OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

know your role · Post by **know your role** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:21 pm

Ocho,
You are right my friend. Point well taken. I guess that is what you get by trying to show both sides of a story.

qualified101 · Post by **qualified101** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:50 pm

no, i dont know it all, just alot. are you kidding me about how much time a coach puts in over the summer? what? 10 days or so. if thats going out of their way, too bad.

ocho, whats your angle in this other than sour grapes? i mean i know kyr's motive/angle, but whats your deal with oak hill?

ohbuckeye2 · Post by **ohbuckeye2** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:02 am

oneoak wrote:During the regular season, Regina defeated the Division I runner up, Toledo Start; the Division II champ, Hathaway Brown and the Division IV champ, Africentric. Regina was the only undefeated girls team in the state.

Here's some of the other teams they beat during the regular season.

Euclid Regina.........55
Hathaway Brown.....43........D2 State Champions

Euclid Regina.........70
Col Africentric........27.......D4 State Champions

Euclid Regina.........51
Toledo Start..........47.........D1 State Runner up

Euclid Regina.........64
Canton McKinley......57.........D1 Final Four

Euclid Regina.........66
Twinsburg............64..........D1 District Champs

Euclid Regina.........73
Mentor................44..........D1 District Champs

Euclid Regina.........67
Pick Central...........53..........D1 District Champs

Euclid Regina.........71
Walsh Jesuit..........47..........D2 Regional Finals

Euclid Regina.........66
Mifflin.................40..........D2 District Champs

ocho stinko · Post by **ocho stinko** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:34 am

I have no problem with them other than you. If you have looked at my last several of posts I have complemented them and talked about some of the players I think will play a big role in their upcoming season. Not crazy about all of the tranfers. I am a loyalty guy. But, that is just a discussion thing. They do win. Not crazy about AAU coaches that are head coaches, but that is not against any state rule. NO beef with them. I wish all high schoolplayers the best of luck. Your posts seem so defensive like your guilty about something. At least that is they way it comes across to me. Not everyone has to agree with you or me. In my opinion Oak Hill will be back to state next year and the players I mentioned in this post or another I think will play the biggest roles for them to get their again. Just my opinion. Good prgrams sometimes get put under a microsope for whatever the reason good or bad.

lady_oaks_fan3362 · Post by **lady_oaks_fan3362** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:12 am

FudgeRound847 wrote:
lady_oaks_fan3362 wrote:
seohiofan wrote:im looking for a big game out of adkins
played very limited last night still big contributor with 6 assists
and a couple of big rebounds late
still havent figured out why she played so little

I am not the coach just a fan but Adkins had an off tournament and very uncharacteristic of her. She will shake it off and be back next year stronger than ever. Her 6 assists were countered by 6-8 turnovers so maybe that was part of the reason. She scored a total of 5 points in the state tournament but every good player has an off tourney from time to time.

Lady Oaks fan? hmm don't seem like it... has 2 off games and everyone complains... GET A GRIP!

I have a firm grip on reality thank you! I am a Lady Oaks fan but the facts are the facts. I have seen these girls play since grade school and they all have off tourneys and unfortuantely for Adkins this was one of hers. Just stating facts.

qualified101 · Post by **qualified101** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:11 pm

all ive done is give you facts. if thats makes somebody look guilty, then so be it.

Kenny Bixx · Post by **Kenny Bixx** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:13 pm

The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

qualified101 · Post by **qualified101** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:38 pm

congrats lady oaks!

jacksonoaks · Post by **jacksonoaks** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 am

They did? Did we have two southeastern ohio teams make it to State? i know the oaks made it, i didnt know VC also made it..

who did they play? did they win?

Kenny Bixx wrote:The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

Leaving Minford · Post by **Leaving Minford** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:27 am

Kenny Bixx wrote:The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

When did getting beat in the sectional semis become a good thing?

SENDEM · Post by **SENDEM** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:23 pm

jacksonoaks wrote:They did? Did we have two southeastern ohio teams make it to State? i know the oaks made it, i didnt know VC also made it..

who did they play? did they win?

Kenny Bixx wrote:The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

Now thats FUNNY!!! :lol:

I dont care who u are!!

Kenny Bixx · Post by **Kenny Bixx** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:32 am

SENDEM wrote:
jacksonoaks wrote:They did? Did we have two southeastern ohio teams make it to State? i know the oaks made it, i didnt know VC also made it..

who did they play? did they win?

Kenny Bixx wrote:The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

Now thats FUNNY!!! I dont care who u are!!

Let's see, Caudill 16, Puckett 15 and Strite 2, that is 33 of the 48 points scored. The facts are the facts, the VC girls did well. And now that is FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jacksonoaks · Post by **jacksonoaks** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:47 am

Geesh VC has ree girls with the last name of three girls from Oak Hill
what team did the three from VC play to score 33?
i know the Oaks played in the state championship.

Kenny Bixx wrote:The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

[/quote]

Now thats FUNNY!!! :lol:

I dont care who u are!![/quote]

Let's see, Caudill 16, Puckett 15 and Strite 2, that is 33 of the 48 points scored. The facts are the facts, the VC girls did well. And now that is FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/quote]

Slim Jim · Post by **Slim Jim** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:43 pm

Leaving Minford wrote:
Kenny Bixx wrote:The fact is........................the VC girls did well.

When did getting beat in the sectional semis become a good thing?

It's not a good thing...It's just what happens to schools that lose their key player(s) to other schools.And this has nothing to do with Oak Hill,meaning Oak Hill is'nt the only school in this area that has benefited from other schools players jumping ship.But as it turned out bad karma finally caught up with them as well.

seohiofan · Post by **seohiofan** » Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:33 pm

I have a firm grip on reality thank you! I am a Lady Oaks fan but the facts are the facts. I have seen these girls play since grade school and they all have off tourneys and unfortuantely for Adkins this was one of hers. Just stating facts.[/quote][/quote]
just seems to me its like we debated about in an earlier forum when comparing oak hill and south webster when u stated something like if you stop cook you stop webster and i stated the same could be said for oak hill if you stop adkins after watching the games again it seemed both teams at the state did their homework and decided not to let adkins beat them ! but i look for oak hill to be back better than ever next season i already dread playing them next year!!

Kenny Bixx · Post by **Kenny Bixx** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:30 pm

Who is to say that if the VC girls were at VC, that VC is not playing for a state championship?

Congratulations to the Jackson Oaks. You have joined the ranks of the South Webster Fighting Tigers, the Chillicothe Falcons, and Alexander Iron Bulldogs.

Slim Jim · Post by **Slim Jim** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:06 am

Kenny Bixx wrote:Who is to say that if the VC girls were at VC, that VC is not playing for a state championship?

Congratulations to the Jackson Oaks. You have joined the ranks of the South Webster Fighting Tigers, the Chillicothe Falcons, and Alexander Iron Bulldogs.

Falcons? Who went to Chilly from Minford?

SENDEM · Post by **SENDEM** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:39 am

Kenny I believe that I can speek pretty much for everyone on this thread SHUT UP its done an over with an u are not going to change anything. Congrats to the Oak Lady Oaks

The Wizard · Post by **The Wizard** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:50 pm

I guess Jeffers either got better players than Hale or he did a better job with the transfers. He won the state and Hale was just runner-up.

CINCY OAK FAN · Post by **CINCY OAK FAN** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:11 pm

The Wizard wrote:I guess Jeffers either got better players than Hale or he did a better job with the transfers. He won the state and Hale was just runner-up.

What are you The Wizard of??????????? STUPIDITY??????? Sounds like you earned it with comments like that.

Every crowd has a joykill and we have ours here. Shame on you!

SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA

Re: OAK HILL VS SOUTH EUCLID REGINA