You do realize that not all schools post stats to max preps. Don’t you?SiderBlood wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:52 pmNot sure what is funny about that? Kid has 5 interceptions with 2 I know of being for pick 6's. This has been a bend but don't break defense which always seems to come up with a big turnover or big play in the crunch time.
http://www.maxpreps.com/list/stat_leade ... l&state=oh
Waverly(27) @ (31)West
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 11:22 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:23 pm
- Location: Wild West
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
Yes I do realize that. And I'm going off of what has been documented. But I can almost guarantee you that his name would be near the top if every team were to post stats.Sports-nut wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 9:05 pmYou do realize that not all schools post stats to max preps. Don’t you?SiderBlood wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:52 pmNot sure what is funny about that? Kid has 5 interceptions with 2 I know of being for pick 6's. This has been a bend but don't break defense which always seems to come up with a big turnover or big play in the crunch time.
http://www.maxpreps.com/list/stat_leade ... l&state=oh
"Everyone has a plan until you get punched in the mouth" - Mike Tyson
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
????????? Where does it say that???????????Westfan wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:43 pmWhat in the Minford game makes you think West can't run the ball effectively?wobycat wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:39 pmI just watched the minford-west game and changed my mind. This one will be a shoot out but west will control enough time of possession to win but I’ll say 42-35 west but I can easily see waverly winning as well.wobycat wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:58 am Waverly run defense in the middle is abysmal for whatever reason. West will run in middle a lot. West wins by three scores. 28-7
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 3:38 pm
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
5 interceptions is impressive. He should guard butter.SiderBlood wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:52 pmNot sure what is funny about that? Kid has 5 interceptions with 2 I know of being for pick 6's. This has been a bend but don't break defense which always seems to come up with a big turnover or big play in the crunch time.
http://www.maxpreps.com/list/stat_leade ... l&state=oh
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:01 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
Because he's from Burg and nobody in the world can run on Burg. Lol. Just ask Coshocton.Westfan wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:43 pmWhat in the Minford game makes you think West can't run the ball effectively?wobycat wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:39 pmI just watched the minford-west game and changed my mind. This one will be a shoot out but west will control enough time of possession to win but I’ll say 42-35 west but I can easily see waverly winning as well.wobycat wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:58 am Waverly run defense in the middle is abysmal for whatever reason. West will run in middle a lot. West wins by three scores. 28-7
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
Lol... everyone knows coshocton beat burg last season... the saddest part about you bringing up coshocton is that your team can't beat burg. You live through others teams accomplishments..Bleeding Red wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:16 pmBecause he's from Burg and nobody in the world can run on Burg. Lol. Just ask Coshocton.Westfan wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:43 pmWhat in the Minford game makes you think West can't run the ball effectively?wobycat wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 1:39 pm
I just watched the minford-west game and changed my mind. This one will be a shoot out but west will control enough time of possession to win but I’ll say 42-35 west but I can easily see waverly winning as well.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
Dude is trash BG6.BurgGrad6 wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:38 pmLol... everyone knows coshocton beat burg last season... the saddest part about you bringing up coshocton is that your team can't beat burg. You live through others teams accomplishments..Bleeding Red wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:16 pmBecause he's from Burg and nobody in the world can run on Burg. Lol. Just ask Coshocton.Westfan wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:43 pm
What in the Minford game makes you think West can't run the ball effectively?
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
I agree. He is an idiot. He knows his team is awful. Has probably never beat burg at anything. Has to get his rocks off on others achievements. Haha pathetic.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:25 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
After Watching Burg and Waverly, this game could get out of hand. Not scoring, but personal fouls. Waverly was VERY mouthy and chest pumping. While I know Burg does their share of this too at times, West has always been a team that not only doesn't take sh!t, but they feed it back and then some. Between the two teams if they both get into a Pissing contest, the refs might be VERY BUSY!
I still like West in this one 35-21
I still like West in this one 35-21
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
This is a game I could see going a number of ways. Where it's at in the schedule you've got Waverly coming off losing multiple kids over last couple weeks and just got it handed to them by burg last week. For West they've surpassed everyone on the outside looking in expectations but do they start to look at that week 10 matchup vs Burg. Let's by real West is watching game this week on Waverly but that opponent they're playing is Burg. So does Waverly man up after that beat down or do they pack it in and for West are they looking ahead. If West struggles in the passing game I won't be at all surprised to see a Waverly upset in this one with West looking ahead. Waverly's injuries are really in the secondary and West likes to run that ball. Believe coaches from Waverly get them fired up for this one and I'm going to take Waverly 35-28 upset special.
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
West just needs to focus on one game at a time. Don't look ahead to burg they will be still be there come week 10.
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
West always has good pass defenders and good Lb play. Test will be can they get off blocks on quick passes to receivers, Tackle good and limit yards gained. West will run very well if waverly doesn’t shore up dline and have a better run stopping performance by their Lbs
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 866
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:23 pm
- Location: Wild West
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
While I won't disagree entirely on past reputation, I will say a lot has changed. A no nonsense coach does not put up with unnecessary penalties. Personal fouls are not tolerated anymore, and players will be taken out of the game. I've seen it happen and that tactic has really seemed to drop the penalty numbers over the past few years.Neutron Man wrote: Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:57 am After Watching Burg and Waverly, this game could get out of hand. Not scoring, but personal fouls. Waverly was VERY mouthy and chest pumping. While I know Burg does their share of this too at times, West has always been a team that not only doesn't take sh!t, but they feed it back and then some. Between the two teams if they both get into a Pissing contest, the refs might be VERY BUSY!
I still like West in this one 35-21
"Everyone has a plan until you get punched in the mouth" - Mike Tyson
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:01 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
I am just saying that you shouldnt put the cart before the horse buddy.BurgGrad6 wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:38 pmLol... everyone knows coshocton beat burg last season... the saddest part about you bringing up coshocton is that your team can't beat burg. You live through others teams accomplishments..Bleeding Red wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:16 pmBecause he's from Burg and nobody in the world can run on Burg. Lol. Just ask Coshocton.Westfan wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:43 pm
What in the Minford game makes you think West can't run the ball effectively?
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:01 am
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
We beat Burg numerous times in numerous sports while I was in high school. Good try though.BurgGrad6 wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:44 pm I agree. He is an idiot. He knows his team is awful. Has probably never beat burg at anything. Has to get his rocks off on others achievements. Haha pathetic.
-
- All Conference
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 6:25 pm
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
I don't see how Waverly was anymore more "mouthy and chest pumping" than Burg was. I bet Burg had just as many, if not more, unsportsmanlike penalties thrown on them.Neutron Man wrote: Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:57 am After Watching Burg and Waverly, this game could get out of hand. Not scoring, but personal fouls. Waverly was VERY mouthy and chest pumping. While I know Burg does their share of this too at times, West has always been a team that not only doesn't take sh!t, but they feed it back and then some. Between the two teams if they both get into a Pissing contest, the refs might be VERY BUSY!
I still like West in this one 35-21
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
You have brought up coshocton several times... let's talk about that game. If burg didn't fumble 7 times, the most likely win the game..Bleeding Red wrote: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:40 amI am just saying that you shouldnt put the cart before the horse buddy.BurgGrad6 wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:38 pmLol... everyone knows coshocton beat burg last season... the saddest part about you bringing up coshocton is that your team can't beat burg. You live through others teams accomplishments..Bleeding Red wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:16 pm
Because he's from Burg and nobody in the world can run on Burg. Lol. Just ask Coshocton.
Now, who has ran on burg this year??
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
Not possible. Burg is the Gold Standard of football. Teams should be greatful to survive the games let alone win. Burg Burg Burg.Bleeding Red wrote: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:40 amWe beat Burg numerous times in numerous sports while I was in high school. Good try though.BurgGrad6 wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:44 pm I agree. He is an idiot. He knows his team is awful. Has probably never beat burg at anything. Has to get his rocks off on others achievements. Haha pathetic.
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
So many groupies! Jealousy is a sickness boys..Oak wrote: Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:41 pmNot possible. Burg is the Gold Standard of football. Teams should be greatful to survive the games let alone win. Burg Burg Burg.Bleeding Red wrote: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:40 amWe beat Burg numerous times in numerous sports while I was in high school. Good try though.BurgGrad6 wrote: Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:44 pm I agree. He is an idiot. He knows his team is awful. Has probably never beat burg at anything. Has to get his rocks off on others achievements. Haha pathetic.
Re: WK 8 SOC 2: Waverly (5-2) vs. Portsmouth West (7-0)
Best part is.. minford and oak hill are in a race to be the worst football programs...