Logan 54 Portsmouth 27

User avatar
The Oaf
SEO
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:05 am
Location: Up in da boof

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by The Oaf »

Paladin wrote:He who laughs last laughs best, Trenchfoot. Most of SEO knows very little about football. I see it posted here everyday. The Chiefs will challenge. This was too easy a game to call but most of SEO blew it picking Portsmouth. The game was a blowout win for Logan. They will match up well with most of the league. It ain't over till the fat lady sings ..................... :lol: :lol: :lol:
How is your wife doing these days? Can she still hit the high note?


User avatar
C-Bolt
SEOP
Posts: 3762
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:11 am

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by C-Bolt »

Good God what happened to Portsmouth? Thought they were so much improved, was the ride up that hard? Oh well big confidence builder for Logan


User avatar
TRENCHFOOT
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 21260
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Location: ChieftainCountry

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by TRENCHFOOT »

I see things clicking again Paladin. Chiefs will be in the hunt for sure. No doubt in my mind. Some were getting a good laugh the last 3 years but that's changing just like I thought it would. It's easy to see. GO CHIEFS!!!


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by Paladin »

Portsmouth is improved. Just ask Ironton. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Problem is, most of SEO fails to gage Logan football and is fooled because of the difficult early schedule they play. The haters are embarrassed I called this game correctly and warned that Logan will challenge the league. Figured this one to be a blowout & the Chiefs didn't disappoint.

"yawn"


User avatar
TRENCHFOOT
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 21260
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Location: ChieftainCountry

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by TRENCHFOOT »

The Oaf wrote:
Paladin wrote:He who laughs last laughs best, Trenchfoot. Most of SEO knows very little about football. I see it posted here everyday. The Chiefs will challenge. This was too easy a game to call but most of SEO blew it picking Portsmouth. The game was a blowout win for Logan. They will match up well with most of the league. It ain't over till the fat lady sings ..................... :lol: :lol: :lol:
How is your wife doing these days? Can she still hit the high note?
:lol:


User avatar
TRENCHFOOT
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 21260
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Location: ChieftainCountry

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by TRENCHFOOT »

C-Bolt wrote:Good God what happened to Portsmouth? Thought they were so much improved, was the ride up that hard? Oh well big confidence builder for Logan
And the banquet beer goes down even easier tonite Bolt. The shark aint got nothing on the catfish tonite. :lol: ;-)


CharlieHustle
All Conference
Posts: 910
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:06 pm

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by CharlieHustle »

By far the worst game portsmouth has played this year. I'm still in disbelief.

Thoughts of the night:
1. Old Dutch Restaurant is very below average.
2. Logan's stadium/facilities are absolutely incredible. Hats off to that architect.
3. Trojans got spanked.
4. Logan's band is incredible, I don't remember them being that good or big last season.
5. We just took about 30 steps back from last week.


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by Paladin »

Portsmouth has gotten better and kicked Ironton around to prove it. They have a new athletic QB. Problem here is that most of SEO is fooled by the Logan schedule and haven't a clue on how to judge the program. Logan is much better that most think. Much better.


moonshine
SEO
Posts: 2925
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 10:12 pm

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by moonshine »

A sleeping giant is begin to wake up!


User avatar
bird78
Varsity
Posts: 492
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 5:40 pm

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by bird78 »

YOUBET IT IS.....CALLED....''ALLSTATE..... :shock: :!: :idea: :-D :122249 ;-)


91blue14
SE
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:37 pm

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by 91blue14 »

good job chiefs


Orange and Brown
SEOPS Mr. Ohio
Posts: 20590
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Next to a lake somewhere
Contact:

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by Orange and Brown »

Looks like the Chiefs are coming together.


User avatar
1987chieftains
SEOPS H
Posts: 7661
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by 1987chieftains »

for a running back nick kost is doing a good job. but if lane little was at qb we'd imo we would have beat teays, been closer in loudenville and beaten nelsontucky and newark badly.


User avatar
LHS 72
S
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:25 pm
Location: Hocking Co.

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by LHS 72 »

1987chieftains wrote:for a running back nick kost is doing a good job. but if lane little was at qb we'd imo we would have beat teays, been closer in loudenville and beaten nelsontucky and newark badly.
Would have could have and if are big words, Let's give Kost and his team credit GOOD JOB CHIEFS!


SPG9
Waterboy
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 9:42 am

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by SPG9 »

Paladin wrote:He who laughs last laughs best, Trenchfoot. Most of SEO knows very little about football. I see it posted here everyday. The Chiefs will challenge. This was too easy a game to call but most of SEO blew it picking Portsmouth. The game was a blowout win for Logan. They will match up well with most of the league. It ain't over till the fat lady sings ..................... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Aren't you the same guy commenting how bad Nelsonville must be because Logan beat them? Maybe it is you who lacks knowledge about the game. What a fan you are.


User avatar
1987chieftains
SEOPS H
Posts: 7661
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by 1987chieftains »

LHS 72 wrote:
1987chieftains wrote:for a running back nick kost is doing a good job. but if lane little was at qb we'd imo we would have beat teays, been closer in loudenville and beaten nelsontucky and newark badly.
Would have could have and if are big words, Let's give Kost and his team credit GOOD JOB CHIEFS!
i am giving nick and the team credit.


Paladin
SEOP
Posts: 4304
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Warren-Youngstown, Ohio metro area

Re: Week Six: Portsmouth (2-3) AT Logan (2-3)

Post by Paladin »

1987 -- Kost is doing a good job considering he isn't a QB and Logan would be doing even better with a QB. How much better ? Lets review quickly.............who did Logan scrimmage ? Logan competed well in those scrimmages and those teams are all winning. The usual yardstick is Sheridan and they weren't highly picked this year while Logan beat them pretty good in the scrimmage. Yet look at were Sheridan is at ? Back up at the top of the MVL. Next, I don't doubt, IMO, that had Logan's QB not been knocked out, they would have BEAT TV and Loudonville would have been a close game. And, for the TV game and others, Logan lost 15 players to injury and have started to get them almost all back. Yet, people have missed how competitive Logan had been in the scrimmages and early games against VERY GOOD teams missing 15 players & the QB. The hard part of the schedule is over with ( except for ZHS). People are going to have problems matching up with Logan, and given what they do, they'll do it well against the SEOAL. There is a title to be won and Logan is capable of competing. Next up -- Jackson.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”