Page 1 of 1

New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:23 pm
by 4thgoal
http://ohsaa.org/members/hsenroll13.htm

Does anyone else think some of these numbers look really high?
Minford 282, up from 186?
Coal Grove 205, up from 136?

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:00 pm
by TribeManiac10
What are the divisional cutoffs? Peebles is at 130 boys this year(same as South Webster) so they may move to division 4.

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:55 pm
by ohbuckeye2
BOYS

I guess Southeastern Ohio had a population boom lol......

Logan Elm................ 269 to 478........... + 209
Chillicothe............... 339 to 548........... + 209
Miami Trace............. 302 to 442........... + 140
Minford................... 187 to 282........... + 95
Jackson.................. 295 to 388............ + 93
Unioto.................... 241 to 333............ + 92
Zane Trace.............. 191 to 283............ + 92
Chesapeake............. 187 to 270............ + 83
Adena.................... 155 to 232............ + 77
Lynchburg Clay......... 143 to 217............ + 74
Vinton County.......... 271 to 345............ + 74
Oak Hill................. 160 to 232............. + 72
Southeastern........... 149 to 220............. + 71
Huntington............. 153 to 223............. + 70
Coal Grove............. 136 to 205............. + 69
Northwest.............. 187 to 253............. + 66
Ironton................. 174 to 238.............. + 64
Rock Hill............... 170 to 232.............. + 62
South Point............ 192 to 243.............. + 51
Circleville.............. 279 to 329.............. + 50
Gallia Acad............ 258 to 307.............. + 49
Portsmouth West..... 162 to 217.............. + 49
Paint Valley........... 132 to 176.............. + 44
Logan................... 478 to 515.............. + 37
Hillsboro............... 302 to 335............... + 33
River Valley........... 190 to 221............... + 31
Lucasville Valley..... 126 to 155............... + 29
South Gallia........... 91 to 120................ + 29
Wheelersburg......... 155 to 183............... + 28
Symmes Valley........ 96 to 121................ + 25
Western................ 92 to 115................ + 23
South Webster....... 108 to 130................ + 22
Portsmouth........... 179 to 199................ + 20
Leesburg Fairfield... 100 to 119................ + 19
Fort Frye.............. 128 to 147................ + 19
Alexander............. 171 to 193................ + 18
Port Notre Dame..... 37 to 35................... + 18
Piketon................ 179 to 197................ + 18
Wellston............... 188 to 206................ + 18
Green................... 64 to 81.................. + 17
Trimble................ 107 to 123................ + 16
West Union............ 145 to 161................ + 16
Marietta............... 367 to 381................ + 14
Sheridan............... 299 to 311................ + 12
Southern............... 76 to 86.................. + 10
Waterford.............. 89 to 98.................. + 9
Portsmouth Clay...... 65 to 73.................. +8
Beaver Eastern....... 90 to 97................... +7
Waverly................ 235 to 241............... + 6
Federal Hocking...... 138 to 144............... + 6
Ironton ST Joseph.... 17 to 18.................. +1
McClain................ 258 to 257............... + 1

Athens................. 297 to 297
Meigs................... 209 to 209
Manchester............ 90 to 90

Fairland............... 235 to 234...... - 1
Nelsonville-York..... 151 to 150...... - 1
New Boston........... 53 to 51........ - 2
North Adams......... 143 to 138...... - 5
Reedsville Eastern... 87 to 79........ - 8
Peebles................ 142 to 130..... -12
Miller.................. 104 to 89...... - 15
Sciotoville............ 74 to 59........ - 15
Warren................ 356 to 306..... - 50


Archbishop Moeller..........706 to 697........... - 9
Bishop Watterson............294 to 277........... - 17
Columbus Desales............289 to 292........... + 3
Cardinal Mooney.............257 to 231........... - 26
Bishop Hartley................215 to 210.......... - 5
Youngstown Ursuline........159 to 158.......... - 1
Newark Catholic..............105 to 112.......... + 7
Africentric.....................101 to 105.......... +4
Steubenville...................263 to 250.......... - 13
ST Vincent ST Marys..........270 to 281.......... + 11
Maria Stein Marian Local....108 to 108

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:49 pm
by 4thgoal
TribeManiac10 wrote:What are the divisional cutoffs? Peebles is at 130 boys this year(same as South Webster) so they may move to division 4.
The divisional cutoffs haven't been announced, but it looks like both will be right on the D3/4 line. It was previously 122 and under.

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:59 am
by bman
I'd say some of these numbers are probably 9-12 instead of 9-11.

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:46 am
by pfloyd
... wow, Southern/Southeastern Ohio gets a "boom" in their enrollment numbers while the state of Ohio is working it's darnedest to cut school/student funding to ALL of the schools in Southern/Southeastern Ohio ! ... the "not enough votes to worry about in Southern/Southeastern Ohio" syndrome" ? ...



Image

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:48 am
by pfloyd
... I read on the OHSAA website that the divisional breakdowns would not be out until after their June meeting ...

Image

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:31 am
by noreply66
Must be counting some imaginary girl and boy friends

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:40 pm
by DadPaul08
There are obvious mistakes that have been made on this count by OHSAA. I have already spoken to one school administrator who said the boys and girls count he is seeing, is MORE that the entire 9-12 enrollment at their high school. Remember, this count is supposed to represent grades 9-11, during the period of October 2012. Therefore, soneone goofed!!

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:52 pm
by bengalfan76
As an administrator one would home to have inflated numbers when state money is attached to individual kids. More kids more money

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:18 am
by popeyes
Just looking the #s over they must be counting 9 - 12 grades. Not right at all.

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 12:51 pm
by pfloyd
IF some of the numbers shown ARE grades 9-12 instead of 9-11 THIS "misinformation"(screw-up) put forth by the state shows the state education department's incompetence ... the numbers should be "perfect" as they are taken straight from EMIS - the system that the state department of education holds the schools to the fire for making sure that everything submitted to EMIS is exactly absolutely correct ... the state department of education who in their own mind does no wrong ... from unfunded mandates the state department of education puts on local school districts, to the DOE jumping through hoops for programs/tests that are created/backed by venders who are in line to make billions of dollars ... don't get me started on the state DOE, a Superintendent of Education who SHOULD BE putting all of his support toward PUBLIC schools BUT is in line/on record for his support of privately run "charter" schools ... UUGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!!


Image

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:28 pm
by EasternDspy
anyone have a guess how the numbers will break into divisions

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:34 pm
by pleasanttiger
no way ST JOE gained 1. they cant count exchange students that even in the country yet! :-D

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:17 pm
by 4thgoal
My guess would be the following, based on the numbers as they stand right now. This is based on putting approximately 200 schools per division.

D1 405+
D2 240-404 (Minford and Chesapeake would move up)
D3 132-239 (Ironton close to the line of being D2 with 238)
D4 <131 (Peebles and South Webster right on the line with 130 each)

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:07 pm
by hawkeyepierce
I call BS! Somebody had to goof this up. Vinton County is losing students.

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:19 pm
by bengalfan76
Hear Piketon numbers spot on so who knows

Re: New Numbers from OHSAA

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:39 pm
by wrestlefan1
The numbers will change a bunch once they adjust them. They release crazy early numbers ever few years. People go crazy. Then they adjust them. Why they do it I don't know