Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Tonight
3/28
Clay over New Boston
3/28
Clay over New Boston
Last edited by a_c_m on Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
The leesburg schedule you posted had their first game as Saturday the 26th. This saturday was the 24th. That was last years schedule. I also found that whiteoak played a doubleheader Saturday with Williamsburg and north central. I'm not sure that whiteoak schedule is right either.
Can anyone tell us for sure?
Can anyone tell us for sure?
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
The Fairfield schedule came from their school website and I copied and pasted it. The Whiteoak schedule would not let me copy it, so I had to type it out.l
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
The Whiteoak schedule is the 2012 schedule. The Fairfield schedule does not indicate 2011 or 2012, so I assumed it was the correct one. I am just trying to help you and if you want to doubt the information.......go ahead and do it yourself!
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Their schedule did include the 3/24 games with Williamsburg and North Central. I did not include that on the schedule since it was past and believed to be a scrimmage. So, that schedule is correct also.Crab's brother wrote:The leesburg schedule you posted had their first game as Saturday the 26th. This saturday was the 24th. That was last years schedule. I also found that whiteoak played a doubleheader Saturday with Williamsburg and north central. I'm not sure that whiteoak schedule is right either.
Can anyone tell us for sure?
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
My goodness buddy! You posted a schedule. I said it appeared to be the wrong one. No need to get all hostile. I also went to the Fairfield school site and seen the schedule. I thought it was wrong so I didn't post it. I didn't see the games that I had scores on for whiteoak so I asked a question. Chill out bub.a_c_m wrote:The Whiteoak schedule is the 2012 schedule. The Fairfield schedule does not indicate 2011 or 2012, so I assumed it was the correct one. I am just trying to help you and if you want to doubt the information.......go ahead and do it yourself!
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Wednesday Scores:
Valley 13
Northwest 0
Clay 10
New Boston 5
Green 15
East 0
ND @ SV was cancelled.
Anyone have a Western-Eastern Score?
Valley 13
Northwest 0
Clay 10
New Boston 5
Green 15
East 0
ND @ SV was cancelled.
Anyone have a Western-Eastern Score?
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Standings: (Missing Leesburg and East Schedules and Western-Eastern Brown score from Monday and Western-Eastern score from yesterday)
Fairfield 1-0 (?)
Valley 3-1
Clay 2-1
Whiteoak 1-3 (Beat West Union on Tuesday 6-0)
Notre Dame 0-1
New Boston 0-2
East 0-2 (?)
Eastern 0-2
Manchester 0-2
Western 0-2 (?)
Fairfield 1-0 (?)
Valley 3-1
Clay 2-1
Whiteoak 1-3 (Beat West Union on Tuesday 6-0)
Notre Dame 0-1
New Boston 0-2
East 0-2 (?)
Eastern 0-2
Manchester 0-2
Western 0-2 (?)
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Thursday's Games:
Raceland @ Clay
Symmes Valley @ Eastern
Manchester @ West Union
Notre Dame @ Northwest
Not sure on Fairfield or East.
New Boston, Western, Valley, and White Oak all show today as an open day.
Raceland @ Clay
Symmes Valley @ Eastern
Manchester @ West Union
Notre Dame @ Northwest
Not sure on Fairfield or East.
New Boston, Western, Valley, and White Oak all show today as an open day.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:30 am
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
ND's game against SV was rained out but we 10 run ruled northwest in the 6th
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Way to be a crybaby.....a_c_m wrote:Deleted/not appreciated!
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Update:
Looks like the unappreciated Whiteoak schedule was wrong as they did play yesterday:
Whiteoak 12
Peebles 0
St. Joes 15
East 5
Nothing on the other games.
Looks like the unappreciated Whiteoak schedule was wrong as they did play yesterday:
Whiteoak 12
Peebles 0
St. Joes 15
East 5
Nothing on the other games.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:32 am
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
whiteoak's schedule on their school website is correct
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
LGPSU.. Valley lost a game at Piketon saturday with Farmer on the mound, But he's probably the top recruit in 2013 so nothing to hang your head on that . Valley will win a bunch of games this season and hopefully go along way in the tourney ! Good luck to the TROJANS this year on the diamond !
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Crab's brother wrote:Way to be a crybaby.....a_c_m wrote:Deleted/not appreciated!
No crying here! I tried to help you and you did not appreciate the help, doubting the schedules that I had posted. The truth hurts doesn't it...........you did not appreciate what I tried to do. So, I deleted the info that I had posted and it is all yours. You said it was not correct.
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Thanks crazytrain! I appreciate your confirmations! Some people think they know it all!crazytrain wrote:whiteoak's schedule on their school website is correct
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
Not only that, they lost 1-0 on a balk call in the 8th.SOCMAN05 wrote:LGPSU.. Valley lost a game at Piketon saturday with Farmer on the mound, But he's probably the top recruit in 2013 so nothing to hang your head on that . Valley will win a bunch of games this season and hopefully go along way in the tourney ! Good luck to the TROJANS this year on the diamond !
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
a_c_m wrote:Crab's brother wrote:Way to be a crybaby.....a_c_m wrote:Deleted/not appreciated!
No crying here! I tried to help you and you did not appreciate the help, doubting the schedules that I had posted. The truth hurts doesn't it...........you did not appreciate what I tried to do. So, I deleted the info that I had posted and it is all yours. You said it was not correct.
"Deleted/not appreciated" is being a crybaby.....
The truth is that you posted the wrong schedule for Leesburg and because I didn't want to use the wrong schedule to go looking for scores, I asked if anyone had the correct schedule. Then you post a schedule that didn't show games that had been played and I asked for confirmation. I have a lot of things to do and tried to help track a sectional that get very little coverage. So, if you had any common sense you would see why I wouldn't want to use an incorrect schedule.
Just to recap:
1. I agree to track standings
2. I post all the 2012 schedules I can find.
3. You post 2011 Fairfield schedule
4. You say thanks for taking this on.
5. I say dates appear to be wrong on the Fairfield schedule say I'll check 103 website.
6. You post Whiteoak schedule that does not show games that I shown as already being played.
7. I say that Leesburg dates appear wrong and that Whiteoak appears to have games missing. Ask someone to confirm.
8. You tell me how you got the schedules and if I doubt you I can do it myself.
9. I again state why I wanted to check to make sure they are correct.
10. You go back and delete and put your little "deleted/not appreciated".
11. I call you a crybaby.
12. You say you are not a crybaby and the truth hurts. Yet you are the one and posted incorrect info.
Just a little recap of this thread......
Re: Division IV Southeast district updates/standings
you guys should get each others phone numbers and hash it out, Im sure I speak for most while saying, nobody else gets a rats butt, lets read some baseball threads !