Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

User avatar
doubleplay643
S
Posts: 1776
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by doubleplay643 »

Coach Burke is a shoe in for SEOAL honors.

Congrats to the Chiefs on SEOAL Championship, the only way Logan doesn't win SEOAL outright is if 50 players get in school suspension on Friday afternoon and are prohibited from playing and there is a forfeit....Logan rolls 48-14 or so in the easiest pick of the week in any pick-em contest.


User avatar
LHS 72
S
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:25 pm
Location: Hocking Co.

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by LHS 72 »

Warren seems to be in disarray like the Chiefs where last year


User avatar
dazed&confused
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9288
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by dazed&confused »

Go Chiefs! Great feel good season. Now let's follow up with a great off season. Winners are made in the weight room!


User avatar
TRENCHFOOT
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 21260
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Location: ChieftainCountry

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by TRENCHFOOT »

I agree. GO CHIEFS!!


User avatar
YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 25696
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: WAVERLY, OHIO

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT »

good luck to the chiefs, glad to see things rolling there again.


TigerBacker#1
Riding the Bench
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 9:47 am

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by TigerBacker#1 »

Thanks bait. Maybe Ironton will return to the top someday.


northern exposure
Waterboy
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:15 pm

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by northern exposure »

LHS 72 wrote:Warren seems to be in disarray like the Chiefs where last year
What makes you think they are in disarray? They've had the same coaches for 4 years - they aren't in disarray - its a bad head coach. His records are getting worse and you would think with the league being down they could get to 500.


User avatar
LHS 72
S
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:25 pm
Location: Hocking Co.

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by LHS 72 »

ToeStubber01 wrote:
LHS 72 wrote:Warren seems to be in disarray like the Chiefs where last year
What makes you think they are in disarray? They've had the same coaches for 4 years - they aren't in disarray - its a bad head coach. His records are getting worse and you would think with the league being down they could get to 500.
Just what it sounds and looks like from the outside


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by Paladin »

CalPreps is calling it Logan, 38-21. That's very close to my prediction above.

Go Chiefs !


User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 287091
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by noreply66 »

Warren has shown at times they have a defense and we know Logan's Defense can show up..........so this might be a 20/14 game


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by Paladin »

Logan has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL. Only 69 pts in 3 games ( 23pts average). I'm expecting Logan to score a lot, even against Warren. Senior night and an outright title for the taking.. No, this will not be a low scoring game.


User avatar
doubleplay643
S
Posts: 1776
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by doubleplay643 »

Paladin wrote:Logan has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL. Only 69 pts in 3 games ( 23pts average). I'm expecting Logan to score a lot, even against Warren. Senior night and an outright title for the taking.. No, this will not be a low scoring game.
:roll: :122246 :122245

FACT CHECK:

Hey Mr. "I got two degrees Paladin", LEARN TO ADD. What is 28+19+20?

Jackson has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL with a total of 67 points given up in 3 games lol...you are completely clueless.

C'mon Man get it right, lest you embarrass yourself more.


User avatar
LHS 72
S
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:25 pm
Location: Hocking Co.

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by LHS 72 »

doubleplay643 wrote:
Paladin wrote:Logan has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL. Only 69 pts in 3 games ( 23pts average). I'm expecting Logan to score a lot, even against Warren. Senior night and an outright title for the taking.. No, this will not be a low scoring game.
:roll: :122246 :122245

FACT CHECK:

Hey Mr. "I got two degrees Paladin", LEARN TO ADD. What is 28+19+20?

Jackson has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL with a total of 67 points given up in 3 games lol...you are completely clueless.

C'mon Man get it right, lest you embarrass yourself more.
Man he is playing with your mind! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


User avatar
doubleplay643
S
Posts: 1776
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by doubleplay643 »

No LHS 72 lol I just like to call him out when he spews out his fact-less information.

Is he mind-numbing? Yes

Is he mindless? Yes

Is he playing with anyone's minds here? Nope, pretty sure everyone knows he is a *%#& - stirrer.

Congrats to the Chiefs this year by the way on the beginning of a nice program turnaround.


User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 287091
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by noreply66 »

SEOAL Scoring

...................Off...............Def............Dif

Logan............39.00............23.00..........+16
Portsmouth.....34.00............40.33..........-6.33
Gallipolis........32.33............38.33..........-6
Jackson..........27.33............22.33..........+5
Warren..........21.00............27.33...........-6.33


Who will score the most points Friday night....Gallipolis averaging 32.33 points a game against Jackson allowing 22.33 a game
........................................................Warren averaging 21.00 points a game against Logan allowing 23.00 a game


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by Paladin »



User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 287091
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by noreply66 »


Jackson has given up.............20/28/19=67.......0.67 less than Logan per game in league play but with points scored it is Jackson +5 points to Logans + 16 per game


User avatar
doubleplay643
S
Posts: 1776
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by doubleplay643 »

Paladin wrote:Logan has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL. Only 69 pts in 3 games
Jackson & Warren (35-20)
Jackson & Logan (21-28)
Jackson & Portsmouth (26-19)

20+28+19 = 67

67 < 69

Paladin is wrong again.


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by Paladin »

SEOAL Football.com had it wrong.

Of course after this week's games , its fair to say Logan comes out on top with best D against scoring.................... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Go Chiefs ! 8)


User avatar
doubleplay643
S
Posts: 1776
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:40 pm

Re: Week Ten: Warren (3-6, 1-2) AT Logan (5-4, 3-0)

Post by doubleplay643 »

Paladin wrote:Logan has the best D against scoring in the SEOAL. Only 69 pts in 3 games
SEOAL Football has the scores posted correctly.

Jackson & Warren (35-20)
Jackson & Logan (21-28)
Jackson & Portsmouth (26-19)

20+28+19 = 67

67 < 69

Paladin is wrong again. :122246


Post Reply

Return to “Football”