Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

wink · Post by **wink** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:46 pm

Have to go with Minford at home.

Oaksfan95 · Post by **Oaksfan95** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:16 pm

Keep counting the oaks out minford winning by two or more scores the oaks d has only gave up two touchdowns this year rock hill scored on the second team and one trick play from Alexander wellston didn't put up 19 on us oaks 21-7

Gecko · Post by **Gecko** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:01 pm

Good luck to the Oaks and Coach Dugan from the Trimble Tomcats.

2013FALCON · Post by **2013FALCON** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:49 pm

I don't count any team out on any given Friday. I think this will be the toughest game for both teams so far with both being 4-0. I have seen a lot of heart in this Minford team this season. These boys have stepped up and I have seen improvement in each game they have played. Haven't heard much about Oak Hill, but since they are undefeated too they are no slouch team either.

Look for Minford to pull this one out.

Good Luck to my Mighty Minford Falcons!!!

dreamweaver · Post by **dreamweaver** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:25 pm

I would say a win is in store for the mighty Minford Falcons.

SPAMONY · Post by **SPAMONY** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:45 pm

Minford by more than the experts think

NewEra · Post by **NewEra** » Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:47 pm

I think this game will be in hand by halftime.

noles_fan · Post by **noles_fan** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:10 am

Minford at home...This should be another good one for the falcons

Neutron Man · Post by **Neutron Man** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:32 am

Not sure what I feel about about the Oaks or the Falcons. Both have played a perfect season so far. Though both have played a very soft schedule. With the exception of Piketon which is 2-2 but still not a GREAT win. I think Minford wins, but I do not think that the SOC or southern Ohio has an identity of how good or bad these teams really are. Sad to say I think the only way this season the Oaks get recognition is to beat Ironton. Minford, Needs to beat the 3 teams on your schedule with a winning record or you will drop FAST from the rankings. No secondary points!

NewEra · Post by **NewEra** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:01 am

Neutron Man wrote:Not sure what I feel about about the Oaks or the Falcons. Both have played a perfect season so far. Though both have played a very soft schedule. With the exception of Piketon which is 2-2 but still not a GREAT win. I think Minford wins, but I do not think that the SOC or southern Ohio has an identity of how good or bad these teams really are. Sad to say I think the only way this season the Oaks get recognition is to beat Ironton. Minford, Needs to beat the 3 teams on your schedule with a winning record or you will drop FAST from the rankings. No secondary points!

Minford can go 8-2 and cruise into the playoffs IMO.. however I do not think that will happen. :122249 . Neurton Man, are you a valley supporter? Sorry if I am mistaken, but if you are, a valley fan talking about a soft schedule thus far? are you kidding me?

Bleeding Red · Post by **Bleeding Red** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:15 am

I have heard that Oak Hill is a very physical team. They play very good defense. We will find out tonight how physical they are and if their defense is good enough to stop a wing t offense that is putting up sick rushing yards this year.

Should be a good game. If Minford eliminates the silly mistakes, comes out ready to play and protects the football, they will be fine.

Neutron Man · Post by **Neutron Man** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:19 am

NewEra wrote:
Neutron Man wrote:Not sure what I feel about about the Oaks or the Falcons. Both have played a perfect season so far. Though both have played a very soft schedule. With the exception of Piketon which is 2-2 but still not a GREAT win. I think Minford wins, but I do not think that the SOC or southern Ohio has an identity of how good or bad these teams really are. Sad to say I think the only way this season the Oaks get recognition is to beat Ironton. Minford, Needs to beat the 3 teams on your schedule with a winning record or you will drop FAST from the rankings. No secondary points!
Minford can go 8-2 and cruise into the playoffs IMO.. however I do not think that will happen. :122249 . Neurton Man, are you a valley supporter? Sorry if I am mistaken, but if you are, a valley fan talking about a soft schedule thus far? are you kidding me?

Far from it! Why would you think I have ties to Valley?

Bleeding Red · Post by **Bleeding Red** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:21 am

NewEra wrote:
Neutron Man wrote:Not sure what I feel about about the Oaks or the Falcons. Both have played a perfect season so far. Though both have played a very soft schedule. With the exception of Piketon which is 2-2 but still not a GREAT win. I think Minford wins, but I do not think that the SOC or southern Ohio has an identity of how good or bad these teams really are. Sad to say I think the only way this season the Oaks get recognition is to beat Ironton. Minford, Needs to beat the 3 teams on your schedule with a winning record or you will drop FAST from the rankings. No secondary points!
Minford can go 8-2 and cruise into the playoffs IMO.. however I do not think that will happen. :122249 . Neurton Man, are you a valley supporter? Sorry if I am mistaken, but if you are, a valley fan talking about a soft schedule thus far? are you kidding me?

Valley has 12 Level 2 points this year.

Minford has 18. Still not great, its a little under the average right now in Reg 15 as far as the top 8.

And Minford has a 99% chance of making the playoffs with 8 wins and 72% with 7 wins. Valley has to get 8 wins to make it in and that is not for a guaranteed spot.

Oak Hill has a better chance right now of making the playoffs than Valley does, and that is taking in to account they lose tonight at Minford.

nutronron2012 · Post by **nutronron2012** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:28 am

Why is it Valley is coming up in an Oak Hill @ Minford thread? Are we that big of a threat?

Minford still has 6 weeks before they have to worry about Valley or our "VERY WEAK" schedule. The only difference in our schedules so far is Minford has played Piketon and Valley has played Coal Grove (who is still a very good team, and who will probably win out after tonight and win their league again) still alot of football to be played.

NewEra · Post by **NewEra** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:30 am

nutronron2012 wrote:Why is it Valley is coming up in an Oak Hill @ Minford thread? Are we that big of a threat? Minford still has 6 weeks before they have to worry about Valley or our "VERY WEAK" schedule. The only difference in our schedules so far is Minford has played Piketon and Valley has played Coal Grove (who is still a very good team, and who will probably win out after tonight and win their league again) still alot of football to be played.

Yeah big time threat, after that 1 win you have logged over Minford in the past 5 years....

nutronron2012 · Post by **nutronron2012** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:32 am

:aaaaa24

nutronron2012 · Post by **nutronron2012** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:44 am

NewEra wrote:
Neutron Man wrote:Not sure what I feel about about the Oaks or the Falcons. Both have played a perfect season so far. Though both have played a very soft schedule. With the exception of Piketon which is 2-2 but still not a GREAT win. I think Minford wins, but I do not think that the SOC or southern Ohio has an identity of how good or bad these teams really are. Sad to say I think the only way this season the Oaks get recognition is to beat Ironton. Minford, Needs to beat the 3 teams on your schedule with a winning record or you will drop FAST from the rankings. No secondary points!
Minford can go 8-2 and cruise into the playoffs IMO.. however I do not think that will happen. :122249 . Neurton Man, are you a valley supporter? Sorry if I am mistaken, but if you are, a valley fan talking about a soft schedule thus far? are you kidding me?

You better hope 8-2 will get you in. Because thats what you'll be if you can get by Oak Hill, which i believe you will.

NewEra · Post by **NewEra** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:52 am

nutronron2012 wrote:
NewEra wrote:
Neutron Man wrote:Not sure what I feel about about the Oaks or the Falcons. Both have played a perfect season so far. Though both have played a very soft schedule. With the exception of Piketon which is 2-2 but still not a GREAT win. I think Minford wins, but I do not think that the SOC or southern Ohio has an identity of how good or bad these teams really are. Sad to say I think the only way this season the Oaks get recognition is to beat Ironton. Minford, Needs to beat the 3 teams on your schedule with a winning record or you will drop FAST from the rankings. No secondary points!
Minford can go 8-2 and cruise into the playoffs IMO.. however I do not think that will happen. :122249 . Neurton Man, are you a valley supporter? Sorry if I am mistaken, but if you are, a valley fan talking about a soft schedule thus far? are you kidding me?
You better hope 8-2 will get you in. Because thats what you'll be if you can get by Oak Hill, which i believe you will.

8-2 will get Minford in, not like Valley with their non-conference, no chance at 7-3/8-2.

nutronron2012 · Post by **nutronron2012** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:53 am

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=171902586159357

NewEra · Post by **NewEra** » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:55 am

Link will not work, what are you trying to link?

SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)

Re: Week Five: Oak Hill (4-0) at Minford (4-0)