But of course I am prejudice, just like the majority of people on sites such as this
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eb05/3eb05984ed1c87c0b93389aa696b194ff7538f43" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
WHSwarrior wrote:It's Ironton. There isn't any debate. 2 state titles, soon-to-be all time winningest coach. Awesome stability. Awesome tradition. Excellent players. Dreaded facilities.
I would remind everyone that Logan scrimmages Sheridan every year. It's always a good game, but i think most years Logan comes out on top. I think coach Amyx would tell you that you can't get a better scrimmage a week before Lancaster.
grizzlynatural wrote:So if you've had a state title in the past 100 years that automatically makes you eligable to be in the top programs list? I assumed when i first read the thread that it meant best programs in SEO RIGHT NOW, not since 1776. Wasnt Portsmouth good once or something? Nobody has mentioned them. Yeah, they havent been good for a long time, but neither has Ironton and they are at the top of the list for best program for most poeple. I wouldnt say a program is the best program because they have a state title from 25 years ago considering the only place where things are the same (except for the winning part) is at Ironton.
Just another way to give people a chance to give SOME kind of reason as to why they are better than Logan.
grizzlynatural wrote:So if you've had a state title in the past 100 years that automatically makes you eligable to be in the top programs list? I assumed when i first read the thread that it meant best programs in SEO RIGHT NOW, not since 1776. Wasnt Portsmouth good once or something? Nobody has mentioned them. Yeah, they havent been good for a long time, but neither has Ironton and they are at the top of the list for best program for most poeple. I wouldnt say a program is the best program because they have a state title from 25 years ago considering the only place where things are the same (except for the winning part) is at Ironton.
Just another way to give people a chance to give SOME kind of reason as to why they are better than Logan.
Philos_Finest wrote:I would remind everyone that Logan scrimmages Sheridan every year. It's always a good game, but i think most years Logan comes out on top. I think coach Amyx would tell you that you can't get a better scrimmage a week before Lancaster.
A Scrimmage is not a game and cannot be compared to game. Also, from what i have heard, Sheridan has won 3 of the last 4 scrimmages. Not that it really matters. I would love to see Logan in the MVL along with Zanesville.
tigercannon71 wrote:The no brainer #1 is Ironton. Then I think you got to look at teams like Wheelersburg, Nelsonville-York, Portsmouth. After that I think the fields wide open. When you talk of best programs its not in a 5 or 10 year span its over the span of many decades. Thats why Ironton is #1. Then you got these other teams these four teams get it done and have gotten it done for years.
dazed&confused wrote:Orange and Brown wrote:PURPLEPOWER wrote:Easy there Howie! There are some of us in the Logan community who would like to see some changes at LHS. The biggest one being getting into a more competitive league. Personally, I would like to see us in the MVL.
Logan vs. Sheridan
Logan vs. New Lex
These would be awesome MVL title games!
It would be more competitive for Logan but the MVL seems happy with the way things are now, so good luck gettin in.![]()
![]()
Will never happen. I'd like to see it from a purely selfish point of view (I live in MVL territory). But i really think Logan's future lies more to the northwest. They really need to get out of the SEOAL. They have simply outgrown it.