Page 1 of 3

Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:51 am
by TitanPride
Notre Dame coming off a huge SOC I victory, while Minford coming off a close loss to Valley. This should be another great cross conference matchup. Thoughts/Predictions?

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 9:01 am
by ManitouDan
have not seen minford play , could be a perfect letdown game for ND coming off the huge road coference win and Minford certainly not happy after being upset by valley. Lot of 3's will be flying . whover hits the most wins .

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:33 am
by Ol_BoyMF
Minford by 20...to much talent. being out coaced wont matter in this one

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:44 am
by D4hero
Ol_BoyMF wrote:Minford by 20...to much talent. being out coaced wont matter in this one


ahhh yes, there's that Minford arrogance coming back out for all to see.. It definitely worked out last week when you lost to Valley.. at home....

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:54 am
by juanmorales
Lucky for Munferd this game is at home bc if it was at ND id guarantee an ND victory. But since this one is at home i'll take ND by 2

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:38 am
by js7_22
Ol_BoyMF wrote:Minford by 20...to much talent. being out coaced wont matter in this one
Too much talent? Hardly. SOC 1 or not, ND has the talent that enables them to compete with any team around here, including Minford.

I'll take ND by 4 points. The key is shutting down McBee, and I believe ND can do so, you make the other 4 players who seem non existent in past games shoot and force bad shots. This should be a great game.

SOC 2 vs SOC 1

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:10 am
by ManitouDan
there isnt anyone local going to "shut down" Mcbee . You hope he doesnt go plum nuts and put up 35 and your other 4 outplay their other 4 . And that can happen . Minford is the obvious favorite, it would be an upset if ND can pull it off . ( lou holtz would be proud LOL)

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:58 am
by Crab's Brother
JS7_22 wrote:
Ol_BoyMF wrote:Minford by 20...to much talent. being out coaced wont matter in this one
Too much talent? Hardly. SOC 1 or not, ND has the talent that enables them to compete with any team around here, including Minford.

I'll take ND by 4 points. The key is shutting down McBee, and I believe ND can do so, you make the other 4 players who seem non existent in past games shoot and force bad shots. This should be a great game.

SOC 2 vs SOC 1
I wouldn't say non existent by any stretch. Against Valley the other night, Stapleton and McCray both had double figures and I believe Gullion has a 10 3 pointer game on his young resume.

McBee is very good, but Minford has more than him. I look for Shoe to try and go deeper than 7 in this one, as his kids were gassed on Friday as Valley ran 10 kids at the Falcons. This will show how good ND really is.

Minford 71
ND 59

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:36 am
by ManitouDan
big believer in ND I guess ?? LOL everyone is intended to an opinion. wish ND were catching them at a better time other than coming off a home loss on homecoming night. NOT making any excuses just pointing out the obvious . ND will have to shoot well from 3 to hang in there .

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:32 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
Minford by 21. McBee goes for 50. I'm calling it!

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:36 pm
by ManitouDan
^^ still butt hurt over how ND handled webster !

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:27 pm
by Lightle04
I got Minford by 3 . If you really think Minford is 20 points better than Notre Dame you should be barred from all basketball games. This will come down to foul shots.

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:48 pm
by CharlieHustle
Can't wait for this game!

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 1:48 pm
by CharlieHustle
ManitouDan wrote:^^ still butt hurt over how ND handled webster !
This deserves "Post of the Week" Award.

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:55 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
The prophecy will be fulfilled tomorrow night and Spanker Whine will be there to witness it

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:25 pm
by WIFAN-22
Not bold enough to say Minford by 20 but I certainly wouldnt be surprised. Im going with Minford by 12. Some predictors are trying to protect their own teams rep by their comments. Just saying.....

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:32 pm
by Lightle04
And some have seen both teams play about 5-7 times over the past 3 months . Just saying.

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 9:03 pm
by Eaglesnest
Minford has better players and should win. But, that doesn't mean that they will. Either Minford wins by 20 or Notre Dame will by 2.

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 10:13 pm
by Karma2
I have not seen Minford play but it's obvious they are a very talented team....no final score prediction here. The only thing that I will predict is that Notre Dame will play hard to the final buzzer and Coach Mader and his staff will have them fully prepared to play.....if Minford only went 7 deep and got gassed against Valley they had better get a good nights sleep.

Re: Game 4: Notre Dame (3-0) @ Minford (1-1) 12/11/12

Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:10 pm
by The Ghost of Swanker
ManitouDan wrote:^^ still butt hurt over how ND handled webster !
Still living in the past ?