Page 1 of 2

2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:49 pm
by John Wooden
Any updates?

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:36 pm
by George Jones
Evidently no one went to this game?

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:45 pm
by Kerinon
Symmes Valley by 1

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:49 pm
by enigmaax
51-50

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:52 pm
by WIFAN-22
Time left?

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:04 pm
by jottings
Final score?

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:07 pm
by WIFAN-22
Good job SV. Good luck!

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:12 pm
by jottings
I take it Symmes Valley won by one?

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:30 pm
by s.v.vikinglinex2
Yes Symmes Valley won 51 to 50.

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:08 pm
by a_c_m
Congrats Vikings!

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:22 pm
by motox21
I am a Waterford fan, and I will admit that did not play all that great, but they should have won, or at least went to OT. That was some of the worst officiating I've ever seen in that fourth quarter tonight, with 3.4 left they call a foul on austin shriver but it was def on SV. Then in the final second shriver was fouled, pretty obvious one to, shooting a three and no foul called. The officials must have known it was a bad call because within 3 seconds they were gone. I don't know what it is about the refs this year, but don't seem to like Waterford.

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:26 pm
by Super trooper
Wow

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:07 am
by THE GOVENOR
GOOD JOB VIKINGS !!!!!!

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:13 am
by Jesco White
motox21 wrote: The officials must have known it was a bad call because within 3 seconds they were gone. I don't know what it is about the refs this year, but don't seem to like Waterford.
I wasn't at the game, and I don't have a dog in the fight, so I won't defend the officiating. But, I will say that I've never been to a game where the officials didn't exit the floor immediately. I believe that is what they are supposed to do. I don't know that for a fact, but I'm sure some of the officials who frequent the site could give better insight.

As far as the game goes, congrats to the Vikings. It's always great as an SOC fan when one of our schools advances in the tourney!

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:16 am
by Kerinon
motox21 wrote:I am a Waterford fan, and I will admit that did not play all that great, but they should have won, or at least went to OT. That was some of the worst officiating I've ever seen in that fourth quarter tonight, with 3.4 left they call a foul on austin shriver but it was def on SV. Then in the final second shriver was fouled, pretty obvious one to, shooting a three and no foul called. The officials must have known it was a bad call because within 3 seconds they were gone. I don't know what it is about the refs this year, but don't seem to like Waterford.
I too am a Waterford fan and was @ the game, and as Moto says, our team didn't play a great game and the calls made didn't loose us the game, but those last seconds calls were ones that could have opened the door. That said, I've never seen a ref call a foul on that last second shot. Ever. Maybe it's just the games I'm at, but the refs seem ready to get the game over with those last seconds.

Both games last evening were exciting. Best of luck to Symmes Valley and South Gallia. Never saw St. Joe play until last evening and they were certainly digging deep and playing good ball. #22 seems to be a great player for them.

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:36 am
by SOCFAN1430
s.v.vikinglinex2 wrote:Yes Symmes Valley won 51 to 50.

Way to represent the SOC, Congrats the boys from SV and the coaching staff

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:05 am
by motox21
Jesco White wrote:
motox21 wrote: The officials must have known it was a bad call because within 3 seconds they were gone. I don't know what it is about the refs this year, but don't seem to like Waterford.
I wasn't at the game, and I don't have a dog in the fight, so I won't defend the officiating. But, I will say that I've never been to a game where the officials didn't exit the floor immediately. I believe that is what they are supposed to do. I don't know that for a fact, but I'm sure some of the officials who frequent the site could give better insight.

As far as the game goes, congrats to the Vikings. It's always great as an SOC fan when one of our schools advances in the tourney!
Trust me I'm at a lot of games to and have noticed that refs get of the court pretty quick, but I mean it was just odd how fast these ones were off the court.

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:10 am
by coop
kerinon wrote:
motox21 wrote:I am a Waterford fan, and I will admit that did not play all that great, but they should have won, or at least went to OT. That was some of the worst officiating I've ever seen in that fourth quarter tonight, with 3.4 left they call a foul on austin shriver but it was def on SV. Then in the final second shriver was fouled, pretty obvious one to, shooting a three and no foul called. The officials must have known it was a bad call because within 3 seconds they were gone. I don't know what it is about the refs this year, but don't seem to like Waterford.
I too am a Waterford fan and was @ the game, and as Moto says, our team didn't play a great game and the calls made didn't loose us the game, but those last seconds calls were ones that could have opened the door. That said, I've never seen a ref call a foul on that last second shot. Ever. Maybe it's just the games I'm at, but the refs seem ready to get the game over with those last seconds.

Both games last evening were exciting. Best of luck to Symmes Valley and South Gallia. Never saw St. Joe play until last evening and they were certainly digging deep and playing good ball. #22 seems to be a great player for them.
IMO;

A foul is a foul...no matter if there is 8:00 left or 0.2 seconds...if a kid is fouled while shooting, it should be called...but often isnt. I dont know why... **I didnt have a dog in this fight either**

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:32 am
by CharlieHustle
Do you think this win can save Fuller's job?

Re: 2/28 (3) Waterford vs (6) Symmes Valley

Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:40 am
by SOCFAN1430
scarlet_gray wrote:Do you think this win can save Fuller's job?

It depends on how much a sectional championship makes up for a 7-13 record. For most a sectional championship is a pretty big deal, unless your Chesapeake or someone like that lol. I know I expected them to win at least 12 games and compete in the conference, alot of people picked them to win it.