

dragonsfan24 wrote:Gallia was extended a bid at the same time as Ironton and Portsmouth but declined.
I agree 100%. The ovc is almost like a city league because all the schools are so close. I think the ovc will finally step up with the exitement of two prestigous schools coming in.4th n Goal wrote:I like the direction that the OVC has gone with the additions of Portsmouth and Ironton. All of the schools are on US52 and an easy commute to games. I think the last thing they would want is to add a school much larger than any other school like Jackson. The OVC needs to watch out they do not get too big too fast. Adding divisions and too many teams may not be the best thing for the league as a whole.
so Jackson automatically gets the win over Ironton Portsmouth Fairland , and CG ????? of their 6 wins 0 was against a team with a winning record!!!goUK wrote:The only problem with jackson and gallia coming in is they would have a really weak schedule. They are both division 3 when the rest of the league is division 5 or 6.
For example jackson went 6-4 in 2013. If they were in the ovc they would have went 8-0 (with gallia,ironton, portsmouth included) and say they lost their 2 out of conference g.ames..... Would they have mAde the playoffs? Even if they did they wouldnt have been prepared for a #1 or 2 seed in div 3.
cg-ironton fan wrote:so Jackson automatically gets the win over Ironton Portsmouth Fairland , and CG ????? of their 6 wins 0 was against a team with a winning record!!!goUK wrote:The only problem with jackson and gallia coming in is they would have a really weak schedule. They are both division 3 when the rest of the league is division 5 or 6.
For example jackson went 6-4 in 2013. If they were in the ovc they would have went 8-0 (with gallia,ironton, portsmouth included) and say they lost their 2 out of conference g.ames..... Would they have mAde the playoffs? Even if they did they wouldnt have been prepared for a #1 or 2 seed in div 3.
West did play both and after seeing Fairland offense and Portsmouths defense, Fairland wins that one by at least 2 scores.goUK wrote:Fair vs gallia lost by 25
Ports vs gallia lost by 6
Fair vs west won by 12
Ports vs west won by 15
Fair vs burg lost by 23
Ports vs burg lost by 28
Fairland beat 1 winning team. You can say 2 but everyone knows SP had the weakest schedule ever. How can you say fairland would 100% beat portsmouth because between these games ports is -19 points and fairland is -36.
It doesn't matter what their opponents records were. I saw both teams play the same opponent and Fairland was the better team. I like how you wanted to through the wheelersburg scores out there. It took Burg to the 4th quarter to secure the win against Fairland. Where as against Portsmouth the Burg starters didn't finish the game.goUK wrote:Fairlands opponent record 56-50. Avg division of opponent 4.7
Portsmouths opponent record 66-40 avg division of opponent 4.1
Just random stats. I didnt try to prove a point in that specific post.noles_fan wrote:It doesn't matter what their opponents records were. I saw both teams play the same opponent and Fairland was the better team. I like how you wanted to through the wheelersburg scores out there. It took Burg to the 4th quarter to secure the win against Fairland. Where as against Portsmouth the Burg starters didn't finish the game.goUK wrote:Fairlands opponent record 56-50. Avg division of opponent 4.7
Portsmouths opponent record 66-40 avg division of opponent 4.1