SHL Week #5 Scores and Standings

[Nobullhere]

So Tribemaniac - how was the inside out? What about ball distribution?

Did you ever get around to posting the turnover, steal & rebound stats from Manchester game - bet not. Of course, you are biased and if your goal is to recognize a couple players and diminish the word TEAM - congrats, you are doing a nice job...

[streetballer]

it was a poor officiated game..im surprised no one got hurt which im glad no one did

[TribeManiac10]

So Tribemaniac - how was the inside out? What about ball distribution?

Did you ever get around to posting the turnover, steal & rebound stats from Manchester game - bet not. Of course, you are biased and if your goal is to recognize a couple players and diminish the word TEAM - congrats, you are doing a nice job...

Seems like theres a latabullhere. The inside out and ball distribution was great tonight. In the Manchester game there was a lot of turnovers and they beat us on the boards most of the game. I dont see what you get out of coming on here and posting this garbage. If you dont like reading what I post stay off the site.

[peeblesfan97]

PHS v. WUHS. The lack of fouls called made for a quick game as I was in the car and leaving at a few minutes after 9 at an 8 o'clock start time.

[jchitwood]

I still need a lot of results, especially from the brown county tournament...any help?

[airforcejm]

Georgetown and Eastern won their games and will face off against each other in the championship. I heard the results on C103 today but cant remember any of the scores.

[numberonefan]

way to go tribemaniac............very ignorent post nobullhere! Tribemaniac always has great posts and always tries to point out all the positives of players and the whole team. That being said........is there something wrong with recognizing a player who had a superb night and accomplished something you will likely not see again? Who let the dogs out?

[jchitwood]

So Tribemaniac - how was the inside out? What about ball distribution?

Did you ever get around to posting the turnover, steal & rebound stats from Manchester game - bet not. Of course, you are biased and if your goal is to recognize a couple players and diminish the word TEAM - congrats, you are doing a nice job...

I think it's funny you're accusing a poster named "TribeManiac" of being biased. Did you expect Tribe to get on here and brag about traveling calls and missed foul shots?

Tribe is the rare fan that doesn't just cheerlead for his team, he makes an effort to make the whole SHL look good. When Manchester lost to eastern, I wouldn't expect Houndsare4Real to come on here and brag about easy layups his team missed (don;t know if they missed any layups, just using that as an example)... We all support our teams by accentuating the positive after a loss, as well as being constructive about what went wrong and praising the competition.

Yeah, we (Peebles) lost a tough one, but any fan would be crazy not to recognize the silver lining of what Blake accomplished.

[jimmy chipwood]

Whiteoak/New Boston score?

[jchitwood]

Whiteoak/New Boston score?

I'm getting my info from the Lynchburg Clay tournament topic.

[jchitwood]

Just got the scores from the Brown County Tournament...couldn't find the New Boston Whiteoak score yet...

[roushfan123]

JChitwood,

I appreciate how you cover the SHL on scores and standings.

However, your overall standings has Manchester as 1-1 in the league;

Team - W/L - GB - SHL - STREAK - PCT.

PEB / 5-1 / - / 1-1 / W1 / .833
MN / 5-1 / - / 1-1 / W2 / .833
RIP / 5-1 / - / 2-0 / W2 / .833
ESB /4-2 / 1 / 1-2 / W2 / .667
NAD / 3-2 / 1.5 / 3-0 / L1 / .600
WHK / 4-4 / 2 / 3-0 / W1 / .500
LYN / 2-6 / 4 / 1-2 / L1 / .250
WU / 1-5 / 4 / 0-3 / L3 / .167
FAY / 1-6 / 4.5 / 0-3 / L6 / .148
FRD / 0-6 / 5 / 0-2 / L6 / .000


DIVISION 1
Team - SHL - PCT. - GB - W/L - PCT. - STREAK

NAD / 3-0 / 1.000 / - / 3-2 / .600 / L1
RIP / 2-0 / 1.000 / .5 / 5-1 / .833 / W2
ESB / 1-2 / .333 / 2 / 4-2 / .667 / W2
LYN / 1-2 / .333 / 2 / 2-6 / .250 / L1
WU / 0-3 / .000 / 3 / 1-5 / .167 / L3



DIVISION 2
Team - SHL - PCT. - GB - W/L - PCT. - STREAK

WHK / 3-0 / 1.000 / - / 4-4 / .500 / W1
MAN / 2-0 / 1.000 / .5 / 5-1 / .833 / W3
PEB / 1-1 / .500 / 1.5 / 5-1 / .833 / W1
FRD / 0-2 / .000 / 2.5 / 0-6 / .000 / L6
FAY / 0-3 / .000 / 3 / 1-6 / .142 / L6

The DIVISION 2 is correct.

Shouldn't the OVERALL be:
MN / 5-1 / - / 2-0 / W3 / .833
RIP / 5-1 / - / 2-0 / W2 / .833
PEB / 5-1 / - / 1-1 / W1 / .833
ESB /4-2 / 1 / 1-2 / W2 / .667
NAD / 3-2 / 1.5 / 3-0 / L1 / .600
WHK / 4-4 / 2 / 3-0 / W1 / .500
LYN / 2-6 / 4 / 1-2 / L1 / .250
WU / 1-5 / 4 / 0-3 / L3 / .167
FAY / 1-6 / 4.5 / 0-3 / L6 / .148
FRD / 0-6 / 5 / 0-2 / L6 / .000

Again thanks for your work!

[jchitwood]

roushfan,

Thanks for catching my mistake. I must have changed Manchester's league ranking while changing Peebles' by accident (or maybe I did it subconciously)....I left the top 3 in the overall in alphabetical order because their overall records are the same.