soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 3:22 pm
how will they finish?
SoutheasternOhioPreps.com
Southeastern Ohio Sports Message Board
http://190750.6hnlo.group/
soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Page 1 of 1
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:51 pm
Baserunner................what do you think? I really do not know much about any team except New Boston. They should be competitive as they should have the same girls that were successful at volleyball and basketball.
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:36 pm
New Boston 
.
Soc- 1
1.Clay
2.East
3.Green
7.New Boston
Soc-2
1.West
2.Burg
3.Valley
. Soc- 1
1.Clay
2.East
3.Green
7.New Boston
Soc-2
1.West
2.Burg
3.Valley
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:57 am
1 Clay
2 Green
3-5 SV , ND and East battle it out.
SOC II
1 Burg
.....
.....
.......
the rest
MD
2 Green
3-5 SV , ND and East battle it out.
SOC II
1 Burg
.....
.....
.......
the rest
MD
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:04 pm
ManitouDan wrote:1 Clay
2 Green
3-5 SV , ND and East battle it out.
SOC II
1 Burg
.....
.....
.......
the rest
MD
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:49 pm
S.O.C 1
Clay / ND for the # 1 spot
Green will be in the mix of things
S.O.C 2
West / Burg for the # 1 spot great match up every year
Waverly- will be the sleeper team
Clay / ND for the # 1 spot
Green will be in the mix of things
S.O.C 2
West / Burg for the # 1 spot great match up every year
Waverly- will be the sleeper team
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:27 pm
COACH1 wrote:S.O.C 1
Clay / ND for the # 1 spot
Green will be in the mix of things
S.O.C 2
West / Burg for the # 1 spot great match up every year
Waverly- will be the sleeper team
That looks good to me...
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:50 pm
1. Clay
2. Green
3. Notre Dame
Soc 2
1. Burg
2. West
3. Waverly
2. Green
3. Notre Dame
Soc 2
1. Burg
2. West
3. Waverly
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:07 pm
Don't count out Minford as being a good contender this year!
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:32 pm
I am surprised to see so many people think so highly of East. Alot of you have them ahead of New Boston, Eastern and Western. From what I remeber East was beat easily by all 3 teams last year. Does East have some freshman that are pretty good?
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 1:31 pm
East should be much improved from last year, they will have pitching instead of relying on just 1 person to pitch every game along with a complete catcher that can block a ball along with should be able to throw people out. In a couple years East should be able to compete in every game.
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:55 pm
East is building a program. Every year you will hear more about them. Adam is a good coach and the team is getting better. I say in another year or so they will be on top of SOC-1. They will be very good this year.
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:14 pm
That is true, Adam has improved this team each year he has been at East....now they have a junior high program as a feeder system to the high school, next Sciotoville is going to have to get little league back and not be involved with NewVille to have a feeder system for the junior high program. Once that happens East will be in good shape.
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:14 pm
West and the BURG will fight to the end...and yes im going with the BURG 
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:44 pm
The Riepo Man wrote:West and the BURG will fight to the end...and yes im going with the BURG
You may be right but I think West wants to get even. Burg got the wins last year and I'm sure West is not happy. It's always a great game when these two meet.
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:47 am
It's really a toss up between those two teams.
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:59 pm
I give the nod to the Burg based on experience...it should be there's to lose
Re: soc 1 soc 2 rank them
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:55 pm
It's theres to win you mean...dont want to have the other teams think youve already won