Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

User avatar
4 HORSEMEN
JV Team
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:32 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 4 HORSEMEN »

.... But to echo what some on here have already said, I remember a few years ago, DeSales went 5-5 and made it all the way to the State Championship.

Obviously scheduling "up" and playing better competition put them in a situation to play for the title. If you schedule bigger schools who are very successful, you can make the playoffs with just 5 wins.....

And if you have a good program who has played the best teams in the state during the season, the playoffs can seem a whole lot easier to navigate. ;-)


I smell good
JV Team
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:55 am

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by I smell good »

Didn't Minford make an appearance in the final four in 85?


mr.dude2010
Freshman Team
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:06 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by mr.dude2010 »

scheduling better opponents is not the cure all, but it does have an impact. forcing your players to go through adversity, to have to fight hard to get a win, to have to fight through all 4 quarters on a high motor with high intensity, is what helps teams be successful in the post season. some people act that way anyway, but for the ones that dont the pressure of playing a team much better than themselves and trying to find a way to pull of a win is important


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4139
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by loganlocos »

I smell bad wrote:Many don't want to hear this, or read it, but I say it and I will write it anyway cause I strongly believe in it. Some have touched on this with their posts. But to be more specific, simply scheduling better teams is not the cure all to being successful in the playoffs. Some teams can schedule up and beat some of the better teams without making any other changes. But most don't simply schedule better teams, beat those teams, and then start winning playoff games. Most have to do some retrospection, and make the decision to improve their program. You have to do the things the better programs do to have a chance to be successful against them. Unfortunately, many coaches are not willing to do that. They either think they are already doing things the best way, or they don't want to put the time in that it takes to make a change. In the latter case, many times neither do the players. Then they blame any number of people or things for the reasons why they can't win playoff games. But they never take a look in the mirror. So to the teams that continually make the playoffs and lose by larger margins, I say you need to take a look at what you are doing and not just at your schedule. You can either continue to claim you have horrible luck in the playoff draw, blame other people and other things for your losses, or you can do some self analysis and try to improve.


Amen.

I've seen it happen in Logan over the last ten years.

The 2000 team that went to a regional final and this years team could have won playoff games based on talent.

But last years Logan team, the 2007 team that nearly beat Tr-Valley, and the '06 team that made the playoffs were made better by schedule upgrades made in 2002 and 2003 (and beyond).

It has changed the entire level of our program. Our kids are learning to play at a higher level as freshmen and sophomores and it's continuing on to the Varsity team.

Logan used to have GREAT kids who would not be challenged but maybe once or twice a year. In turn, they "under-achieved." Now we have GREAT kids who play GREAT and FORCED to play great or get beat. Our kids and coaches are better for playing a better schedule.


LoganElm_grad09
Varsity
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by LoganElm_grad09 »

IRONFALCON wrote:I might be off here but I have another thought. A lot of guys that play at bigger schools also only play one sport. Take track for example, to northern kids it's a big deal and they spend all year working for one sport. The competition is such at bigger schools that a lot of guys can only play one sport unless very gifted, of course there are exceptions to this. But in our area most guys play at least 2 and often times three sometimes four sports every year. It is nearly impossible for kids to play that many sports and put the work into the weight room like they need to do to compete at the end of the season. We have teams that go great for 6-7 weeks but then hit a wall because their off-season preparation is not as good as it needed to be. When a group of 40 guys dedicate themselves to one sport and prepare all year round for 4 years for it of course they are going to be head and shoulders above other teams.


I'll have to disagree with this to a point. I agree with the enbolded point, but I believe that if you play other sports it makes you a better athlete than you would be from just lifting. For some it works, others it doesn't.

Take a lineman who is 250 lbs and put him in the weightroom and pit him against another 250 lb lineman who plays football but also wrestles and does track (likely shot/disc lol). I will bet anything that the first kid is a brute, but the second kid is a better overall athlete than the first. Every lineman that did other sports I knew said that wrestling made you a much stronger lineman than you'd be without it.


LoganElm_grad09
Varsity
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:42 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by LoganElm_grad09 »

Also, scheduling is huge. Amanda Clearcreek (the team that beat Alexander) plays against three D2 schools, a handful of D3 schools, and some D4 schools. Not to forget Newark Catholic, a very strong team also.


User avatar
1987chieftains
SEOPS H
Posts: 7660
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 1987chieftains »

LoganLocos wrote:
I smell bad wrote:Many don't want to hear this, or read it, but I say it and I will write it anyway cause I strongly believe in it. Some have touched on this with their posts. But to be more specific, simply scheduling better teams is not the cure all to being successful in the playoffs. Some teams can schedule up and beat some of the better teams without making any other changes. But most don't simply schedule better teams, beat those teams, and then start winning playoff games. Most have to do some retrospection, and make the decision to improve their program. You have to do the things the better programs do to have a chance to be successful against them. Unfortunately, many coaches are not willing to do that. They either think they are already doing things the best way, or they don't want to put the time in that it takes to make a change. In the latter case, many times neither do the players. Then they blame any number of people or things for the reasons why they can't win playoff games. But they never take a look in the mirror. So to the teams that continually make the playoffs and lose by larger margins, I say you need to take a look at what you are doing and not just at your schedule. You can either continue to claim you have horrible luck in the playoff draw, blame other people and other things for your losses, or you can do some self analysis and try to improve.


Amen.

I've seen it happen in Logan over the last ten years.

The 2000 team that went to a regional final and this years team could have won playoff games based on talent.

But last years Logan team, the 2007 team that nearly beat Tr-Valley, and the '06 team that made the playoffs were made better by schedule upgrades made in 2002 and 2003 (and beyond).

It has changed the entire level of our program. Our kids are learning to play at a higher level as freshmen and sophomores and it's continuing on to the Varsity team.

Logan used to have GREAT kids who would not be challenged but maybe once or twice a year. In turn, they "under-achieved." Now we have GREAT kids who play GREAT and FORCED to play great or get beat. Our kids and coaches are better for playing a better schedule.


I WHOLE HEARTEDLY AGREE! YOU HAVE TO SCHEDULE TOUGHER NON-LEAGUES FOR YOU, YOUR COACHES AND YOUR PLAYERS TO SEE AND EXPERENCE FOR THEMSELFS. BUT, A HEAD COACH HAS TO ALSO LET HIS OFF/DEF-COORDINATORS TO MAKE CHANGES ALSO.


NY BUCKS
All State
Posts: 1439
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 6:29 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by NY BUCKS »

Alot of TEAMS IN SEO are Running teams...period.........stop the run and your beat.
AS a whole we need TEACH BASIC FOOTBALL....COVERAGES RUN DEFENCE KICKING GAME IS A BIG FACTOR.....Look at NY AT THE FINAL SCORES LOST BY 2 MONROE CENTERAL...ASHLAND CRESTVIEW LOST BY 2-3.....TIGHT GAMES.


User avatar
4 HORSEMEN
JV Team
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:32 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 4 HORSEMEN »

There was a time when you had to be a GREAT team to make the playoffs. Due to multiple expansions in the playoff system that is no longer true.

You can be an AVERAGE team in a weak league, and typically pick up enough points to get in the playoffs and flame out after round #1.........

However, if you make a serious run to the Regional Finals etc., then you probably have a LEGIT case of being considered VERY good or even GREAT.

Scheduling BETTER nonleague competition can do nothing but help you as you advance through the playoff rounds. If nothing else, it can help keep your kids from being completely STAR-STRUCK from other teams or other programs, because they have already faced similar situations in the regular season.


pappy1
Varsity
Posts: 638
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 4:07 am

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by pappy1 »

A team that can't make the playoffs, or makes the playoffs and gets blown out will not improve to state championship contenders overnight. They must learn to walk before they can run. Teams, coaches and fans should look for steps of improvement. Have a long term plan of upgrading the schedule, weight lifting, dedication etc. Follow the plan. Don't get discouraged if it doesn't happen all at once.


coop
SEOPS
Posts: 5558
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by coop »

In 05 Valley was pretty competitive in Reg 19. They defeated Grandview, and then took #1 Bishop Ready behind the woodshed before losing in the Regional title game to Centerburg 26-21.


User avatar
4 HORSEMEN
JV Team
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:32 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 4 HORSEMEN »

I think if you spend some time around different programs with different levels of playoff success, you will see a very different approach to the playoffs.

Some teams are just "tickled-pink" to be there! Other, more successful programs consider round one of the playoffs the beginning of the next journey, not the end-all-be-all of their season.

Last week I was at a playoff game between two teams.

Team "A" has a long history of playoff appearances and they completely EXPECTED to be there. Their team and fans treated it like any other game on their schedule because in their mind, they EXPECTED to be playing week 11.

Team "B" has not had much playoff success. They had t-shirts made up that said "2009 State Playoffs". It was obvious that both the fans and the team were just happy to be there. Their attitude and demeanor completely revealed that week 11 was the "crowning achievement" of their season.

Long story short, team A destroyed team B.

Team "A" just won last night too. This also was exactly what the fans expected (even though this years team is far from the best they have ever known). They truly believe their SEASON begins in the Regional Championship.

Scheduling up, being progressive in the development of your athletes and program, and changing your team expectations and attitudes can go a long way to helping your program be competitive in the playoffs.

Don't get me wrong, take the time to enjoy ever win and every trip to the playoffs, but expect and prepare for excellence......... Sometimes VERY GOOD things happen ;-)


User avatar
TIGERS90
Varsity
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:55 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by TIGERS90 »

4 HORSEMEN wrote:I think if you spend some time around different programs with different levels of playoff success, you will see a very different approach to the playoffs.

Some teams are just "tickled-pink" to be there! Other, more successful programs consider round one of the playoffs the beginning of the next journey, not the end-all-be-all of their season.

Last week I was at a playoff game between two teams.

Team "A" has a long history of playoff appearances and they completely EXPECTED to be there. Their team and fans treated it like any other game on their schedule because in their mind, they EXPECTED to be playing week 11.

Team "B" has not had much playoff success. They had t-shirts made up that said "2009 State Playoffs". It was obvious that both the fans and the team were just happy to be there. Their attitude and demeanor completely revealed that week 11 was the "crowning achievement" of their season.

Long story short, team A destroyed team B.

Team "A" just won last night too. This also was exactly what the fans expected (even though this years team is far from the best they have ever known). They truly believe their SEASON begins in the Regional Championship.

Scheduling up, being progressive in the development of your athletes and program, and changing your team expectations and attitudes can go a long way to helping your program be competitive in the playoffs.

Don't get me wrong, take the time to enjoy ever win and every trip to the playoffs, but expect and prepare for excellence......... Sometimes VERY GOOD things happen ;-)


I agree completely...I believe Logan should read this and quit living the dream that winning the League means everything...I saw on here earlier someone from Logan saying let's make it five in a row....I hope that isn't speaking for everyone there...I could care less if I won the league if I was 2 and out every year...Playoffs are where it's at...and if you don't play a tough enough schedule to win when you get there...it's not good enough...Logan had a very good team this year...but they weren't playoff ready for Div 2....Maybe for Div 4...But not Div 2...enough said...


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by Paladin »

I made the argument several years ago on here that you had to upgrade your schedule and play tougher people.Then, some people laughed and made all kinds of excuses why that couldn't happen. Those people have now changed their minds,lol. Your league has to do the same thing. The region gets no better as one team. The region gets better when all improve in competition. That is why I always raised the North as examples. It can happen here but won't if people still avoid doing the right thing. Play up or play tougher to get better.

Or continue to fail.


User avatar
4 HORSEMEN
JV Team
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:32 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 4 HORSEMEN »

Well said Paladin!!!

If teams don't schedule up and change the way they do certain things, don't be suprised if your playoff fortunes don't change. (I mean this as a general statement for ALL teams in the area).

The teams that do it, are typically better prepared and have more success than the teams that don't ;-) ;-) ;-)


FarAwayFalcon
Varsity
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:53 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by FarAwayFalcon »

It doesn't help when everytime your team wins their conference and makes the playoffs but loses in the first or second round everyone says it was a "great" year. In my book a great year is a regional championship or more. A conference championship and playoff appearance is a "good" year, not a "great" year.


wrestler87
Freshman Team
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:38 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by wrestler87 »

datchillicav wrote:SCHEDULE. That is why Ironton has been successful in the playoffs. It is why Logan has not been usually, but why I feel that they are beginning to be. They used to play in the SEOAL(doesn;t get you ready for D1 and 2 playoffs) AND schedule relatively weak non conference games often. Now, they are still in the SEOAL but they probably played the toughest non-conference schedule in SEO this year. It began to pay off last year and I think will pay off this year.

Most that have spoken so far have been mostly correct.


Who Logan plays didn't make the set of Seniors have the talent they possess. It did help them better prepare for the post season. Keep the odds of a State Championship in mind. 700 + Teams vie for 6 titles. LESS than a 1% chance, so as an Average for all schools combined- one in every 100+ years. :)
I just think the schools should schedule as strong as they can schedule for (depending on league strength) 2-3 football games. If they lose those, maybe they aren't really looking at a State Title anyways, and need to focus on League. If they DO win those tough games, League can be used to fine tune. Keeping participation up is most Key in our area IMO. Those who are doing the best seem to have the highest participation rates per total student body.
Also, scheduling begins young. Don't just throw a D-5 team who has been playing locally into the fire at the Varsity level against a D-1 talent team and expect them to suddenly have the tricks of the more tested teams mastered.
That's just my 2 cents.


User avatar
TIGERS90
Varsity
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:55 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by TIGERS90 »

Wrestler87 wrote:
datchillicav wrote:SCHEDULE. That is why Ironton has been successful in the playoffs. It is why Logan has not been usually, but why I feel that they are beginning to be. They used to play in the SEOAL(doesn;t get you ready for D1 and 2 playoffs) AND schedule relatively weak non conference games often. Now, they are still in the SEOAL but they probably played the toughest non-conference schedule in SEO this year. It began to pay off last year and I think will pay off this year.

Most that have spoken so far have been mostly correct.


Who Logan plays didn't make the set of Seniors have the talent they possess. It did help them better prepare for the post season. Keep the odds of a State Championship in mind. 700 + Teams vie for 6 titles. LESS than a 1% chance, so as an Average for all schools combined- one in every 100+ years. :)
I just think the schools should schedule as strong as they can schedule for (depending on league strength) 2-3 football games. If they lose those, maybe they aren't really looking at a State Title anyways, and need to focus on League. If they DO win those tough games, League can be used to fine tune. Keeping participation up is most Key in our area IMO. Those who are doing the best seem to have the highest participation rates per total student body.
Also, scheduling begins young. Don't just throw a D-5 team who has been playing locally into the fire at the Varsity level against a D-1 talent team and expect them to suddenly have the tricks of the more tested teams mastered.
That's just my 2 cents.


I agree that you don't just throw them into the fire...however...as the kids go through pee wee ball...I believe the best preparation is to coach then what they are going to be doing in high school...it get's them better each year..hopefully mastering it by the time they get in high school...but then to play a stronger schedule when they are in jr. high, then also as the frosh years begin...then as sophomores through seniors they are on the level to compete...The more you practice something the better you get at anything...the tougher the competition the more you can learn...the weaker the competition...you really aren't learning anything...look at Genoa area...that was just sad...they blew everyone out by over 40 this year and got beat in the second round...


91blue14
SE
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:37 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 91blue14 »

4 HORSEMEN wrote:I think if you spend some time around different programs with different levels of playoff success, you will see a very different approach to the playoffs.

Some teams are just "tickled-pink" to be there! Other, more successful programs consider round one of the playoffs the beginning of the next journey, not the end-all-be-all of their season.

Last week I was at a playoff game between two teams.

Team "A" has a long history of playoff appearances and they completely EXPECTED to be there. Their team and fans treated it like any other game on their schedule because in their mind, they EXPECTED to be playing week 11.

Team "B" has not had much playoff success. They had t-shirts made up that said "2009 State Playoffs". It was obvious that both the fans and the team were just happy to be there. Their attitude and demeanor completely revealed that week 11 was the "crowning achievement" of their season.

Long story short, team A destroyed team B.

Team "A" just won last night too. This also was exactly what the fans expected (even though this years team is far from the best they have ever known). They truly believe their SEASON begins in the Regional Championship.

Scheduling up, being progressive in the development of your athletes and program, and changing your team expectations and attitudes can go a long way to helping your program be competitive in the playoffs.

Don't get me wrong, take the time to enjoy ever win and every trip to the playoffs, but expect and prepare for excellence......... Sometimes VERY GOOD things happen ;-)


i couldnt agree more :mrgreen:


User avatar
4 HORSEMEN
JV Team
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:32 pm

Re: Being Competitive in Playoffs ?

Post by 4 HORSEMEN »

I am not talking about just throwing your kids to the Lions out or the blue, BUT changing the entire culture of your program over time.

I don't think this can be COMPLETELY done in one year. It is a situation where you add a game, expose your kids (and fans), and begin changing the way everyone sees and views your program. Most importantly you change the way those within your program see themselves.

If done correctly, eventually your team (and fans) aren't satisfied with just beating the same "D" Level program they have always beaten. Your level of achievement isn't JUST measured by winning LEAGUE titles and MAYBE making the playoffs and getting destroyed in the 1st round......

Instead, you gun for, compete, and beat quality teams from quality programs. You no longer see league titles and first round beat-downs as the end-all-be-all of accomplishment, but you begin to measure your program, tradition, and overall success with regional titles, state appearances, and eventually state championships.

I know not every team is ready for this step, you gotta walk before you run, but too many coaches are afraid to compete and would rather schedule small and guarantee that 8-2/9-1 season while beating NO ONE.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”