wahama is down.
Miller isn't great.
Belpre is OK
Waterford is good but young and not great
South Gallia is good but not great (they graduated Greer)
Trimble is good but after Jenkins/Guthrey they're not great, but they're solid and Howie obviously does a tremendous job with them.

So yes, the league is way down.

Compare it to the SOC 1 or SOC 2, where both have 5-6 very solid teams apiece (out of 8).

The other side of the TVC is very good (VC, Meigs, Alexander, Wellston etc).

SG might have lost Greer but they have Hutchinson brothers, Ehman and Drenner. I think they'll be fine.

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2016 1:46 pm
by RebelZone
Drenner has stepped his game up big time in the second half of the season. He alters aloe of shots down low.

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 7:47 pm
by 1906
ttt

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:54 pm
by Galliaguy
About time for game time!!!

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:29 pm
by Galliaguy
SG 12- southern 9. 1st qu

Re: South Gallia vs Southern

Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:45 pm
by Galliaguy
SG 25 Southern 28. Southern must be shooting 75 percent