He was being 100% sarcastic.Ironmannut07 wrote:Looks like almost the complete opposite of your guess.Viking96 wrote:People have been sleeping on jackson and underestimating them all year....so in keeping with that ill say Logan 48
Jackson 7
Logan throws all over jackson. Jackson has played a bunch of d5 schools
WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
If so, they picked the right week for that.Ironmannut07 wrote:Who got ejected? Does that mean suspensions for next week?
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
No Ironmen were ejected. 56 for Logan was. It was just about to escelate.
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
The radio announcers said they couldn't tell from where they were but the officials were pointing at both sides and they also said whoever it was would have to sit out the rest of this game and next weeks game as well.Ironmannut07 wrote:Who got ejected? Does that mean suspensions for next week?
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
[quote="Ironmannut07"]Trying to keep up to date down in sc. Gotta love the marine corps lol[/quote]
Thank you for what your doing. Go Ironmen
Thank you for what your doing. Go Ironmen
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Order has been restored and a big message sent !!!!
Jackson 42
Logan 7
Jackson 42
Logan 7
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
I really thought it would be a little closer. Jackson has one heck of a team. They should win a game or 2 Come playoff time.Viking96 wrote:Order has been restored and a big message sent !!!!
Jackson 42
Logan 7
- doubleplay643
- S
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
#49 for Logan ran ball well, good player, needed more touches.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Jackson's secondary is horrible!!!!!!!! If they ever face a good passing team they are screwed. I'm an Ironmen fan just stating the facts.
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
A good front seven a good passing team might be screwed and that is what Jackson seems to have.Oakie_Dokie wrote:Jackson's secondary is horrible!!!!!!!! If they ever face a good passing team they are screwed. I'm an Ironmen fan just stating the facts.
They shut down a very good Wheelersburg team that likes to pass.
This is a very solid Jackson team that may not only go undefeated but make a very strong run in the playoffs.
And this is coming from a Ironton fan seeing what the Tigers has before them and that is a solid strong Jackson team.
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
I don't agree with that at allOakie_Dokie wrote:Jackson's secondary is horrible!!!!!!!! If they ever face a good passing team they are screwed. I'm an Ironmen fan just stating the facts.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
maniac66 wrote:A good front seven a good passing team might be screwed and that is what Jackson seems to have.Oakie_Dokie wrote:Jackson's secondary is horrible!!!!!!!! If they ever face a good passing team they are screwed. I'm an Ironmen fan just stating the facts.
They shut down a very good Wheelersburg team that likes to pass.
This is a very solid Jackson team that may not only go undefeated but make a very strong run in the playoffs.
And this is coming from a Ironton fan seeing what the Tigers has before them and that is a solid strong Jackson team.
Jackson is super solid!!! But the secondary is weak! Seen it on too many plays. I'm just saying that's an area that needs much attention!
- doubleplay643
- S
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Be interesting to see stats. My guess is 140 passing and 80 rushing. I will take that every week.
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
So your opinion is a fact?Oakie_Dokie wrote:Jackson's secondary is horrible!!!!!!!! If they ever face a good passing team they are screwed. I'm an Ironmen fan just stating the facts.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
I have watched every single game and every single play, and if there is one area that needs work it's the secondary! The Ironmen are great no doubt about it, but I'm telling you need they need to work on the secondary!
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
It just seems trollish to come on here and pounce on something that had no effect on a win by 5 touchdowns. What did the secondary cost us? Do you really think they aren't trying to improve every area of the game?Oakie_Dokie wrote:I have watched every single game and every single play, and if there is one area that needs work it's the secondary! The Ironmen are great no doubt about it, but I'm telling you need they need to work on the secondary!
I just don't see the point.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:53 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Ironman92 wrote:It just seems trollish to come on here and pounce on something that had no effect on a win by 5 touchdowns. What did the secondary cost us? Do you really think they aren't trying to improve every area of the game?Oakie_Dokie wrote:I have watched every single game and every single play, and if there is one area that needs work it's the secondary! The Ironmen are great no doubt about it, but I'm telling you need they need to work on the secondary!
I just don't see the point.
Your right it had no effect on tonight's game. I'm just saying that's a great area of concern! I for one would like to see them go far in the playoffs
Last edited by Oakie_Dokie on Sat Oct 11, 2014 12:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
To say they're horrible is insane . We've played and shutdown some real nice teams this year. You're probably one of those jackson fans who won't even get up and cheer when we score . Sad !!
- doubleplay643
- S
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm
Re: WEEK 7: LOGAN (3-3) @ JACKSON (6-0)
Logan averaged 37 points per game and 400 plus total yds per game. Good effort all around, I would rather see them work on kick coverage. Burg and Logan both about broke one off for 6.