SOC 2 awards

Tigerfan31 · Post by **Tigerfan31** » Mon May 11, 2009 1:01 pm

Does anybody know when these are announced? Just curious as to who will win player of the year and who is first team.

BULDOG · Post by **BULDOG** » Mon May 11, 2009 2:23 pm

Voting was saturday but probably not offically released for a couple weeks.

POY is usually a pitcher. So probably Robertson of Waverly.

roundingthird · Post by **roundingthird** » Mon May 11, 2009 8:06 pm

I'll throw some names out for POY.
Robertson has got to be the favorite.

Robertson Waverly
Teeters Waverly
White Burg
Hopper Burg
Bricker West

swbaseballfan · Post by **swbaseballfan** » Mon May 11, 2009 8:25 pm

its gotta be robertson...great hitter...and twice the pitcher

Catch24 · Post by **Catch24** » Wed May 13, 2009 8:34 am

You could make a great case for White and Hopper of Wheelersburg. Both of these guys can change a game w/ one swing and other teams know this. Both have started and hit in the middle of the lineup since they were sophomores on some outstanding Wheelersburg teams. Since that sophomore year, I believe the Burg to date has a record of 74-7. Throw in their freshman year and it bumbs their H.S. record up to 100-13. That's coming off of memory, but I know they are very responsible for many of those wins. Both have had great H.S. careers and both have bright futures. I wish them the best.

roundingthird · Post by **roundingthird** » Fri May 15, 2009 3:39 pm

When will these awards become public?

BULDOG · Post by **BULDOG** » Fri May 15, 2009 8:35 pm

roundingthird wrote:When will these awards become public?

It seems like they usually wait until the tournament is well underway. Also the conference title still hasn't been decided with Waverly still to play W'Burg and finish the Valley game. This will determine the number of selections based upon how each team finishes.

1st place gets 5 (3 1st and 2 2nd)
2nd place gets 4 (2 and 2)
and so on.

IMO these remaining league games should've already been played. There have been a couple days that these game could've been played.

Tigerfan31 · Post by **Tigerfan31** » Fri May 15, 2009 9:05 pm

Buldog--I wish games were over with but there is no way that they could have been played at Waverly. We have had rain just about everyday it seems like.

BULDOG · Post by **BULDOG** » Sat May 16, 2009 8:23 am

Tigerfan31 wrote:Buldog--I wish games were over with but there is no way that they could have been played at Waverly. We have had rain just about everyday it seems like.

I understand but it could've been played at W'Burg.

soccerfix · Post by **soccerfix** » Sat May 16, 2009 8:43 am

Do you think Wheelersburg would give up a home game when they were two games out with two to play? Get real!!

free safety · Post by **free safety** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:45 am

Burg tried to play Waverly today, but I guess Robo couldn't pitch so they said NO.

Also the game that was called off last week because of rain some people made the trip up and said that the Tigers was practicing on the field. I guess Robo couldn't pitch that game either.

When is the game against Valley being made-up.

Tigerfan31 · Post by **Tigerfan31** » Sat May 16, 2009 12:55 pm

Free Safety--The reason why the game wasn't played today was because that would possibly make Waverly playing 5 games in 6 days. Thats a little much. It has nothing to do with Robo not pitching. We have other pitchers that can pitch and would have against Wheelersburg or any other team. We are making up the game with Valley on the 19th. Not sure if you know but this was started once before but was suspended due to rain. If we were playing today, it would be suspended right now due to rain because it is raining in Waverly at the current time.

Buldog--I am sure if the situation was switched then Burg would rather play their home game up Waverly. Yeah right..

Besides there is some talk about making up the Burg game on May 26th.

BULDOG · Post by **BULDOG** » Sat May 16, 2009 2:39 pm

Tigerfan31 wrote:Free Safety--The reason why the game wasn't played today was because that would possibly make Waverly playing 5 games in 6 days. Thats a little much. It has nothing to do with Robo not pitching. We have other pitchers that can pitch and would have against Wheelersburg or any other team. We are making up the game with Valley on the 19th. Not sure if you know but this was started once before but was suspended due to rain. If we were playing today, it would be suspended right now due to rain because it is raining in Waverly at the current time.

Buldog--I am sure if the situation was switched then Burg would rather play their home game up Waverly. Yeah right..

Besides there is some talk about making up the Burg game on May 26th.

Yes W'Burg would give up a home game to travel to Waverly twice to play the game... As a matter of fact we played both our Valley games at Valley this year. :122249

There is more hinging on playing these games than the SOC2. SOC2 awards, to be exact, will probably be delayed until the league games are complete

Tigerfan31 · Post by **Tigerfan31** » Sat May 16, 2009 3:26 pm

Right now Waverly is focused on the playoffs and I am sure it is the same with Burg. Waverly would just rather play home games on their own field with their fans there. Plus, they are undefeated in conference and do not see them giving up home field advantage. The game will get played soon enough, most likely around the 26th. If Waverly gets beat by Circleville, then it might happen sooner.

Bozo · Post by **Bozo** » Sat May 16, 2009 3:33 pm

SOC needs to go with the SVC make-up rule.
League games are made up the next Tuesday or Thursday. No if, and or buts.
Non-league games on Tuesday and Thursday are always in jeopardy.
Some SVC schools schedule non-league games for Tuesday and Thursday. Others just load up on Saturday DH's.

soccerfix · Post by **soccerfix** » Sat May 16, 2009 3:43 pm

Waverly had agreed to play Wheelersburg down there for a second time but Burg's AD would not allow a baseball game during a home track meet. Waverly won 15 games so far without Robo pitching. I've never heard the bottle of whine being opened up in Wheelersburg before.

smurray · Post by **smurray** » Sat May 16, 2009 7:03 pm

Seems everyone is jealous of winners, regardless of who they are.

hbk2016 · Post by **hbk2016** » Sat May 16, 2009 7:49 pm

If the tables were turned there is no way 'Burg would go for any of that. Don't even act like they would, we have all been around too long to bite on that nonsense!

swbaseballfan · Post by **swbaseballfan** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:16 pm

i'd just like to see some games get played. the rain is supposed to hold off all week and be nice out

BULDOG · Post by **BULDOG** » Sun May 17, 2009 8:08 am

hbk123 wrote:If the tables were turned there is no way 'Burg would go for any of that. Don't even act like they would, we have all been around too long to bite on that nonsense!

If the tide was turned this game would have already been played. By the way, read my post above.

My complaint has nothing to do with who pitches this game just that it needs to be played and over. I agree with Bozo should not have an option of pushing it 2-3 weeks after the scheduled season.

Anyway, hope it will be played soon so both teams can focus on the tournament.

SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

SOC 2 awards

SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards

Re: SOC 2 awards