South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

User avatar
Red Ridding Hood
Riding the Bench
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 8:57 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Red Ridding Hood »

Good to see so many of the youth at the game last night. Hope they didn't see that display spoke about previously. Kyle Cayton really came back with a vengeance hat trick watch out, Goodard controlled the mid field, and the nets were much Fuller this game than last meeting. Kiel and Dever Fuller couldn't be stopped!!! Sowards shut out in the pipes!!! Also thought that Normand did a great job on defense!! Jeeps!!


Redcard
Freshman Team
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:18 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Redcard »

JuanMorales wrote:I guess we finally saw the real Valley last night. Didn't have that one woman from Valley reffing to bail them out! Big win for the Jeeps!!
I watched these teams play both times. I dont think there was a bailout in the first game as you have indicated. I think SW came out flat and valley, playing on turf, played very well. Second mtg- different story. SW played excellent as expected and dominated valley the whole game. SW is the obvious superior team here but lets not make the classic weak excuses thAt the only blemish for SW is due to a ref bailout. The webster soccer program does an excellent job of winning/ losing with class. I wish its online fans would do the same


Bigbadwolf
Freshman Team
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:03 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Bigbadwolf »

wow Redst.louiscardinals, you truly do have "foot in mouth syndrome". JM was obviously referencing the match between Minford and Valley. Game consisted of several terrible calls and got way out of hand. please do some homework, or in your case coloring, before you fire off your posts. To quote someone earlier, you are a "goon"!


juanmorales
JV Team
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by juanmorales »

Redcard wrote:
JuanMorales wrote:I guess we finally saw the real Valley last night. Didn't have that one woman from Valley reffing to bail them out! Big win for the Jeeps!!
I watched these teams play both times. I dont think there was a bailout in the first game as you have indicated. I think SW came out flat and valley, playing on turf, played very well. Second mtg- different story. SW played excellent as expected and dominated valley the whole game. SW is the obvious superior team here but lets not make the classic weak excuses thAt the only blemish for SW is due to a ref bailout. The webster soccer program does an excellent job of winning/ losing with class. I wish its online fans would do the same
Before you come at me get your facts straight. Badwolf is right I was referring to the Valley Minford game that I saw in person. I am a supporter of Southern Ohio soccer not just SW. So quit trying to be a know it all when everyone knows that you're not. Yes SW shows the most class of any team and I have a TON of respect for them. That's why I probably watch them more than any other team. So again, get your facts straight pal :aaaaa59 :aaaaa92


Redcard
Freshman Team
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:18 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Redcard »

bigbadwolf wrote:wow Redst.louiscardinals, you truly do have "foot in mouth syndrome". JM was obviously referencing the match between Minford and Valley. Game consisted of several terrible calls and got way out of hand. please do some homework, or in your case coloring, before you fire off your posts. To quote someone earlier, you are a "goon"!
Tweenwolf, you guys must play tennis cause that game would hardly be considered out of hand. Just hard SOC soccer if you ask me. Should there have been some yellows in that game? Probably. But not out Of hand. The PK call in that game was legit, and not called by the female ref. valley won that contest straight up with no bailout.


Jolly P(irate)
SEOP
Posts: 3187
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Jolly P(irate) »

HaaHaa. I now know why Redcard is hated. Take it easy on the guy, probably just a high school kid based on the posts I've seen.


juanmorales
JV Team
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by juanmorales »

bore off redcard. you're boring me.....
Last edited by juanmorales on Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Redcard
Freshman Team
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:18 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Redcard »

JuanMorales wrote:bore off redcard. your boring me.....
* you're


juanmorales
JV Team
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by juanmorales »

cool


GoCats
Riding the Bench
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:30 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by GoCats »

When I was in school there was a guy named Keegan on here that said a bunch of stupid stuff like that I think he got kicked off or something. I have long since graduated, he just sounds like he is in fifth grade when he would post. Maybe he is back with a different name??? :roll:


juanmorales
JV Team
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by juanmorales »

must be redcard!


Jeep79
Waterboy
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Jeep79 »

JuanMorales wrote:cool


Jeep79
Waterboy
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Jeep79 »

You guys really are not.


GoCats
Riding the Bench
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:30 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by GoCats »

I think red and soft yellow card need to calm down.
Last edited by GoCats on Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.


D4hero
Freshman Team
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:12 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by D4hero »

Wow guys woah I can't believe you guys are just realizing redcards is Keegan I thought everyone new that? I thought he was a burg fan now?


juanmorales
JV Team
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by juanmorales »

bigbadwolf wrote:wow Redst.louiscardinals, you truly do have "foot in mouth syndrome". JM was obviously referencing the match between Minford and Valley. Game consisted of several terrible calls and got way out of hand. please do some homework, or in your case coloring, before you fire off your posts. To quote someone earlier, you are a "goon"!
Redst.louiscardinals......hahaha how can you be a reds and a cardinals fan redcard

that's SIN!


juanmorales
JV Team
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by juanmorales »

D4hero wrote:Wow guys woah I can't believe you guys are just realizing redcards is Keegan I thought everyone new that? I thought he was a burg fan now?
Yea I remember a Keegan or Keagan or however its spelled. That guy was bonkers


Jolly P(irate)
SEOP
Posts: 3187
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by Jolly P(irate) »

I'm so confused. Keegan? the crazy guy with the Pirate hard hat from a few years ago? I'm lost.


User avatar
GaryGroundhawg
Riding the Bench
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:06 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by GaryGroundhawg »

I remember him to he was confused. A die hard Jeepsburgpirate fan. Very rare. He was always posting the same exact thing as other people already posted kind of weird.


jazzfingers888
JV Team
Posts: 386
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:23 pm

Re: South Webster vs. Valley 10/2/12

Post by jazzfingers888 »

so... redcard, swanker pine, soft-yellow card, and keagan are all one person??? wow, thats nice to know.


Post Reply

Return to “Soccer”