Page 1 of 2
SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:46 am
by soc2fan
Put your picks for your starting five an put five players on the bench for both the soc1 an soc2 for an all star game type thing out of all the grades not just seniors. thought this could be interesting. consider the positions
this might be hard to put both soc 1 an 2 because people are not familiar with both. i am more familiar with soc2
SOC 2
Ondera-Oak Hill
Martin-Waverly
Yates-Valley
Stegman-Wheelersburg
Leslie-Northwest
Bench
Loop-Webster
Bendolph-Burg
Slone-Oak Hill
Utley-Valley
Kretzer-Waverly
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:37 am
by val13
SOC 2 Starters
1.Kyle Ondera (Oak Hill)
2.Blake Yates (Valley)
3.Jake Kretzer (Waverly)
4.Harrison Martin (Waverly)
5.Hank Leslie (Northwest)
Bench
1.Andrew Bendolph (Wheelersburg)
2.Zach Utley (Valley)
3.Jesse Slone (Oak Hill)
4.the Scott kid (South Webster)
5.Andy Stegman (Wheelersburg)
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:37 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
SOC2
W Loop - SW
Ondera - OH
Kretzer - Waverly
Stegeman - Burg
J Slone - OH
Bench -
C Scott - SW
Roeback Waverly
Yates - Valley
Utley - Valley
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:03 pm
by soccerfix
Swanker Pine wrote:SOC2
W Loop - SW
Ondera - OH
Kretzer - Waverly
Stegeman - Burg
J Slone - OH
Bench -
C Scott - SW
Roeback Waverly
Yates - Valley
Utley - Valley
Hey Swanker, I thought you met Mr. Martin Friday night. 19 points and sat out the entire 2nd qtr. You must ber looking at Stegman stats from last year. You also forgot Hank Leslie.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:05 pm
by jacksonoaks
I don't see Norm letting any players play in this game
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 7:43 pm
by soccerfix
[quote="jacksonoaks"]I don't see Norm letting any players play in this game[/quotedon't ht
I don't think he could get it scheduled in.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:03 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
Make your own list, Roeback and Kretzer are the better players from what i saw. I would take Stegman over Hank Leslie ANY DAY of the week. No Oaks will be in this game anyway so whats it matter
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:16 am
by bash
hey swanker.....no leslie....ur a joke,he is the best player in the league.....but what i read on here all the time your always on everything about webster.thats good that you support your own but get real on your so called OPINIONS.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:17 am
by soc2fan
leslie is a very good player suprised to see him not no your list but your starting five looks pretty good to me. with yates and utley on the bench your set. i might take one of those two over slone but thats just me
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 3:30 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
bash wrote:hey swanker.....no leslie....ur a joke,he is the best player in the league.....but what i read on here all the time your always on everything about webster.thats good that you support your own but get real on your so called OPINIONS.
Hey Bash, cry me a river son. Leslie will make it on the SOC2 team, no doubt, this is just my list, don't like it? I don't care if you do or not. Best player in the league? Kyle Ondera takes that cake.
And yes I am. its my school, they are my friends, I've only watched the other SOC2 schools as many times as Webster plays them. Its only natural for me to comment on the Jeeps more than any body else right
Ive got 3 big guys on my team, how many do I need?
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:19 pm
by jacksonoaks
soccerfix wrote:jacksonoaks wrote:I don't see Norm letting any players play in this game[/quotedon't ht
I don't think he could get it scheduled in.
Hey call it what you want, but He isnt the National Coach of the Year for nothing, I call it very smart thinking.
Why would you risk a number one seed.
ANd by far best player in the SOC would Be Kyle Ondera
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:31 pm
by Tigers24
bash wrote:hey swanker.....no leslie....ur a joke,he is the best player in the league.....but what i read on here all the time your always on everything about webster.thats good that you support your own but get real on your so called OPINIONS.
Hank Leslie is probably the 7th or 8th best player in the league IMO. Maybe 9th or 10th
Ondero
Martin
Kretzer
Slone
Scott
Bendolph
Roback
Johnston
Yates
Utley
Leslie???
Stegman
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:13 pm
by bash
i agree with the best players but just saying stegman hands down better than leslie and now the comment on he is the seventh or eighth best....yeah right.(IMO).leslie makes northwest.the other players are great players and i wasn't taking anything away from them.IMO waverly has 3 players as good as you can get,valley has 2 awesome players with players around them,oak hill is well oak hill and yes ondera is awesome,wheelersburg has stegman but his game without the surroudings has dropped(but still a great player),northwest in the past 4 years hasn't had but leslie and 4 others what i've seen and he does a great job for what the defenses does to him.I was just saying to swanker that all he usually BRAGGS on is s.webster.I know he's from there and thats great to support but to say leslie isn't better than stegman?Oh yeah and for s.webster i do feel they have a great team and w.loop and scott are on the list i'd even almost throw in a.loop.i'm not knocking those players mentioned but just someones opinion that i thought was wrong.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:29 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
bash wrote:i agree with the best players but just saying stegman hands down better than leslie and now the comment on he is the seventh or eighth best....yeah right.(IMO).leslie makes northwest.the other players are great players and i wasn't taking anything away from them.IMO waverly has 3 players as good as you can get,valley has 2 awesome players with players around them,oak hill is well oak hill and yes ondera is awesome,wheelersburg has stegman but his game without the surroudings has dropped(but still a great player),northwest in the past 4 years hasn't had but leslie and 4 others what i've seen and he does a great job for what the defenses does to him.I was just saying to swanker that all he usually BRAGGS on is s.webster.I know he's from there and thats great to support but to say leslie isn't better than stegman?Oh yeah and for s.webster i do feel they have a great team and w.loop and scott are on the list i'd even almost throw in a.loop.i'm not knocking those players mentioned but just someones opinion that i thought was wrong.
Stegmans game has dropped, but he's still putting up big numbers. Leslie has quality players around him, but if Stegman had a BURG team, no disrespect, he takes Leslie any day in my book. Lets face it, SOC2 is stacked with great players and you can't fit all of them on a 10 seat bench.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:12 am
by all-time athlete
Tigers24 wrote:bash wrote:hey swanker.....no leslie....ur a joke,he is the best player in the league.....but what i read on here all the time your always on everything about webster.thats good that you support your own but get real on your so called OPINIONS.
Hank Leslie is probably the 7th or 8th best player in the league IMO. Maybe 9th or 10th
.............. I don't even know what to say to something like that!
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:58 am
by soccerfix
Trust me Tiger24, if you have seen Hank played as many times as I have, you would put him in the top 5. He had a terrible game against Waverly up here but he could be a loose cannon Friday night. The kid can play.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:46 am
by eaglegrad
1st Team
Ondera (OH)
Yates (Valley)
Kretzer (WA)
Martin (WA)
Leslie (NW)
2nd Team
Loop (SW)
Bendolph (WB)
Scott (SW)
Utley (V)
Stegman (WB)
Slone (OH)
In no particular order.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:53 pm
by Bandwagoner
SOC II
1st Team;
F:Leslie-NW
F:Martin-Waverly
F:Stegman-WB
G:Kretzer-Waverly
G:Ondera-OH
2nd team;
Scott-SW
W. Loop-SW
Utely-Valley
Blake Yates-Valley
Johnston-Waverly
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:18 pm
by Pressbreaker
So nobody other than Swanker would put any of Webster's guys in the top 5-7 in the SOC? I think it says a lot about Webster's program to have a great chance of finishing 2nd in the league despite not having anyone even considered here. Webster's players deserve a lot of credit for buying in to Coach Ater's system and overachieving. I know this Webster fan would have taken a .500 year before the season started.
Re: SOC I vs. SOC II
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:49 pm
by Ironman92
Lord that would be an atrocious game.
90-50 or 55-24 if Norm is coaching.
Ondera is not only the best player in the SOC...he may be the best player in the entire SE district. He's going to be 1st team allstate this year.