White House Threatens Executive Orders

General Chat
Post Reply
ManitouDan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7840
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by ManitouDan »

Historically when two "dissenting" sides continue to dissent brute force decides the victor .. Whenever you are done dissenting let me know abuck


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by dazed&confused »

tigercannon71 wrote:Not yet DC, not yet.
No, not ever. I would rise up against gun confiscation. But sensible regulation? That is doable. What is wrong with universal background checks?


Tigercannon71
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 28648
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:14 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Tigercannon71 »

Nothing wrong with Universal background checks. That should be done with every gun purchase.


ManitouDan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7840
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by ManitouDan »

Legislators are not just calling for background checks, chuckle the tool schumer. Just today ask gun sellers to stop selling assault weapons , as determined by democrat legislators , and certain clips . Again as determined by democrat legislatures .. If it were just background Checks were the words exectutive order be getting thrown around !??


User avatar
kantuckyII
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12198
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:43 am

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by kantuckyII »

Libs might be able to do 'em some trading right now. Perhaps a clear written definition in the Second Amendment that further guarantees the law abiding sane citizen to always own weapons for some swapping with registration and stuff? As I said, that NY bunch publishing that list of registered owners shot them in the foot, big time! what did it do? only served to deeply bring about even more mistrust. Stupid stupid liberals!

Look at Chicago, over 446 school age children shot there last year and yet they have the toughest gun laws in the country!

These list were compiled, Mid-December 2012. Yet. Law abiding citizens have to go through hops to be able to protect themselves and as far as I know, weren't allowed to even have a CCW licenses. Thugs knew that they were an absolute unstoppable force when they were carrying a weapon among those who were law abiding people!
446 School Age Children Shot in Chicago so Far This Year
THE LIST OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN SHOT IN 2012

18 year old- 110

17 year old- 99

16 year old- 89

15 year old- 62

14 year old- 39

13 year old- 21

12 year old- 10

11 year old- 2

10 year old- 3

9 year old- 1

7 year old- 3

6 year old- 2

5 year old- 1

4 year old- 1

3 year old- 1

1 year old- 2
THE LIST OF MURDERED SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN 2012
18 YEARS OLD- 15

17 YEARS OLD- 16

16 YEARS OLD- 16

15 YEARS OLD- 6

14 YEARS OLD- 4

13 YEARS OLD- 2

12 YEARS OLD- 1

7 YEARS OLD- 1

6 YEARS OLD-


Tigercannon71
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 28648
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:14 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Tigercannon71 »

As long as there are guns, the individual that wants a gun for a crime is going to have one and going to get it. The only person who's going to be penalized and have difficulty is the law-abiding citizen, who then cannot have it if he wants protection-the protection of a weapon in his home, for home protection.

Ronald Reagan.


User avatar
kantuckyII
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12198
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:43 am

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by kantuckyII »

LOL, what they're also not thinking about is it's not rocket science to make guns today. It wouldn't be that hard. Heck, you can even print a gun made of composites and people with just common machine tools could make them as well...at UNREAL prices I'd imagine on the black market! could you imagine?

I mean, you have guys who took chemistry classes in the 60's and the 70's simply to learn now to make drugs. A two year machinist class could get a guy all set up with gun making


Bighitsinc
Varsity
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Bighitsinc »

abuck76 wrote:You simply have no clue......... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: .....Love ya though........ :12224

Spoken like a real girly man :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


User avatar
abuck76
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8642
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:28 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by abuck76 »

Oh, great ...another with nothing substantive to add........... :12224


User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 287091
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by noreply66 »

abuck76 wrote:Oh, great ...another with nothing substantive to add........... :12224

:aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8 :aaaaa8


ManitouDan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7840
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by ManitouDan »

bithitsinc -- dont insult girls everywhere by calling abuck a girly man... ( BTW notice the arrogance of abuck yet again ... YOU have nothing of substance to give , always accusing people of being beneath him )


User avatar
abuck76
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8642
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:28 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by abuck76 »

Nope, just being honest.............Nothing substantive from you on your post either......Stay on topic.........President Obama can issue Excutive Orders.....Constitutional...... :12224


Bighitsinc
Varsity
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Bighitsinc »

abuck76 wrote:Nope, just being honest.............Nothing substantive from you on your post either......Stay on topic.........President Obama can issue Excutive Orders.....Constitutional...... :12224
Since we are being honest and calling them as we see em,,,,,,,,,,,,
I believe abuck acts more like a doe and thinks he is abuck


User avatar
abuck76
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8642
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:28 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by abuck76 »

Nothing substantive from you on your post......Stay on topic.........President Obama can issue Excutive Orders.....Constitutional................. :12224


User avatar
mustang_lvr
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 45784
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:45 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by mustang_lvr »

abuck76 is the man
his name callesr are just kids that can't come up with words of his level. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: oops i am sorry that wasn't funny because it is the truth.


Bighitsinc
Varsity
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Bighitsinc »

abuck76 wrote:The problem with NYC regs, is nothing....They are great......But that is not where most of the guns in NY are coming from...........The guns are coming from W.Va. who have some of the most leniet laws and regs.........NYers bring drugs to WVa and trade for guns.........These guys can make more money in NY selling guns than drugs.....How crazy.......The key is strong regs in every state...........And the old standby excuse , "take the weapons from the honest CITIZEN and only the dishonest will have them.... " just does not hold water.... :12224

almostabuck,
Do a little research on "Fast and Furious" and get back to me on that :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
While you are at it do a little research on The Bill of Rights and explain the references to "The People" wording, and let me know who you think "The People" are.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."


ManitouDan
SEOPS H
Posts: 7840
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 9:09 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by ManitouDan »

Abuck hangs with people at exactly his level... kids in school who he truly can bully . He trys the same heavy handed crap on here and just gets embarrassed .


Bighitsinc
Varsity
Posts: 450
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 6:55 pm

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Bighitsinc »

I think abuck is more like adoe :lol: :lol:
And why is it that every time I read his posting a Steven Tyler song plays in my head?????


Dude Looks Like A Lady :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by Paladin »

Notice the word "REGULATED" in the amendment. All courts recognize that. Its just the idiots who want to ignore that. SEnsible gun regulation is possible and still have guns but the hysteria of the Far Right is just flat dumb. Always amazing to me that the kooks on the far right profess to loving the Constitution but don't understand what it really says until its pointed out to them and then they want to argue something the Constitution doesn't say and the Courts agree. Ideology is one thing but sheer stupidity is another.
Last edited by Paladin on Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: White House Threatens Executive Orders

Post by dazed&confused »

Paladin wrote:Notice the word "REGULATED" in the amendment. All courts recognize that. Its just the idiots who want to ignore that. SEnsible gun reulation is possible and still have guns but the hysteria of the Far Right is just flat dumb. Always amazing to me that the kooks on the far right profess to loving the Constitution but don't understand what it really says until its pointed out to them and then they want to argue something the Constitution doesn't say and the Courts agree. Ideology is one thing but sheer stupidity is another.
I would add-

World English Dictionary
interpret (ɪnˈtɜːprɪt)

— vb
1. ( tr ) to clarify or explain the meaning of; elucidate
2. ( tr ) to construe the significance or intention of


..........as in this is what the Supreme Court does on Constitutional matters

The court would find that the extremely ambiguous term "arms" would need to be defined. Does that mean ordinary citizens have the right to keep armed missiles? No, prudent judgment would say that is extreme. The level of what is acceptable is, therefore, what this whole assault weapons and massive clips argument is about. Keep in mind, too, that the Framers drafted the Constitution in 1787 when the country was young and vulnerable to attack from any number of belligerents. The common practice at the time was to have a MILITIA of common local citizens who could assemble at quick notice to resist dangers. The image most have are of musket-toting farmers. No one would take away any arms such as hunting rifles or guns typically used for home defense.


Post Reply

Return to “The Off season”