Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Pocket Aces
S
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:07 am

Re: WK3 Valley @ Coal Grove

Post by Pocket Aces »

wobycat wrote:
Pocket Aces wrote:No running it up in this one, not one bit. There was tons of time left on both long LV 4q td runs. Went to the V for last two plays at the end. Valley is a really good team....in spite of the score they put up, their defense is the strength of that team.

I still believe in my Hornets!
I do recall a poster saying it was ridiculous that the Burg staff should have taken a knee in the previous game. Said it showed no class and argued that it could have cost an injury to a starter. But this week, it's perfectly fine when Valley has their starters in with 8:00 to go when it's a 49 to 14 game, surely no injury will occur.

I will ask the question, that was presented to me from last week. Explain to me logically?

Lol, 8 minutes left versus 50 seconds..... Occam's Razor suggests that if that is the best counterpoint that you have, you know your coach was wayyyy in the wrong last week. Clearly they practice the victory formation up in Lucasville as opposed to wheelersburg. Not to mention the 1:00 fade route passes not being utilized.

You know it was wrong is all that your trolling suggests.


Docw
Riding the Bench
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:00 pm

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by Docw »

First let me say I'm a CG fan, but that was the worst defensive effort I've seen in a very long time from a CG team. No intensity, poor tackling and an overall lack of hustle. To me and a lot of people around me, the effort was embarrassing on both sides of the ball. If fans can see this I'm sure the coaches can as well. Can they not get a player's attention and substitute for him until he decides to give a better effort? We can only hope that things get better from here on! Best of luck to Valley and congratulations on a well played game.


wobycat
SEOPS
Posts: 6145
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:53 am

Re: WK3 Valley @ Coal Grove

Post by wobycat »

Pocket Aces wrote:
wobycat wrote:
Pocket Aces wrote:No running it up in this one, not one bit. There was tons of time left on both long LV 4q td runs. Went to the V for last two plays at the end. Valley is a really good team....in spite of the score they put up, their defense is the strength of that team.

I still believe in my Hornets!
I do recall a poster saying it was ridiculous that the Burg staff should have taken a knee in the previous game. Said it showed no class and argued that it could have cost an injury to a starter. But this week, it's perfectly fine when Valley has their starters in with 8:00 to go when it's a 49 to 14 game, surely no injury will occur.

I will ask the question, that was presented to me from last week. Explain to me logically?

Lol, 8 minutes left versus 50 seconds..... Occam's Razor suggests that if that is the best counterpoint that you have, you know your coach was wayyyy in the wrong last week. Clearly they practice the victory formation up in Lucasville as opposed to wheelersburg. Not to mention the 1:00 fade route passes not being utilized.

You know it was wrong is all that your trolling suggests.
Image


User avatar
tl895
Varsity
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:53 pm

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by tl895 »

grove looking forward to league play and how!!!


Pocket Aces
S
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by Pocket Aces »

Oh look! wobblycat took Memes 101 instead of Principles of Logic. Money clearly well-spent.

Flattering that you're obsessed with CG's season though. Go Hornets!


here4fun
Varsity
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:19 pm

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by here4fun »

3 down 7 more to go cant wait until soc starts.....


Fan of The Blue and Gold
Freshman Team
Posts: 171
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:40 pm

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by Fan of The Blue and Gold »

Sorry Herd4Fun, it is 3 down and 1 to go!!! The 1 being the next one! There is no such thing as winning 7 games at one time.


vladimir
S
Posts: 1665
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by vladimir »

Question for Coal Grove fans, who do you think has the better team: Wheelersburg or Valley, and why?


wobycat
SEOPS
Posts: 6145
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:53 am

Re: Valley 56 Coal Grove 21

Post by wobycat »

Vladimir wrote:Question for Coal Grove fans, who do you think has the better team: Wheelersburg or Valley, and why?
I'm a Burg fan and I can say it's hard to tell. Coal Grove gave up 130 points in three games. Valley, to me, probably has the best defense in Southern Ohio. Burg's offense is very difficult to stop. They can score in a quick amount of time. To me the edge goes to Valley. They seem to have a good offense to go with that stout D.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”