SHL 09-10 Scores and Standings

[jchitwood]

Thanks, FHS!

You Can't post tables on here, so I did my best:

Team - W - L - SHL - STREAK - PCT.

ESB / 4-0 / 1-0 / W4 /1.000
PEB / 3-0 / 1-0 / W3 / 1.000
WHK / 3-2 / 2-1 / W2 / .600
MAN / 3-2 / 1-2 / L1 / .600
FRD / 2-2 / 2-0 / W2 / .500
RIP / 1-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .333
LYN / 1-2 / 1-0 / L2 / .333
FAY / 1-3 / 0-2 / L2 / .250
WU / 0-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .000
NA / 0- 4 / 0-1 / L4 / .000

And that's how spent my morning at work.

[BuckeyeFan2011]

thanks for the update

[dmills]

Thanks, FHS!

You Can't post tables on here, so I did my best:

Team - W - L - SHL - STREAK - PCT.

ESB / 4-0 / 1-0 / W4 /1.000
PEB / 3-0 / 1-0 / W3 / 1.000
WHK / 3-2 / 3-1 / W2 / .667
MAN / 3-2 / 1-2 / L1 / .667
FRD / 2-2 / 2-0 / W2 / .500
RIP / 1-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .333
LYN / 1-2 / 1-0 / L2 / .333
FAY / 1-3 / 0-2 / L2 / .250
WU / 0-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .000
NA / 0- 4 / 0-2 / L4 / .000

And that's how spent my morning at work.

I bet you make good money doing this to.

[jchitwood]

Actually, my boss just stuck his head in my door screaming at me, "Get those f-ing SHL standings done by noon or you're fired!"

What a slave driver.

[HoundsAre4Real]

Whiteaok-54
Manchester-52

[jchitwood]

wow, Greyhounds made one hell of a comeback.

[fhs_shl11]

jchitwood do u kno what the game was like? was it sloppy or just good defense?

[jchitwood]

I have no idea...Tribe Maniac said the Hounds were down 14 in the third; that's why I was surprised about the comeback. Your thoughts, Tribe?

[TribeManiac10]

I have no idea...Tribe Maniac said the Hounds were down 14 in the third; that's why I was surprised about the comeback. Your thoughts, Tribe?

I thought it was a little bit of both. During the quarters that I watched the Greyhounds were making some careless passes and Whiteoak just took advantage.

[kg23]

1st. what makes u think I'm not a player? haha. AND your are all so sadly mistaken, seaman and justice certainly were not the 2 guys that handed Fairfield that beat down. I seem to recall 3 other guys on the floor at any given time, Nate Stephens (who is the most unselfish, NON glory seeking, and under-rated player in the league) and two others who were our rebounder's and underneath scorers (one of which led the league in rebounds for more than half the year, only to be out-rebounded at the end of the year by a very good Jarred Quinlan I believe). So if you put that in perspective, all of those 2nd and 3rd shots last year were probably mostly because of them. Shooters can't shoot if rebounder's don't rebound, right? And lets remember, just because a player doesn't shoot 20-30 times in a game and average 25pts doesn't mean they aren't great players. TA and TC are what Peebles is lacking this year, Peebles will still find a way as along as Collier handles the glass. But definitely going to have to disagree that Seaman and Justice won that game. and one more thing. Justice is not better than Seaman. Not saying Seaman is better than Justice, just saying Justice IS NOT better than Seaman, thats all.

FHS (and everyone else from Leesburg) sorry for the comment. It was your coaches fault not yours. I shouldn't have said that, I'm sure it embarrassed you guys when your coach did that. My bad

[fhs_shl11]

I forgot about Tyler Arnold..
I will admit im wrong but i think we shuld settle this argument...wee both have our opinions about where Seaman could go but we will keep it to ourselves for now on? agreed?

[fhs_11]

Can one honestly say that Justice is not better than Seaman, scoring his 1000th point his sophomore year sets him apart from Seaman, who is set to score his 1000th point sometime this year. You can make the arguement that Seaman is a better leader and point guard. but if you consider being good as just being a scorer than Justice all the way, in every other aspect of the game, i would choose Seaman.

[sparky]

as long as seaman and justice aren't caught up on who is the best then peebles should be fine, however, if this becomes an issue between the two or the team then there could be problems. nothing hurts a team like jealously and a lot of times it is not the kids but the adults that cause the problems.

[jchitwood]

Both kids would rather score 2 points and win than 40 points and lose.

[imlovinit]

I agree with Sparky and jchitwood...and for pete's sake, quit discussing this already. Andrew and Blake have been friends for as long as they've been playing basketball, and all this debate that pairs them against each other isn't good for either one of them or the team. Yes, it's an opinion forum, but you have to remember that discussion on here can cause tension (unless of course that's your goal, and then shame on you). How about what the two have in common---immense talent, strong academics, supportive families, leadership qualities, great personalities, and a solid friendship. Those things will take them much further in life than who's a better shooter or rebounder on a given Friday night.

[shljunkie]

very well said lovin it

[luvit]

Good to see you back shljunkie.

We've missed you.

[jchitwood]

After Friday night's games, SHL Standings:

Team - W - L - SHL - STREAK - PCT.

ESB / 5-0 / 1-0 / W5 /1.000
PEB / 4-0 / 2-0 / W4 / 1.000
MAN / 3-2 / 1-2 / L1 / .600
WHK / 3-3 / 1-2 / L1 / .500
FRD / 2-2 / 2-0 / W2 / .500
LYN / 2-2 / 2-0 / W1 / .500
RIP / 1-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .333
FAY / 1-4 / 0-2 / L3 / .200
WU / 0-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .000
NA / 0- 5 / 0-2 / L5 / .000

[jchitwood]

What's the final on the Ripley/Fairfield game?

[jchitwood]

Team - W - L - SHL - STREAK - PCT.

ESB / 6-0 / 2-0 / W6 /1.000
PEB / 4-0 / 2-0 / W4 / 1.000
MAN / 3-2 / 1-2 / L1 / .600
RIP / 2-2 / 1-2 / W1 / .500
WHK / 3-3 / 1-2 / L1 / .500
FRD / 2-3 / 2-1 / L1 / .400
LYN / 2-3 / 2-0 / L1 / .400
WU / 1-2 / 0-2 / L2 / .333
FAY / 2-5 / 0-2 / L1 / .285
NA / 0- 5 / 0-2 / L5 / .000