Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Lady jeeps or Lady Falcons

Poll ended at Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:28 pm

 
Total votes: 0

Webster pride
Freshman Team
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 9:33 am

Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Webster pride »

Who you got winning this battle of unbeatens?


ManitouDan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7840
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by ManitouDan »

I'll never pick against SW again ..... so SW . .... JK , should be a good one, but only if Minford is hitting 3's or finds a way to penetrate and score . would like to see this one . MD


Webster pride
Freshman Team
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 9:33 am

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Webster pride »

head on out to webster monday and watch it! lol on your comment cause i have SW jeeps having a very good chance against everyone on schedule and at the same time i see alot of teams that we have to show up and play but like you saw at OH our speed kills and its like a different gear so far this year~


favabeans
Varsity
Posts: 574
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 4:45 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by favabeans »

Minford is guard heavy so my Jeeps will have to play fast and smart defense just like they did against the Oaks. I think we are bigger in the post and that will help. The Jeeps are playing with a lot of heart and great teamwork. Should be a good game.


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6585
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

Jeeps by 11. Should be a great game


AAU Scout
Waterboy
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:40 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by AAU Scout »

Missed the game. Who won?


cave canem
Freshman Team
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:40 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by cave canem »

Minford won. Don't remember the exact score, but it was around 40-30.


ManitouDan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7840
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by ManitouDan »

I was high on Minford before it was cool ..... lol MD


D4hero
Freshman Team
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:12 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by D4hero »

ManitouDan wrote:I was high on Minford before it was cool ..... lol MD

ha D4


mglight88
SE
Posts: 2001
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:15 am

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by mglight88 »

Congrats Lady Falcons on a 42-30 victory over the South Webster Jeeps.
Keep it going!


bluedude62
Varsity
Posts: 491
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 1:31 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by bluedude62 »

WOW !!!


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6585
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

Absolutely ugly game for both sides of the coin. Jeeps had a lot of good looks that just didn't fall. SW is going to have to figure out how to penetrate the zone real fast if they want to hang next time


Fundamentals
Varsity
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Fundamentals »

Minford made shots early then rode the free throw line, believed 12-16 or something, Webster I think shot 8? Give or take..Minford played man, but was in such help def looked like a zone. When u are not hitting it is easy to do that..SW didn't play their game no attacking on transition, no aggressiveness on defense. When refs allow the ame to be rough, then you have to adjust to that and get more aggressive on both offense and especially def. the one girl on Minford must ave knocked down Websters girls 7-8 times before it was called a couple of times in the 4th, Till SW had to foul it was a 4-6 pt game, and when u miss 17 paint shots hard to win. Should be a good game the next time these two play.. Going to be a exciting time in SOC 2.


little doggy
Freshman Team
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by little doggy »

Minford played man not zone, difference in the game was hustle , rebounding and when south webster penetrated the lane they were contested on each shot, as far as the knocking down girls that seemed to happen both ways if I recall especially on the one arm take down .what was south webster shooting percentage outside the lane, think that was a big difference in the game


D4hero
Freshman Team
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:12 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by D4hero »

Swanker Pine wrote:Absolutely ugly game for both sides of the coin. Jeeps had a lot of good looks that just didn't fall. SW is going to have to figure out how to penetrate the zone real fast if they want to hang next time

andddddd Swanker yet again displays his complete lack of basic basketball knowledge. Minford played man you goon, how could you not even notice that? This is why you are one of the least credible, and least respected members on the basketball forums.


The Ghost of Swanker
SEOPS H
Posts: 6585
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by The Ghost of Swanker »

I don't even post but maybe twice a week but people still hate the Piner. Get over yourself


Esully63
Freshman Team
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Esully63 »

D4hero wrote:
Swanker Pine wrote:Absolutely ugly game for both sides of the coin. Jeeps had a lot of good looks that just didn't fall. SW is going to have to figure out how to penetrate the zone real fast if they want to hang next time

andddddd Swanker yet again displays his complete lack of basic basketball knowledge. Minford played man you goon, how could you not even notice that? This is why you are one of the least credible, and least respected members on the basketball forums.
I'm sorry to interrupt your fun but if you keep you backside defense at the paint it does look an awful lot likes a zone. For a man defense that paint was incredibly crowded last night.


Fundamentals
Varsity
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Fundamentals »

It looked like a zone cues Minford bigs were in help to stop penetration and were not worried about minfords bigs and when u r playing man and players don't move it is easier to stand in the lane. The Webster girls could have enervated the zone easier..


Esully63
Freshman Team
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Esully63 »

Shooterindagym wrote:It looked like a zone cues Minford bigs were in help to stop penetration and were not worried about minfords bigs and when u r playing man and players don't move it is easier to stand in the lane. The Webster girls could have enervated the zone easier..
Could you clarify that? It is coming across kind of garbled! I think you are just basically repeating what I had said. With a couple of bigs added, whatever you meant by that!


Fundamentals
Varsity
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Minford 3-0 vs South Webster 3-0 12-3-12

Post by Fundamentals »

Yeah typing on a iPad stinks, lol. Repeating wat I and you said, as far as the bigs comment goes. Websters post players were struggling from the field, when that happens minfords post could just camp in the lane making it seem like a zone. When Websters guards learn to pull up for the 10 footer and the posts players cut to the bucket watch out..plus from wat I seen, SW needs to play a little more physical at times, the Conkey kid was just out muscling the post players, at times yes she was fouling, but it isn't a foul if the whistle don't blow.


Post Reply

Return to “Girls Basketball”