Page 1 of 2
Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:12 pm
by Bleachrbum
Thoughts ??
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:48 pm
by chosenone
Symmes valley no doubt
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:03 pm
by jl724
Vikings by a lot.
Tibbs will kill them.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:38 pm
by gametime
ROCKHILL WINS IN OT
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:12 pm
by #1_fan
jl724 wrote:Vikings by a lot.
Tibbs will kill them.
lol, Hill should've won this one by 20. Let them back in the game late. Way to close the game out in OT though. Still need alot of growing. Onward to a very nice Oak Hill team.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:33 pm
by jottings
Final score?
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:57 am
by gametime
52 RH TO 48 SV IN OT
NICE WIN FOR THE REDMEN BIG SAM NICE GAME,WILDS GOOD SCOREING GAME.
DARB SHOT MORE NEEDS TO KEEP IT UP,SLOW DOWN ON TURNOVERS AND WELL BE ALRIGHT
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:02 am
by Clark Griswold
what is symmes valley's record now? this games result shocks me.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:06 am
by wemufans
I too was surprised. I thought the Vikings would win this easily. It just goes to show you that the Vikings are great for their division but move them up to a bigger division even with a subpar team then they will struggle.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:40 am
by beaverlover
wemufans wrote:I too was surprised. I thought the Vikings would win this easily. It just goes to show you that the Vikings are great for their division but move them up to a bigger division even with a subpar team then they will struggle.
Symmes Valley has only played 1 game in league,so how can you judge them as far as in there division?
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:59 am
by wemufans
I wasn't talking about teams in their league division but teams in their sectional.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:02 am
by Bleachrbum
I thought Notre Dame and Western were in Symmes Valley's league but your point is still basically the same.....guess only time will tell
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:04 am
by claypantherfan
Bleachrbum wrote:I thought Notre Dame and Western were in Symmes Valley's league but your point is still basically the same.....guess only time will tell
They are in symmes valley leagues that is the soc 1
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:09 pm
by VIKING GRAD
I was proud of the Viking Boys in the way they came back not once but twice last night to give the Redmen a good game.
Johnson, you played a really good game last night. Hustle which was nice to see. Bowling came in and really helped out to. This boy has matured alot over last year. Rest of the team also did a great job of hanging together for those comebacks, Payne, Tibbs, Craft. Taylor, Stanley and Ferris all made very good contributions to the game.
Proud of you guys. You play very well together.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:19 pm
by #1_fan
"subpar team"... ouch. lol
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:24 pm
by osumufan
#1_fan wrote:"subpar team"... ouch. lol
You lost to RIVER VALLEY. I would call that sub par too. Sorry!
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:50 pm
by PopCorn
Well this sub par team you talk about came very close to knocking off your OVC team! If they would have enforced the three second rule instead of letting Cook camp out under the bucket. (Don't get me wrong, he played a very good game) we would have ended alot different.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:20 pm
by wemufans
PopCorn wrote:Well this sub par team you talk about came very close to knocking off your OVC team! If they would have enforced the three second rule instead of letting Cook camp out under the bucket. (Don't get me wrong, he played a very good game) we would have ended alot different.
I was calling Rock Hill sub par in the OVC not the Vikings
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:16 pm
by #1_fan
osumufan wrote:#1_fan wrote:"subpar team"... ouch. lol
You lost to RIVER VALLEY. I would call that sub par too. Sorry!
yes, as only a subpar, actually below subpar team would do. I agree. But Rock Hill had just came off of a thrashing against Chesapeake, who just dismantled them. And their big time play-maker in Blagg, barely being able to keep his eyes open from a virus. But no excuse for that loss, whatsoever. You would think Cooke alone could beat RV...but it didn't end up that way. But I would say that this team is a completely different team on their home floor. Anyone who has watched the games would know this. The energy level is amazingly higher.--But I'm getting off track. Yes, RH lost to RV. That is SUBPAR, you are correct.
Re: Rock Hill v Symmes Valley 12/22
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:38 pm
by rhfootball14
Hey, I am a rock hill jv player and we won both games and that is that... nobody is gonna remember anything else about it next year other than Rock Hill 52 symmes valley 48...and thats how it is