SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

If I'm not mistaken, this is the next game for both teams, correct? On Thursday night and at Oak Hill. What are your thoughts and predictions?

Lady Oaks!

Lady Oaks...not a game without Cook...

You never know, the Jeeps could pull it off with good defense

But it is true, they aren't the same without Cook

Thats why u play the game on the Floor not on Paper! An just something to think about how many teams have kept Valley's Mains to single digits an Northwests main threat Scareberry to only 3 points? Just something to think about!

The problem with that statement is that Valley and Northwest only have 1 maybe 2 scoring threats. Oak Hill has oh, EIGHT!
Any of there top girls could score double digits on any given night. It is just too hard to key in on one girl like you can do against Northwest and Valley

That wasnt to mean that they will concentrate on one player that was an example of just how they've been playing without Kayla be on the floor. Dont get me wrong Myself an everyone else is chopping at the bit to see her back on the floor, but until then it will make the team ALOT DEEPER for the 2nd half of the SEASON & the TOURNAMENT!

Hopefully she comes back stronger than ever because she will carry the team.

SENDEM wrote:Thats why u play the game on the Floor not on Paper! An just something to think about how many teams have kept Valley's Mains to single digits an Northwests main threat Scareberry to only 3 points? Just something to think about!

so you are saying that mains and scarberry are better than anyone the oaks have?
im sorry but if you really think that northwest or valley compare to oak hill then you are in for a rude awakening
oak hill 85 south webster 30

seohiofan wrote:oak hill 85 south webster 30

I don't think the score will be quite that bad, but I hope.

Some of u people on here take just about everything so personal an so far out of contexted that its not even FUNNY. So let me simplify it for u! IT WAS JUST AN EXAMPLE OF HOW GOOD THE GIRLS ARE PLAYING DEFENCE. AN IT WASNT SAYING THAT WEBSTER WOULD BEAT OAK HILL AN IT WASNT MEANT TO COMPARE ANY OTHER PLAYERS TO EACH OTHER. An before the season started NO BODY including myself NEVER thought that VALLEY would beat MINFORD, but they did. Thats why u play each game. Good Luck to BOTH teams!!

I don't say much on here but 30 SW maybe, OH 85 I don't think so.
45-30 OH with out COOK!

Just got the word in that the game has been postponed due to weather.

Thanks for the update. Was just gett'n ready to head that way.

South Jeepster wrote:I don't say much on here but 30 SW maybe, OH 85 I don't think so.
45-30 OH with out COOK!

without cook oak hill 85 south webster 30
with cook oak hill 85 south webster 40

OK the ten point spread for Cook is that on D or O! LOL

just making a prediction we'll see how close i am when the games are played

The game is resceduled for January 31. Cook would not have played Thursday but she is suppose to return for the Webster - Minford game on Monday! If I was the Oaks I would have rather gotten this out of the way Thursday. No way Oaks will score 80 points, not Thursday and definate not the next time they face off. To close to predict but the edge would have to go to the oaks! It should be a good one to watch!

i was being conserative
no way webster wins

ok then we will stay home