Texas 2 wrote:There is no way Logan will beat Jackson this year. Jackson will beat Logan by 14 or more.
C'mon kid, Jackson will be lucky to beat GAHS in Gallipolis this year.
Texas 2 wrote:There is no way Logan will beat Jackson this year. Jackson will beat Logan by 14 or more.
GalliaGrad78 wrote:Texas 2 wrote:There is no way Logan will beat Jackson this year. Jackson will beat Logan by 14 or more.
C'mon kid, Jackson will be lucky to beat GAHS in Gallipolis this year.
1987chieftains wrote:GalliaGrad78 wrote:Texas 2 wrote:There is no way Logan will beat Jackson this year. Jackson will beat Logan by 14 or more.
C'mon kid, Jackson will be lucky to beat GAHS in Gallipolis this year.
jackson doesn't beat LOGAN this year either. i would say it would be closer to LOGAN by 14. just b/c the outstanding class of 2010 wouldn't be on the field doesn't mean LOGAN is dead in the water.
Trojan_FB_Alum wrote:I hate having this same argument every year but can someone explain to me why the OHSAA has divisions if enrollment isn't a factor?
Kenton in the Ben Mauk years would not agree.Wrestler87 wrote:Also, the best teams play at the top levels.
How and when are divisions omited? Do you mean USAToday kind of polls?Wrestler87 wrote:The big picture omits divisions,
I don't think they reward teams, they just give them a fair playing field based on size.Wrestler87 wrote:whereas the State level rewards teams based on size
Wrestler87 wrote:You broke the parts down and lost the context of the statements. It is obviously over your head.
Sorry.
Wrestler87 wrote:You broke the parts down and lost the context of the statements. It is obviously over your head.
Sorry.
noreply66 wrote:Wrestler87 wrote:You broke the parts down and lost the context of the statements. It is obviously over your head.
Sorry.
This is an easy way to say "I do not know what I'm talking about"
More schools play basketball then football, yet they only have 4 divisions. There is more depth in basketball yet fewer divisions.Wrestler87 wrote:6 titles are due to depth