SOC I vs. SOC II

soccerfix
Varsity
Posts: 684
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:19 pm

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by soccerfix »

Pressbreaker wrote:So nobody other than Swanker would put any of Webster's guys in the top 5-7 in the SOC? I think it says a lot about Webster's program to have a great chance of finishing 2nd in the league despite not having anyone even considered here. Webster's players deserve a lot of credit for buying in to Coach Ater's system and overachiving. I know this Webster fan would have taken a .500 year before the season started.


Best possible scenario is tied for second. You're gonna get beat by Oak Hill and if Waverly gets beaten by Oak Hill without Martin. you tie for second. Ater does deserve COY.


Pressbreaker
Waterboy
Posts: 34
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:31 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by Pressbreaker »

That doesn't make any sense....
"best possible scenario" is Webster beating Oak Hill and finishing in second place outright after another Waverly loss to Oak Hill. If you mean probable, then you got it right...
I think either team could beat Oak Hill with a little luck. The Oaks play a slow-tempo, low-scoring style which could give Webster or Waverly the chance to hang around.


User avatar
The_Legend_of_Northwest
All State
Posts: 1185
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:17 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by The_Legend_of_Northwest »

Tigers24 wrote:
bash wrote:hey swanker.....no leslie....ur a joke,he is the best player in the league.....but what i read on here all the time your always on everything about webster.thats good that you support your own but get real on your so called OPINIONS.


Hank Leslie is probably the 7th or 8th best player in the league IMO. Maybe 9th or 10th



Thanks Tigers24 for giving me the best laugh I have had in a long while.


User avatar
The_Legend_of_Northwest
All State
Posts: 1185
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:17 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by The_Legend_of_Northwest »

My team SOC 2:

C Leslie Northwest
F Martin Waverly
F Loop Webster
G Yates Valley
G Ondera Oak Hill

Bench: (No particular order)
Bendolph Burg
Hall Northwest (can break anyones press)
Kretzer Waverly
Slone Oak Hill
Stegman Burg


Bandwagoner
Freshman Team
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:27 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by Bandwagoner »

Legend, you have a pretty good team. But you have made some vital mistakes, one you have Jake Kretzer on the bench, he probably the 2nd best player in the league. Second, I have never even heard of this Hall kid?? And I watched NW play twice. Why wouldnt you have Johnston(Waverly) or Utely(Valley). Two players who actually heavily influence games, & are standouts. A good team, but those are my corrections...


soccerfix
Varsity
Posts: 684
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:19 pm

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by soccerfix »

Pressbreaker wrote:That doesn't make any sense....
"best possible scenario" is Webster beating Oak Hill and finishing in second place outright after another Waverly loss to Oak Hill. If you mean probable, then you got it right...
I think either team could beat Oak Hill with a little luck. The Oaks play a slow-tempo, low-scoring style which could give Webster or Waverly the chance to hang around.


Good luck beating Oak Hill.


User avatar
The_Legend_of_Northwest
All State
Posts: 1185
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:17 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by The_Legend_of_Northwest »

Tiger4 wrote:Legend, you have a pretty good team. But you have made some vital mistakes, one you have Jake Kretzer on the bench, he probably the 2nd best player in the league. Second, I have never even heard of this Hall kid?? And I watched NW play twice. Why wouldnt you have Johnston(Waverly) or Utely(Valley). Two players who actually heavily influence games, & are standouts. A good team, but those are my corrections...


Kretzer I have on the bench because i chose my starting 5 and thought 'Oh Crap i forgot Kretzer'. Chaise Hall is #34 on Northwest and has no ego which would gel greatly with a team like this, he wouldn't care if he didnt shoot, and the kid is a great ball handler, you can only have so many scorers on a team before ego's get in the way. Putting Utley or Johnston on the team would mean more shots needed for those individuals. (I actually not sure of who exactly Johnston is, I only saw one Waverly game this year.)


Mohawk
Waterboy
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:10 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by Mohawk »

Let's not forget about Kreig Crabtree. He has 56 threes this season and is a good player. Don't leave out Kenny Crabtree either he gives all he has when he's playing and has an impact on many of their games.


all-time athlete
JV Team
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:37 pm

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by all-time athlete »

These lists are always so complex cause you can't really consider all of the intangibles...and I would think halls assist to turnover ratio would easily be in the top 3 in the league


ovc fan
Varsity
Posts: 480
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 11:36 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by ovc fan »

This post is hilarious. lol. Why is everybody getting upset over a game that will NEVER happen? Reminds me of......if you build it they will come. lol. I give you credit though. probably a better all star team than my ovc. Too bad they are all not on a team. We could boast a state champion in the Southeast.


User avatar
pan-man
Freshman Team
Posts: 104
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:07 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by pan-man »

Don't you like how no one has put an SOC I roster up


User avatar
TheDarkKnight
Freshman Team
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:26 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by TheDarkKnight »

^^ :lol: I agree


User avatar
TheDarkKnight
Freshman Team
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:26 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by TheDarkKnight »

Swanker Pine wrote:Make your own list, Roeback and Kretzer are the better players from what i saw. I would take Stegman over Hank Leslie ANY DAY of the week. No Oaks will be in this game anyway so whats it matter

Swanker.. ITs ROBACK not ROEBACK.. :lol: :lol:


eaglegrad
Riding the Bench
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:55 pm

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by eaglegrad »

From the point guard position, how could you take Hall over Ondera, Yates, Scott or Bendolph. Hall is 5th pest PG at best. I mean seriously. Hall's downfall over the past years has been handling pressure. Most teams that play NW go into the game knowing that if you pressure their guards, they will turn the ball over.


Eaglesnest
All State
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 12:56 pm

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by Eaglesnest »

I have not seen all of the SOC1 teams, but this is as good as I can do with the teams that I have seen/followed:

Eastern-Thornsberry, McVey, Wheeler, Montgomery, Lawhorn (any of these 5 may lead the team at any game)

Symmes Valley-Tibbs and Taylor

Green-Pierce and Ratcliff

Clay-Valentine

East-Garret boys

New Boston-?

Notre Dame-?

Western-Bakenhaster and exchange student

Here is aplace for the SOC1 folks to start with


User avatar
-varsity-
JV Team
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 11:18 am

Re: SOC I vs. SOC II

Post by -varsity- »

Mine would have to be like this..

Eastern- McVey or Thorsberry

Symmes Valley- Tibbs or Taylor

Green- Ratcliff

Clay- Valentine or Lawson because his size.

East- Jordan and Jon Garrett

New Boston- Steven Russell or Levi Horsely

Notre Dame- Brad Perrion

Western- Kory Bakenhaster


Soc II-

Oak Hill- Ondera
Webster- Loop and Scott
Northwest- Leslie
Burg- Stegman and Bendolph
Valley- Utley and Yates
Waverly- Roback and Kretzer
Minford- Aaron Oscech and Caleb Cowgill
West- Trevon Pendleton


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”