Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
My opinion is very different then that. Fort Frye returns the most 16 Srs 4 1st team all district players. The most the have returned in years. 2. Caldwell they lose a ton but return 2 of the Ivey Brothers and Jason Allen nice program. 3. Trail last year in the league should be decent. 4. Shenandoah return a ton but lose stud in Vanfossen. 5. Monroe Central only had 29 players lost a nice group of Srs including Hooper and maybe Circosta. They do return Allman. 6. Frontier lost all the offensive production could go (0-10)
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
1: Fort Frye - lots coming back.
2-3: Caldwell or Trail - a coin toss. Caldwell loses a lot, Trail returns a lot.
4: MC - Never count Jay out.
5: Shenandoah - Maybe a year away?
6. Frontier - Not sure, but it sounds like they lose a lot.
2-3: Caldwell or Trail - a coin toss. Caldwell loses a lot, Trail returns a lot.
4: MC - Never count Jay out.
5: Shenandoah - Maybe a year away?
6. Frontier - Not sure, but it sounds like they lose a lot.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 189
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:36 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
1) Fort Frye- Return most key pieces when everyone else loses them.
2) Buckeye Trail- Has a bunch of seniors that will make plays.
3) Caldwell- Lost major pieces that you can't replace. Still have a few Iveys, Allen, and Archer in the middle who can dominate games
4) Monroe Central- Hopper and coachingwill keep them in games when they shouldn't be in
5) Shenandoah- Still young and will miss vanfossen worse than they think
6 Frontier- Hope they can at least make a few games competitive but I don't see it
2) Buckeye Trail- Has a bunch of seniors that will make plays.
3) Caldwell- Lost major pieces that you can't replace. Still have a few Iveys, Allen, and Archer in the middle who can dominate games
4) Monroe Central- Hopper and coachingwill keep them in games when they shouldn't be in
5) Shenandoah- Still young and will miss vanfossen worse than they think
6 Frontier- Hope they can at least make a few games competitive but I don't see it
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Anthony Winters will be missed on both sides of the ball but they return 4 lineman that started a game or more.
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
I thought this was Trails last year in the PVC....or is it after next season?
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Monroe will be down hopper isnt going to games for them no size an i herd alleman isnt playing an some orhers they will have small backs that are fast but no size hopper is aveage an pvc man must be family to him cause he talks like he is great look at numbers fort will be top river wont play anyone caldwell will be ok trail will be good monroe might be 5an 5
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
1.) Caldwell=Not popular so far, but I feel they will step up to the plate
2.) Monroe Central= Getting back to where they should be,no one sees it coming
3.) Fort Frye= Happy after last season, chokes with all the talent returning
4.) Buckeye Trail= Returns alot from an atrocious team. woohoo
5.) Frontier= Upset special being better than Shenandoah
6.) Shenandoah= Build for 2017
2.) Monroe Central= Getting back to where they should be,no one sees it coming
3.) Fort Frye= Happy after last season, chokes with all the talent returning
4.) Buckeye Trail= Returns alot from an atrocious team. woohoo
5.) Frontier= Upset special being better than Shenandoah
6.) Shenandoah= Build for 2017
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Stan_Marsh wrote:1.) Caldwell=Not popular so far, but I feel they will step up to the plate
2.) Monroe Central= Getting back to where they should be,no one sees it coming
3.) Fort Frye= Happy after last season, chokes with all the talent returning
4.) Buckeye Trail= Returns alot from an atrocious team. woohoo
5.) Frontier= Upset special being better than Shenandoah
6.) Shenandoah= Build for 2017
Can't see Fort losing a league game they are the real deal.
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:59 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
It will be interesting that is for sure. All I know for sure is, is when Sunday gets here I will be counting down the days till next fall.EasternDspy wrote:Stan_Marsh wrote:1.) Caldwell=Not popular so far, but I feel they will step up to the plate
2.) Monroe Central= Getting back to where they should be,no one sees it coming
3.) Fort Frye= Happy after last season, chokes with all the talent returning
4.) Buckeye Trail= Returns alot from an atrocious team. woohoo
5.) Frontier= Upset special being better than Shenandoah
6.) Shenandoah= Build for 2017
Can't see Fort losing a league game they are the real deal.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2015 9:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Hooper is only a jr.EasternDspy wrote:My opinion is very different then that. Fort Frye returns the most 16 Srs 4 1st team all district players. The most the have returned in years. 2. Caldwell they lose a ton but return 2 of the Ivey Brothers and Jason Allen nice program. 3. Trail last year in the league should be decent. 4. Shenandoah return a ton but lose stud in Vanfossen. 5. Monroe Central only had 29 players lost a nice group of Srs including Hooper and maybe Circosta. They do return Allman. 6. Frontier lost all the offensive production could go (0-10)
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Rumor is there is talk of 2 divisions in the PVC. Additions possible. Meadowbrook, Cambridge, Warren, and 1 more team.
- GoBucks1047
- Varsity
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:44 am
- Location: Scioto County
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Hm... This is interesting.rockcoach wrote:Rumor is there is talk of 2 divisions in the PVC. Additions possible. Meadowbrook, Cambridge, Warren, and 1 more team.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Wow did not see this coming, Would be really interesting to see how they split it up. Dosnt seem like it would benefit the bigger schools to play D7 schedule come playoff timerockcoach wrote:Rumor is there is talk of 2 divisions in the PVC. Additions possible. Meadowbrook, Cambridge, Warren, and 1 more team.
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
I heard this information from a principal. Only talk of course right now. Plenty of schools out there looking to change or start leagues. ECOL is suppose to have teams leaving.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Well maybe Barnesville should jump on board. Was told by some ADs that Barnesville would join if they didn't have to travel to Fort Frye. Mostly Barnesvilles coaches are dodging the Cadets.
- LICKING COUNTY FAN
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 46560
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:05 am
- Location: Buckeye Lake, Ohio
- Contact:
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
I like many of the teams in this league, but always root harder for Buckeye Trail.
Hopefully they have a Thursday game, I can get to in 16.
Hopefully they have a Thursday game, I can get to in 16.