2017 Logan Cheiftains
- 1987chieftains
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 7637
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
- Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
CW rolls into the swamp and just crushes the Chiefs 42-13. There is no sugar coating it the offense was absolutely terrible! The QB makes some bad decisions throwing the ball and it doesn't help he has constant pressure forcing him to move around a lot. There were no running lanes and when there was a penalty brought it back. I think the defense might be improved a little, but it's hard to tell because they got no help from the offense. Logan's only points were scored by the defense on a pick 6 and fumble return. Just another bad forgettable night is about all I can say!
- 1987chieftains
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 7637
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
- Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Too many long runs against the defense.
Freshman won
Freshman won
Last edited by noreply66 on Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
GO LOGAN..The anti-Christ is among us
- 1987chieftains
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 7637
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
- Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
I am changing my prediction from 7-3/6-4 to 3-7/2-8. If that O line doesnt get any better and dbs don't attack, it's going to be a longer year then last year.
AT THE RESERVATION
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21246
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Wow! Well, Sounds like Burke has some major work to do. Still time to clean up, but it don't sound good.
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Yep CW did get some big ones but I think it was more from the defense just being worn out from being out there so much. Most of the big ones came in the third quarter when it was obvious the offense wasn't going to score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0306e/0306e2e994495f14690d99e18eab5742dece5a1b" alt="Sad :("
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12991
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Same thing happened with Athens vs Canal Winchester last year. Basically they had three plays on offense. Those three plays were long TD's thoughcbolt wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:43 pmYep CW did get some big ones but I think it was more from the defense just being worn out from being out there so much. Most of the big ones came in the third quarter when it was obvious the offense wasn't going to score.![]()
-
- All State
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:29 pm
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
I agree with this.Paladin wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:20 pm Locos
I like the addition of Canal. Anything to maintain contact with Central Ohio teams and get exposure. OCC or Mid State. Logan needs to get out of playing SEO and move on to developing relationships in Central Ohio. League comes quicker that way.
- TRENCHFOOT
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 21246
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
- Location: ChieftainCountry
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Sounds like the O-line needs lots of work to get in gear. How strong of an arm does the QB have, Bolt?cbolt wrote: Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:43 pmYep CW did get some big ones but I think it was more from the defense just being worn out from being out there so much. Most of the big ones came in the third quarter when it was obvious the offense wasn't going to score.![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0306e/0306e2e994495f14690d99e18eab5742dece5a1b" alt="Sad :("
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Doesn't look like there is much mustard on his passes trench and the deep balls hang up and flutter a lot, but in his defense seems like he is always dodging defenders and moving his feet making it hard to get in a good set throwing position. Also there were some bad snaps which didn't help his cause any.
Last edited by cbolt on Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Agree 100%. Unfortunately I feel there are too many people around Logan athletics that want the "old rivalries"Paladin wrote: Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:20 pm Locos
I like the addition of Canal. Anything to maintain contact with Central Ohio teams and get exposure. OCC or Mid State. Logan needs to get out of playing SEO and move on to developing relationships in Central Ohio. League comes quicker that way.
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Logan needs to completely get away from SEO. They showed they do not want Logan so Logan should put those days behind them.
GO LOGAN..The anti-Christ is among us
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4139
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Wow, I think you're all a little harsh.
Logan's defense is definitely improved. It might be the best group of linebackers since Amyx was here and not a senior in the group. Three sophomores as well.
DBs tipped a number of passes (one that was returned for TD). Definitely some alignment/responsibility problems, but its a scrimmage and the first real "game" conditions for this group (every other scrimmage was very much controlled).
The offense struggled - A LOT. But the offensive line is down two guys I think might be starting if they were healthy - and maybe three guys. I still like Preston Yates a lot at the tailback spot.
Would like to see the offense try some more true read option and use Walsh's running ability from the QB spot. Receivers are very green and had trouble getting seperation. And the QB did not play well - although its correct he was running for his life too often.
For the first two quarters the game was competitive - the third Q was a nightmare. The quarterback through 5 interceptions all of last year and threw 3 on Friday. I'll go with the larger sample size.
Logan's defense is definitely improved. It might be the best group of linebackers since Amyx was here and not a senior in the group. Three sophomores as well.
DBs tipped a number of passes (one that was returned for TD). Definitely some alignment/responsibility problems, but its a scrimmage and the first real "game" conditions for this group (every other scrimmage was very much controlled).
The offense struggled - A LOT. But the offensive line is down two guys I think might be starting if they were healthy - and maybe three guys. I still like Preston Yates a lot at the tailback spot.
Would like to see the offense try some more true read option and use Walsh's running ability from the QB spot. Receivers are very green and had trouble getting seperation. And the QB did not play well - although its correct he was running for his life too often.
For the first two quarters the game was competitive - the third Q was a nightmare. The quarterback through 5 interceptions all of last year and threw 3 on Friday. I'll go with the larger sample size.
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
I again agree. The problem is that there are too many people around the Logan athletics that are living in the glory days of the SEOAL.noreply66 wrote: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:29 am Logan needs to completely get away from SEO. They showed they do not want Logan so Logan should put those days behind them.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1455
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:29 pm
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
I've not said one word about Warren being any good. With Logan's schedule they will win 5-6 or more.1987chieftains wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:27 pm When Warren has a more then 1 winning season in 25 years Barlow then you can talk smack. Until then be happy with a 2 win season against some DVI team and some team from the backwoods WV.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 9:35 am
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Not sure about the too many and the glory days of the SEOAL . People I talk to are talking about the future and the hope for a league membership.SEFan wrote: Sun Aug 20, 2017 10:52 amI again agree. The problem is that there are too many people around the Logan athletics that are living in the glory days of the SEOAL.noreply66 wrote: Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:29 am Logan needs to completely get away from SEO. They showed they do not want Logan so Logan should put those days behind them.
.
- GoBucks1047
- Varsity
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 12:44 am
- Location: Scioto County
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
This is just my youthful opinion as an outsider from Logan, but if Logan continues scheduling SEO, there's only 3 schools I would consider scheduling: Athens, Chillicothe, and Jackson. They would provide quality rivalry games most years, travel is good, and provides a pretty good gate for everyone I think in home & home matchups. Sorry Meigs, Nelsonville-York, and Warren, but Logan is looking to Central Ohio. I wouldn't schedule all 3 in 1 season though as scheduling 2 of the 3 teams at most still provides many teams to schedule scrimmages and regular season games from the LCL, MSL-Buckeye + Whitehall-Yearling, MVL + Zanesville (assuming they're considered Central Ohio), and OCC. I'd only consider scheduling Chillicothe annually as long as they stay D2 and wouldn't consider Athens and Jackson if they were to fall to D4 (shouldn't happen in the near future). I think it's a good plan until Logan is accepted into a league or conference, and it's still a reasonable plan once Logan's in a league or conference. Just my opinion.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
Logan can look to central Ohio all they want. Nelsonville-York is happy playing schools our size for the most part.GoBucks1047 wrote: Sun Aug 20, 2017 2:32 pm This is just my youthful opinion as an outsider from Logan, but if Logan continues scheduling SEO, there's only 3 schools I would consider scheduling: Athens, Chillicothe, and Jackson. They would provide quality rivalry games most years, travel is good, and provides a pretty good gate for everyone I think in home & home matchups. Sorry Meigs, Nelsonville-York, and Warren, but Logan is looking to Central Ohio. I wouldn't schedule all 3 in 1 season though as scheduling 2 of the 3 teams at most still provides many teams to schedule scrimmages and regular season games from the LCL, MSL-Buckeye + Whitehall-Yearling, MVL + Zanesville (assuming they're considered Central Ohio), and OCC. I'd only consider scheduling Chillicothe annually as long as they stay D2 and wouldn't consider Athens and Jackson if they were to fall to D4 (shouldn't happen in the near future). I think it's a good plan until Logan is accepted into a league or conference, and it's still a reasonable plan once Logan's in a league or conference. Just my opinion.
We dropped Logan, they didn't drop us.
Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
- Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area
Re: 2017 Logan Cheiftains
I'd consider playing D-III teams and up. That includes Athens, Chilli ,Jackson and would include Marietta and Warren. But the rest of SEO needs to move on. The future is north, not south and while you need games, especially non- league games, league to the north will eventually happen. Much of SEO will continue to shrink and student enrollment will drop , moving teams to even smaller divisions. Logan will remain fairly stable as a commuter town to Central Ohio work. So Logan, as a D-II, will be playing a D-I thru D-III schedule. Most of SEO is smaller and going to get smaller. But the 5 above teams, as long as they stay D-III or higher are fine. There just isn't much of a future for Logan in sports in SEO.
Have gun, will travel